The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Escaping the drug-bias trap: using debiasing design to improve interpretability and generalization of drug-target interaction prediction
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1109/tcbbio.2025.3576488 · Paper page
Abstract
Considering the high cost associated with determining reaction affinities through in-vitro experiments, virtual screening of potential drugs bound with specific protein pockets from vast compounds is critical in AI-assisted drug discovery. Deep-leaning approaches have been proposed for Drug-Target Interaction (DTI) prediction. However, they have shown overestimated accuracy because of the drug-bias trap, a challenge that results from excessive reliance on the drug branch in the traditional drug-protein dual-branch network approach. This casts doubt on the interpretability and generalizability of existing Drug-Target Interaction (DTI) models. Therefore, we introduce UdanDTI, an innovative deep-learning architecture designed specifically for predicting drug-protein interactions. UdanDTI applies an unbalanced dual-branch system and an attentive aggregation module to enhance interpretability from a biological perspective. Across various public datasets, UdanDTI demonstrates outstanding performance, outperforming state-of-the-art models under in-domain, cross-domain, and structural interpretability settings. Notably, it demonstrates exceptional accuracy in predicting drug responses of two crucial subgroups of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) mutations associated with non-small cell lung cancer, consistent with experimental results. Meanwhile, UdanDTI could complement the advanced molecular docking software DiffDock. The codes and datasets of UdanDTI are available at https://github.com/CQ-zhang-2016/UdanDTI .
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 70
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty593 · DOI
- 10.1038/384014a0 · DOI
- 2022, Synthon-based ligand discovery in virtual libraries of over 11 billion compounds, Nature, 601, 452, 10.1038/s41586-021-04220-9 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm580 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn162 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn409 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature08506 · DOI · Paper page
- 2009, Supervised prediction of drug–target interactions using bipartite local models, 25, 2397
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr500 · DOI
- Wang, W. , S. Yang , and J. Li . Drug target predictions based on heterogeneous graph inference. in Pacific symposium on biocomputing. 2013. World Scientific.
- Shi, Y. , et al., Protein-chemical interaction prediction via kernelized sparse learning svm, in Biocomputing 2013. 2013, World Scientific. p. 41–52. · DOI
- 10.1016/j.gpb.2019.04.003 · DOI · Paper page
- 2022, HyperAttentionDTI: improving drug-protein interaction prediction by sequence-based deep learning with attention mechanism, Bioinformatics, 38, 655, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab715 · DOI
- 2019, Compound-protein interaction prediction with end-to-end learning of neural networks for graphs and sequences, Bioinformatics, 35, 309, 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty535 · DOI · Paper page
- 2023, Interpretable bilinear attention network with domain adaptation improves drug–target prediction, Nat Mach Intell, 5, 126, 10.1038/s42256-022-00605-1 · DOI
- Bian, J. , et al., MCANet: shared-weight-based MultiheadCrossAttention network for drug–target interaction prediction. Brief Bioinform, 2023. 24(2). · DOI
- 2021, Identifying drug-target interactions based on graph convolutional network and deep neural network, Brief Bioinform, 22, 2141, 10.1093/bib/bbaa044 · DOI
- 2022, Drug-target interaction predication via multi-channel graph neural networks, Brief Bioinform, 23, bbab346, 10.1093/bib/bbab346 · DOI · Paper page
- 2022, BridgeDPI: a novel Graph Neural Network for predicting drug–protein interactions, Bioinformatics, 38, 2571, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac155 · DOI
- 2023, CPInformer for Efficient and Robust Compound-Protein Interaction Prediction, IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform, 20, 285, 10.1109/TCBB.2022.3144008 · DOI
- 2021, GraphDTA: predicting drug-target binding affinity with graph neural networks, Bioinformatics, 37, 1140, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa921 · DOI
- 2022, Yuel: Improving the Generalizability of Structure-Free Compound-Protein Interaction Prediction, J Chem Inf Model, 62, 463, 10.1021/acs.jcim.1c01531 · DOI
- 2021, DTI-Voodoo: machine learning over interaction networks and ontology-based background knowledge predicts drug-target interactions, Bioinformatics, 37, 4835, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab548 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007129 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa880 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa524 · DOI · Paper page
- Gao, B. , et al., DrugCLIP: Contrasive Protein-Molecule Representation Learning for Virtual Screening, in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 2024.
- 2024, CCL-DTI: contributing the contrastive loss in drug-target interaction prediction, BMC Bioinformatics, 25, 48, 10.1186/s12859-024-05671-3 · DOI
- Dehghan, A. , et al., TripletMultiDTI: Multimodal representation learning in drug-target interaction prediction with triplet loss function. Expert Syst Appl, 2023. 232. · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.2220778120 · DOI
- 10.3390/pharmaceutics14081710 · DOI
- 2022, Affinity2Vec: drug-target binding affinity prediction through representation learning, graph mining, and machine learning, Sci Rep, 12, 4751, 10.1038/s41598-022-08787-9 · DOI
- 2023, Improving the generalizability of protein-ligand binding predictions with AI-Bind, Nat Commun, 14, 1989, 10.1038/s41467-023-37572-z · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00712 · DOI
- 2021, Systematic auditing is essential to debiasing machine learning in biology, Commun Biol, 4, 183, 10.1038/s42003-021-01674-5 · DOI
- 2022, MGraphDTA: deep multiscale graph neural network for explainable drug-target binding affinity prediction, Chem Sci, 13, 816, 10.1039/D1SC05180F · DOI
- 10.1126/science.ade2574 · DOI · Paper page
- 2022, ProtTrans: Toward Understanding the Language of Life Through Self-Supervised Learning, IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell, 44, 7112, 10.1109/TPAMI.2021.3095381 · DOI · Paper page
- Saito, K. , et al. Maximum classifier discrepancy for unsupervised domain adaptation. in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 2018. · DOI
- Bai, P. , et al. Hierarchical clustering split for low-bias evaluation of drug-target interaction prediction. in 2021 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM). 2021. IEEE. · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv256 · DOI
- 2021, Structure-based classification predicts drug response in EGFR-mutant NSCLC, Nature, 597, 732, 10.1038/s41586-021-03898-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 2021, Splitting chemical structure data sets for federated privacy-preserving machine learning, J Cheminform, 13, 96, 10.1186/s13321-021-00576-2 · DOI
- Vaswani, A. , et al., Attention is all you need, in Advances in neural information processing systems. 2017.
- Hou, R. , et al., Cross attention network for few-shot classification, in Advances in neural information processing systems. 2019.
- Lin, H. , et al. Cat: Cross attention in vision transformer. in 2022 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME). 2022. IEEE. · DOI
- Chen, C.-F.R. , Q. Fan , and R. Panda . Crossvit: Cross-attention multi-scale vision transformer for image classification. in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision. 2021. · DOI
- 10.1007/s10822-020-00314-0 · DOI · Paper page
- 2022, Explainable deep drug-target representations for binding affinity prediction, BMC Bioinformatics, 23, 237, 10.1186/s12859-022-04767-y · DOI
- Corso, G. , et al., Diffdock: Diffusion steps, twists, and turns for molecular docking, in International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR). 2022.
- 2016, BindingDB in 2015: a public database for medicinal chemistry, computational chemistry and systems pharmacology, 44, D1045
- Bai, P. , et al. Hierarchical clustering split for low-bias evaluation of drug-target interaction prediction. in 2021 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM). 2021. IEEE. · DOI
- 2021, MolTrans: molecular interaction transformer for drug–target interaction prediction, 37, 830
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv256 · DOI
- 2021, Structure-based classification predicts drug response in EGFR-mutant NSCLC, Nature, 597, 732, 10.1038/s41586-021-03898-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 2010, Hahn, and modeling, Extended-connectivity fingerprints, 50, 742
- 2013, propy: a tool to generate various modes of Chou’s PseAAC, 29, 960
- 2019, DeepConv-DTI: Prediction of drug-target interactions via deep learning with convolution on protein sequences, 15, e1007129
- 2021, GraphDTA: Predicting drug–target binding affinity with graph neural networks, 37, 1140
- 2022, MGraphDTA: deep multiscale graph neural network for explainable drug-target binding affinity prediction, Chem Sci, 13, 816, 10.1039/D1SC05180F · DOI
- Bian, J. , et al., MCANet: shared-weight-based MultiheadCrossAttention network for drug– target interaction prediction. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 2023. 24(2). · DOI
- 2023, Interpretable bilinear attention network with domain adaptation improves drug–target prediction, Nature Machine Intelligence, 5, 126, 10.1038/s42256-022-00605-1 · DOI
- 2022, Yuel: Improving the Generalizability of Structure-Free Compound-Protein Interaction Prediction, J Chem Inf Model, 62, 463, 10.1021/acs.jcim.1c01531 · DOI
- 2021, Splitting chemical structure data sets for federated privacy-preserving machine learning, 13, 1
- Madani, A. , et al., Large language models generate functional protein sequences across diverse families. 2023: p. 1–8. · DOI · Paper page
- 2021, Learning the protein language: Evolution, structure, and function, 12, 654
- 2023, Evolutionary-scale prediction of atomic-level protein structure with a language model, 379, 1123
- 2022, ProtTrans: Toward Understanding the Language of Life Through Self-Supervised Learning, IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell, 44, 7112, 10.1109/TPAMI.2021.3095381 · DOI · Paper page
- 2022, Large-scale chemical language representations capture molecular structure and properties, 4, 1256
- 10.1093/nar/gkaa1100 · DOI · Paper page
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, P.-D., Ma, J., & Chen, T.
- Affiliations
- Tsinghua University (CN)
- Beijing National Research Center for Information Science and Technology (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Ma, Jianzhu
- Chen, Ting
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2024-09-15
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1902-1911
- ISSN
- 1545-5963 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4411019816
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 7
- FWCI
- 6.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Guoqiang Institute, Tsinghua University
- Beijing National Research Center For Information Science And Technology
- National Key Research and Development Program of China (2024YFF1207103, 2024YFF1207100, 2022YFC2703100, 2022YFC2703105)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
- Keywords
- drug-target interaction prediction, interpretability, generalization, dual-branch architecture, virtual screening, EGFR mutation, non-small cell lung cancer, drug response prediction, DiffDock
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review