PreprintCited by 2Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Integrative multi-omics reveal glial signatures associated with accelerated cognitive decline in Alzheimer’s disease

Open access
Schneegans, Eléonore, Fancy, Nurun, Thomas, Michael, Adair, Emily, Willumsen, Nanet, Papageorgopoulou, Marianna, Chau, Vicky, Cheung, To Ka Dorcas +8 more·2024·medRxiv

Abstract

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterised by progressive cognitive decline and memory loss caused by both genetic and environmental factors. Synapse dysfunction and loss are strongly related to cognitive decline in AD. This study integrates genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic and immunohistological (multi-omics) data and longitudinal cognitive data across several AD cohorts to elucidate the molecular drivers associated with astrocytes and microglia involved in these processes. Our findings demonstrate that activation of microglia and astrocytes occurs in specific cell subsets that are enriched in AD risk genes. Transcriptomic evidence for early microglial activation precedes immunohistological expression of severe neuropathology. Proteomic markers of astrocytic response appear to be most strongly associated with accelerated cognitive decline. However, we also found that brains from donors with a history of more rapid cognitive decline showed evidence for reduced SNAP25-VAMP interactions indicative of synaptic dysfunction, exhibited higher neurotoxic astrocyte reactivity, and were associated with the expression of neuronal markers of injury. Related molecular signatures in cerebrospinal fluid and plasma may provide biomarkers to identify patients at higher risk for rapid cognitive decline. Together, our results connect glial activation to synaptic dysfunction and cognitive decline in AD and highlight roles for microglial activation in the genesis of AD and later astrocyte activation as a potential determinant of clinical symptom progression.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2024.08.27.24312641

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schneegans, E., Fancy, N., Thomas, M., Adair, E., Willumsen, N., Papageorgopoulou, M., Chau, V., Cheung, T. K. D., Muirhead, R. C. J., Whitwell, H., Yagoubi, R., Zhang, X., McGarry, A., Schilder, B. M., Matthews, P. M., & Jackson, J. S.
Affiliations
UK Dementia Research Institute (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Schneegans, Eléonore
  • Jackson, Johanna S
Venue
medRxiv
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2024-08-28
OpenAlex
W4401946397
Cited by
2
References
11
Citations by year
2025: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Alzheimer's Society (AS-DRL-22-008)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, cognitive decline, glial activation, microglia, astrocytes, synaptic dysfunction, cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers, plasma biomarkers, multi-omics integration, neurodegeneration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review