PreprintCited by 6Microbial infections and disease researchBird parasitology and diseasesAnimal Behavior and Reproduction

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A high lipid diet leads to greater pathology and lower tolerance during infection

Open access
Perrine, Weston G., Sauer, Erin L., Love, Ashley C., Morris, Ashley, Novotny, Johnathon, DuRant, Sarah E.·2024·Journal of Experimental Biology

Preprint — published as 10.1242/jeb.249541 · Paper page

Abstract

Despite the clear effect of food resources on wildlife disease dynamics, few studies have investigated how shifts in diet, specifically macronutrient content, shape vertebrate host responses to infection. While each individual macronutrient plays a vital role in physiological processes necessary for pathogen defense, it is often difficult to disentangle the role of an individual macronutrient on disease pathology. We explored the effects of dietary macronutrient composition on disease pathology and feeding behavior of canaries ( Serinus canaria domestica) infected with Mycoplasma gallisepticum (MG). First, we provided canaries with isocaloric diets comprised of identical ingredients that varied in macronutrient content (high-protein or high-lipid) then MG- or sham-inoculated birds. We then offered both diets to canaries before and after MG- and sham-inoculation. In experiment one, high protein diet birds consumed more food than high lipid diet birds and experienced a more pronounced decrease in food intake after infection. High protein diet birds were more tolerant to MG infection, exhibiting reduced pathology when compared to high lipid diet birds, despite the two treatments having similar levels of MG-specific antibodies and MG loads. When birds had access to both diets, they consumed more of the high protein diet and experienced pathology for less time than lipid or protein restricted birds. These results highlight that macronutrient makeup of the diet can shape host tolerance and pathology and thus affect host-pathogen transmission dynamics. Summary Statement: Macronutrient composition of the diet shapes tolerance in an avian host pathogen system. Birds that had greater access to protein exhibited reduced pathology despite similar pathogen loads when compared with birds with greater access to lipids.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2024.08.02.606372

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1. Experiment 1: disease pathology and feeding behavior of female canaries (Serinus canaria domestica) fed a high-protein or high-lipid isocaloric diet and later inoculated with Mycoplasma gallisepticum or control solution. Birds received either high-protein (1:4 lipid:protein) or high-lipid (4:1 lipid:protein) diet bars and were inoculated with Mycoplasma gallisepticum (MG) or Frey's media (control) 17 days later. The day of inoculation was termed day 0 and endpoints were monitored for 4 weeks after MG inoculation. Birds remained on the diet for the duration of the experiment. (A) Weekly food intake, (B) furcular fat scores, (C) percentage hematocrit, (D) Mycoplasma gallisepticum (MG)-specific antibody production (optical density, OD), (E) conjunctival swelling, represented by a score of swelling severity, and (F) log10-transformed MG pathogen load. Only MG-infected birds are depicted in panels related to disease outcome (antibody production, eye swelling and pathogen load; D–F). Lipid control, n=13; lipid MG, n=9; protein control, n=10; protein MG, n=10. Points represent raw data with smoothed (A,B,D–F) or linear (C) average trend lines of the raw data surrounded by 95% confidence interval bands in gray.
Fig. 1. Experiment 1: disease pathology and feeding behavior of female canaries (Serinus canaria domestica) fed a high-protein or high-lipid isocaloric diet and later inoculated with Mycoplasma gallisepticum or control solution. Birds received either high-protein (1:4 lipid:protein) or high-lipid (4:1 lipid:protein) diet bars and were inoculated with Mycoplasma gallisepticum (MG) or Frey's media (control) 17 days later. The day of inoculation was termed day 0 and endpoints were monitored for 4 weeks after MG inoculation. Birds remained on the diet for the duration of the experiment. (A) Weekly food intake, (B) furcular fat scores, (C) percentage hematocrit, (D) Mycoplasma gallisepticum (MG)-specific antibody production (optical density, OD), (E) conjunctival swelling, represented by a score of swelling severity, and (F) log10-transformed MG pathogen load. Only MG-infected birds are depicted in panels related to disease outcome (antibody production, eye swelling and pathogen load; D–F). Lipid control, n=13; lipid MG, n=9; protein control, n=10; protein MG, n=10. Points represent raw data with smoothed (A,B,D–F) or linear (C) average trend lines of the raw data surrounded by 95% confidence interval bands in gray.CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 2. Experiment 2: feeding behavior of male and female canaries provided with both the high-lipid and high-protein diet bars and later inoculated with Mycoplasma gallisepticum or control solution. Birds were provided with two isocaloric diet bars, one that was high in protein (1:4 lipid:protein) and one that was high in lipid (4:1 lipid:protein), and were inoculated with Mycoplasma gallisepticum (MG) or Frey's media (control) 17 days later. The day of inoculation was termed day 0 and endpoints were monitored for 4 weeks after inoculation. (A) Weekly total food intake, (B) consumption of the high-protein bar and (C) consumption of the high-lipid diet bar. Controls: n=6 females, n=6 males; MG infected: n=6 females, n=7 males. Points represent raw data with smoothed average trend lines of the raw data surrounded by 95% confidence interval bands in gray.
Fig. 2. Experiment 2: feeding behavior of male and female canaries provided with both the high-lipid and high-protein diet bars and later inoculated with Mycoplasma gallisepticum or control solution. Birds were provided with two isocaloric diet bars, one that was high in protein (1:4 lipid:protein) and one that was high in lipid (4:1 lipid:protein), and were inoculated with Mycoplasma gallisepticum (MG) or Frey's media (control) 17 days later. The day of inoculation was termed day 0 and endpoints were monitored for 4 weeks after inoculation. (A) Weekly total food intake, (B) consumption of the high-protein bar and (C) consumption of the high-lipid diet bar. Controls: n=6 females, n=6 males; MG infected: n=6 females, n=7 males. Points represent raw data with smoothed average trend lines of the raw data surrounded by 95% confidence interval bands in gray.CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 3. Experiment 2: disease pathology of male and female canaries provided with both the high-lipid and high-protein diet bars and later inoculated with Mycoplasma gallisepticum or control solution. Birds were treated as in Fig. 2. (A) Furcular fat stores, (B) body mass, (C) percentage hematocrit and (D) and conjunctival swelling, represented by a score of swelling severity. Only MG-infected birds are depicted in the panel related to disease outcome (eye swelling; D). Controls: n=6 females, n=6 males; MG-infected canaries: n=6 females, n=7 males. Points represent raw data with smoothed (A,B,D) or linear (C) average trend lines of the raw data surrounded by 95% confidence interval bands in gray.
Fig. 3. Experiment 2: disease pathology of male and female canaries provided with both the high-lipid and high-protein diet bars and later inoculated with Mycoplasma gallisepticum or control solution. Birds were treated as in Fig. 2. (A) Furcular fat stores, (B) body mass, (C) percentage hematocrit and (D) and conjunctival swelling, represented by a score of swelling severity. Only MG-infected birds are depicted in the panel related to disease outcome (eye swelling; D). Controls: n=6 females, n=6 males; MG-infected canaries: n=6 females, n=7 males. Points represent raw data with smoothed (A,B,D) or linear (C) average trend lines of the raw data surrounded by 95% confidence interval bands in gray.CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 4. Experiment 2: antibody levels and pathogen load of male and female canaries provided with both the high-lipid and high-protein diet bars and later inoculated with Mycoplasma gallisepticum or control solution. Birds were treated as in Fig. 2. There was a differential effect of sex on (A) MG-specific antibodies and (B) log10-transformed MG load over time in only the Mycoplasma gallisepticum (MG)-exposed canaries. Points represent raw data with average trend lines surrounded by 95% confidence interval bands in gray.
Fig. 4. Experiment 2: antibody levels and pathogen load of male and female canaries provided with both the high-lipid and high-protein diet bars and later inoculated with Mycoplasma gallisepticum or control solution. Birds were treated as in Fig. 2. There was a differential effect of sex on (A) MG-specific antibodies and (B) log10-transformed MG load over time in only the Mycoplasma gallisepticum (MG)-exposed canaries. Points represent raw data with average trend lines surrounded by 95% confidence interval bands in gray.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 54

  1. 10.1177/1534582306289580 · DOI
  2. 10.1242/jeb.013136 · DOI
  3. 10.1098/rsbl.2013.0594 · DOI
  4. 10.1093/icb/icp028 · DOI
  5. 10.1073/pnas.0710335105 · DOI
  6. 10.1098/rstb.2017.0086 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/S0169-4758(99)01620-8 · DOI
  8. 10.1111/1365-2656.12113 · DOI
  9. 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2010.01766.x · DOI
  10. 10.1111/ele.12229 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.jaci.2005.04.036 · DOI
  12. 10.1080/03079450701286277 · DOI
  13. 10.1080/03079450802499100 · DOI
  14. 1997, Role of pro-and anti-inflammatory cytokines during inflammation: experimental and clinical findings, Journal of Biological Regulators and Homeostatic Agents, 11, 91
  15. 10.3382/ps.0741463 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2023.109315 · DOI
  17. 2005, Evolutionary causes andconsequences of immunopathology. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 36, 373, 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.102003.152622 · DOI
  18. 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012339 · DOI
  19. 10.1080/03079450802216629 · DOI
  20. 2019, Modeling the effects of resource-driven immune defense on parasite transmission in heterogenoeous host populations, Integrative and Comparative Biology, 59, 1253, 10.1093/icb/icz074 · DOI
  21. 10.1086/600086 · DOI
  22. 10.1080/03079457.2011.571660 · DOI
  23. 10.1098/rstb.2017.0087 · DOI
  24. 10.1007/BF02381210 · DOI
  25. 10.1079/PNS2003243 · DOI
  26. 10.3382/ps.2008-00386 · DOI
  27. Klasing, K. C. 1998. Comparative Avian Nutrition. CAB International, 1998. · DOI
  28. 10.1080/00071660701671336 · DOI
  29. 10.1126/science.760197 · DOI
  30. 10.1038/s41467-018-02974-x · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1084/jem.186.10.1757 · DOI
  32. 10.1182/blood-2008-02-078071 · DOI
  33. 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2008.01459.x · DOI
  34. 10.1017/S000711450769936X · DOI
  35. 10.3390/cells9041022 · DOI
  36. 2011, Consequences of immunopathology for pathogen virulence evolution and public health: malaria as a case study, Evolutionary Applications, 4, 278, 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2010.00178.x · DOI
  37. 10.1093/beheco/arac120 · DOI
  38. 10.1098/rsbl.2021.0125 · DOI
  39. 10.1111/mec.17428 · DOI
  40. 10.1016/S1286-4579(01)01460-5 · DOI
  41. 10.1093/ajcn/32.3.593 · DOI
  42. 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.10.034 · DOI
  43. 10.1073/pnas.1814273116 · DOI
  44. 10.1111/1365-2656.13152 · DOI
  45. 10.1002/ece3.9865) · DOI
  46. 10.4331/wjbc.v8.i2.120 · DOI
  47. 10.1098/rspb.2011.0522 · DOI
  48. 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01499.x · DOI
  49. 10.1111/1365-2656.12127 · DOI
  50. 10.1111/1365-2656.14026 · DOI
  51. 10.1186/s12862-022-02007-8 · DOI
  52. 10.1098/rstb.2008.0151 · DOI
  53. 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2007.01235.x · DOI
  54. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005030 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Perrine, W. G., Sauer, E. L., Love, A. C., Morris, A., Novotny, J., & DuRant, S. E.
Affiliations
University of Arkansas at Fayetteville (US)
Corresponding author
DuRant, Sarah E.
Venue
Journal of Experimental Biology
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2024-08-06
Volume
228
Issue
5
ISSN
0022-0949 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4407039604
Cited by
6
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4
FWCI
3.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1941861)
  • University of Arkansas
  • Arkansas Biosciences Institute
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Microbial infections and disease research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Bird parasitology and diseases
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Keywords
Mycoplasma gallisepticum, canaries, high-fat diet, macronutrient composition, host tolerance, disease pathology, feeding behavior, dietary intake, wildlife disease, diet and immunity
MeSH terms
Animals, Animal Feed, Bird Diseases, Canaries, Diet, Dietary Fats, Feeding Behavior, Female, Male, Mycoplasma Infections, Mycoplasma gallisepticum, Diet, High-Fat

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A high lipid diet leads to greater pathology and lower tolerance during infection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/2024.08.02.606372
The paper
Perrine, W. G., Sauer, E. L., Love, A. C., Morris, A., Novotny, J., & DuRant, S. E. (2024). A high lipid diet leads to greater pathology and lower tolerance during infection. Journal of Experimental Biology. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.02.606372