PreprintCited by 4CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringBacteriophages and microbial interactionsBacterial Genetics and Biotechnology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

AcrIF11 is a potent CRISPR-specific ADP-ribosyltransferase encoded by phage and plasmid

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1128/mbio.01698-25 · Paper page

Abstract

Phage-encoded anti-CRISPR (Acr) proteins inhibit CRISPR-Cas systems to allow phage replication and lysogeny maintenance. Most of the Acrs characterized to date are stable stoichiometric inhibitors. While enzymatic Acrs have been characterized biochemically, little is known about their potency, specificity, and reversibility. Here, we examine AcrIF11, a widespread phage and plasmid-encoded ADP-ribosyltransferase (ART) that inhibits the Type I-F CRISPR-Cas system. We present an NMR structure of an AcrIF11 homolog that reveals chemical shift perturbations consistent with NAD (cofactor) binding. In experiments that model both lytic phage replication and MGE/lysogen stability under high targeting pressure, AcrIF11 is a highly potent CRISPR-Cas inhibitor and more robust to Cas protein level fluctuations than stoichiometric inhibitors. Furthermore, we demonstrate that AcrIF11 is remarkably specific, predominantly ADP-ribosylating Csy1 when expressed in P. aeruginosa . Given the reversible nature of ADP-ribosylation, we hypothesized that ADPr eraser enzymes (macrodomains) could remove ADPr from Csy1, a potential limitation of PTM-based CRISPR inhibition. We demonstrate that diverse macrodomains can indeed remove the modification from Csy1 in P. aeruginosa lysate. Together, these experiments connect the in vitro observations of AcrIF11’s enzymatic activity to its potent and specific effects in vivo , clarifying the advantages and drawbacks of enzymatic Acrs in the evolutionary arms race between phages and bacteria.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2024.08.26.609590

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 55

  1. 10.1146/annurev-micro-020518-120107 · DOI
  2. 10.1038/s41467-019-10577-3 · DOI
  3. 10.1038/s41586-024-07642-3 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.chom.2019.05.004 · DOI
  5. 10.1038/s41564-020-0692-2 · DOI
  6. 10.1093/nar/gkab1197 · DOI
  7. 10.1038/s41586-019-1909-5 · DOI
  8. An anti-CRISPR protein disables type V Cas12a by acetylation | Nature Structural & Molecular Biology. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41594-019-0206-1.
  9. 2022, Reversible regulation of Cas12a activities by AcrVA5-mediated acetylation and CobB-mediated deacetylation, Cell Discov, 8, 1
  10. 10.1016/j.molcel.2020.09.015 · DOI
  11. Discovery of widespread type I and type V CRISPR-Cas inhibitors | Science. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aau5174?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%20%200pubmed. · DOI
  12. 10.1038/s41586-020-1936-2 · DOI
  13. 10.1021/bi035907z · DOI
  14. 10.1038/embor.2008.90 · DOI
  15. 10.1074/jbc.M201844200 · DOI
  16. 10.1038/s41587-023-01953-y · DOI
  17. 2022, Distinct Subcellular Localization of a Type I CRISPR Complex and the Cas3 Nuclease in Bacteria, J. Bacteriol, 204, e00105
  18. 10.1016/j.cell.2018.06.013 · DOI
  19. 10.1038/nature11723 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.cell.2018.05.058 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.chom.2020.04.002 · DOI
  22. Workman, R. E. et al. Anti-CRISPR proteins trigger a burst of CRISPR-Cas9 expression that enhances phage defense. Cell Rep. 43, (2024). · DOI
  23. 10.1038/s41564-020-0691-3 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.11.014 · DOI
  25. 10.1038/s41564-022-01153-5 · DOI
  26. 10.1038/s41467-020-16703-w · DOI
  27. 10.1002/prot.20264 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq066 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1007/82_2014_417 · DOI
  30. 10.1038/nchembio.2568 · DOI
  31. Duan, N. , Hand, E. , Pheko, M. , Sharma, S. & Emiola, A . Structure-guided discovery of anti-CRISPR and anti-phage defense proteins. Nat. Commun. 15, 649 (2024). · DOI
  32. Cihlova, B. , Lu, Y. , Mikoč, A. , Schuller, M. & Ahel, I . Specificity of DNA ADP-Ribosylation Reversal by NADARs. Toxins 16, 208 (2024). · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.cell.2017.03.012 · DOI
  34. ModA and ModB, Two ADP-Ribosyltransferases Encoded by Bacteriophage T4: Catalytic Properties and Mutation Analysis | Journal of Bacteriology. https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/jb.186.21.7262-7272.2004. · DOI
  35. 10.1002/mrc.1941 · DOI
  36. 10.1007/BF00211777 · DOI
  37. 10.1002/prot.20449 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/j.jmr.2009.11.008 · DOI
  39. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl589 · DOI
  40. 10.1107/S0907444998003254 · DOI
  41. 10.1023/A:1008276004875 · DOI
  42. 10.1093/nar/gkf436 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1093/molbev/msp077 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl529 · DOI
  45. 10.1089/crispr.2018.0043 · DOI
  46. 10.1038/nbt.3988 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1002/PRO.4792 · DOI
  48. 10.1016/j.cell.2017.09.006 · DOI
  49. Weixler, L. et al. Protein and RNA ADP-ribosylation detection is influenced by sample preparation and reagents used. Life Sci. Alliance 6, (2023). · DOI
  50. 10.1126/sciadv.abf8711 · DOI
  51. 10.1002/prot.21165 · DOI
  52. 10.1038/nprot.2007.406 · DOI
  53. 10.1107/S0021889892009944 · DOI · Paper page
  54. 10.1038/356083a0 · DOI
  55. 10.1002/prot.340170404 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Chen, D. F., Roe, L. T., Li, Y., Borges, A. L., Zhang, J. Y., Babbar, P., Maji, S., Stevens, M. G. V., Correy, G. J., Diolaiti, M. E., Smith, D. H., Ashworth, A., Stroud, R. M., Kelly, M. J. S., Bondy-Denomy, J., & Fraser, J. S.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
Fraser, James S.
Venue
mBio
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2024-08-26
Volume
16
Issue
9
Pages
e0169825-e0169825
ISSN
2150-7511 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4413139008
Cited by
4
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2
FWCI
1.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • mBio (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • University of California, San Francisco
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35GM145238, T32GM149436)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (U19AI171110, T32AI060537)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Virology › Bacteriophages and microbial interactions
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
Keywords
anti-CRISPR proteins, ADP-ribosyltransferase, type I-F CRISPR-Cas, ADP-ribosylation, macrodomain, phage-bacteria arms race, lysogeny, phage replication, NAD+ binding, Pseudomonas aeruginosa

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review