The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evolution of g-Type Lysozymes in Metazoa: Insights into Immunity and Digestive Adaptations
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.3389/fcell.2024.1487920 · Paper page
Abstract
Exploring the evolutionary dynamics of lysozymes is critical for advancing our knowledge of adaptations in immune and digestive systems. Here, we characterize the distribution of a unique class of lysozymes known as g-type, which hydrolyze key components of bacterial cell walls. Notably, many basal metazoan groups, including ctenophores, sponges, and choanoflagellates (the sister group of Metazoa), lack g-type lysozymes. We reveal a mosaic distribution of these genes, particularly within lophotrochozoans/spiralians, suggesting the lateral gene transfer (LGT) events from predatory myxobacteria played a role in their acquisition, enabling specialized dietary and defensive adaptations. We further identify two major groups of g-type lysozymes based on their widespread distribution in gastropods. Despite their sequence diversity, these lysozymes maintain conserved structural integrity that is crucial for enzymatic activity, underscoring independent evolutionary pathways where g-type lysozymes have developed functionalities typically associated with different lysozyme types in other species. Specifically, using Aplysia californica as a reference species, we identified three distinct g-type lysozyme genes: two are expressed in organs linked to both feeding and defense, and the third exhibits broader distribution, likely associated with immune functions. These findings advance our understanding of the evolutionary dynamics shaping the recruitment and mosaic functional diversification of these enzymes across metazoans, offering new insights into ecological physiology and physiological evolution as emerging fields.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
The ctenophore genome and the evolutionary origins of neural systems
Moroz, L. L., Kocot, K. M., Citarella, M. R., Dosung, S., Norekian, T. P., Povolotskaya, I. S., Grigorenko, A. P., Dailey, C., Berezikov, E., Buckley, K. M., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13400 · Cited by 716
Self-citationThe Genome of the Ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi and Its Implications for Cell Type Evolution
Ryan, J. F., Pang, K., Schnitzler, C. E., Nguyen, A.-D., Moreland, R. T., Simmons, D. K., Koch, B. J., Francis, W. R., Havlak, P., Program, N. C. S., et al. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1242592 · Cited by 682
Ctenophore relationships and their placement as the sister group to all other animals
Whelan, N. V., Kocot, K. M., Moroz, T. P., Mukherjee, K., Williams, P., Paulay, G., Moroz, L. L., & Halanych, K. M. (2017) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-017-0331-3 · Cited by 263
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 66
- 10.1093/sysbio/syr041 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00239-001-0061-6 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.fsi.2013.07.048 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-0348-9225-4_5 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0024619 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41598-021-99172-5 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1092385 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1101/cshperspect.a037028 · DOI
- 10.1007/s12038-010-0015-5 · DOI
- 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1339696 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635 · DOI · Paper page
- 1984, Stomach lysozymes of ruminants. I. Distribution and catalytic properties, J Biol Chem, 259, 11607, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)90907-5 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkv332 · DOI
- 10.1186/1471-2105-5-113 · DOI
- 10.3390/ijms21124523 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tim.2005.08.007 · DOI
- 10.1098/rspb.1922.0023 · DOI
- 10.1038/nbt.1883 · DOI
- 10.1038/303828a0 · DOI
- 10.1093/sysbio/syq010 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/10635150390235520 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cbpb.2012.02.002 · DOI
- 10.1016/s0167-4781(01)00248-2 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-0348-9225-4_4 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-0348-9225-46 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0014-5793(01)02872-1 · DOI
- 10.1186/s12862-014-0188-x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.fsi.2010.02.027 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cbpb.2007.05.005 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.molimm.2009.01.022 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1067020 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1107/S1744309113028170 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkx922 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2022.06.014 · DOI
- 10.1111/1462-2920.16311 · DOI
- 10.1093/icb/42.2.319 · DOI
- 10.1111/ede.12060 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.86.1.133 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkq1189 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cbpb.2006.08.003 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41592-022-01488-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nsb0296-133 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cub.2010.11.028 · DOI
- 10.3389/neuro.24.006.2010 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00018-003-3252-z · DOI
- 10.1016/S1096-4959(03)00174-X · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006512 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/978-1-0716-3642-8_3 · DOI
- 10.1242/dmm.041889 · DOI
- 10.1098/rspb.1967.0038 · DOI
- 10.1242/bio.055699 · DOI
- 10.1093/database/baaa062 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41586-023-05936-6 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3390/md13085276 · DOI
- 10.3390/ijms20225531 · DOI
- 10.1007/s12038-012-9201-y · DOI
- 10.1093/nargab/lqae072 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0045148 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF02100084 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1503453112 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1074/jbc.M504049200 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.dci.2011.06.014 · DOI
- 10.1093/gbe/evab201 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.molimm.2006.06.008 · DOI
- Zou, H. , Song, L. , Xu, W. , & Yang, G. (2005). Molecular cloning and characterization analysis of cDNA encoding g-type lysozyme from scallop (Argopecten irradians). High Technology Letters(15), 101–106.
Metadata
- Authors
- Mukherjee, K., & Moroz, L. L.
- Affiliations
- University of Florida (US)
- Corresponding author
- Mukherjee, Krishanu
- Moroz, Leonid L.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2024-10-04
- Volume
- 12
- Pages
- 1487920-1487920
- ISSN
- 2296-634X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11576321
- OpenAlex
- W4404120635
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4
- FWCI
- 1.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (2341882)
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS114491)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Invertebrate Immune Response Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Marine Invertebrate Physiology and Ecology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Keywords
- g-type lysozyme, horizontal gene transfer, myxobacteria, lophotrochozoans, Gastropoda, Aplysia californica, immune function, digestive adaptation, animal evolution
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review