PreprintCited by 4Protein Structure and DynamicsReceptor Mechanisms and SignalingCAR-T cell therapy research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Exploring structure-function relationships in engineered receptor performance using computational structure prediction

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1089/genbio.2024.0057 · Paper page

Abstract

Engineered receptors play increasingly important roles in transformative cell-based therapies. However, the structural mechanisms that drive differences in performance across receptor designs are often poorly understood. Recent advances in protein structural prediction tools have enabled the modeling of virtually any user-defined protein, but how these tools might build understanding of engineered receptors has yet to be fully explored. In this study, we employed structural modeling tools to perform post hoc analyses to investigate whether predicted structural features might explain observed functional variation. We selected a recently reported library of receptors derived from natural cytokine receptors as a case study, generated structural models, and from these predictions quantified a set of structural features that plausibly impact receptor performance. Encouragingly, for a subset of receptors, structural features explained considerable variation in performance, and trends were largely conserved across structurally diverse receptor sets. This work indicates potential for structure prediction-guided synthetic receptor engineering.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2024.11.07.622438

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 46

  1. 10.1126/science.aar6711 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1188049 · DOI
  3. 10.1038/s41577-024-01035-3 · DOI
  4. 10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002907 · DOI
  5. 10.1038/s41589-021-00926-z · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.omtm.2018.12.009 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.cell.2016.01.012 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.cell.2016.09.011 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.cell.2022.03.023 · DOI
  10. 10.1038/s41589-018-0046-z · DOI
  11. 10.1021/sb400128g · DOI
  12. 10.1038/nchembio.2253 · DOI
  13. 10.1038/s41591-021-01326-5 · DOI
  14. 10.1038/s41467-023-37616-4 · DOI
  15. 10.1038/s41467-021-25605-4 · DOI
  16. 10.1111/febs.13793 · DOI
  17. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c01035 · DOI
  18. 10.3390/cryst13040710 · DOI
  19. 10.1038/s41586-024-07487-w · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1101/2021.10.04.463034 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1126/science.abj8754 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1021/acs.jcim.3c00926 · DOI
  23. 10.1158/2159-8290.Cd-23-1393 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1101/2024.03.23.586421 · DOI
  25. 10.1038/s41589-020-00729-8 · DOI
  26. 10.1038/s41592-022-01488-1 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1038/s41596-024-01060-5 · DOI
  28. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt645 · DOI
  29. 10.1021/ja303483k · DOI
  30. 10.7554/eLife.13876 · DOI
  31. 10.1038/s41467-024-45499-2 · DOI
  32. 10.1073/pnas.0914052107 · DOI
  33. 10.1093/synbio/ysaa017 · DOI
  34. 10.7554/eLife.75660 · DOI
  35. 10.1126/science.288.5475.2351 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1055 · DOI
  37. 10.3389/fcell.2019.00091 · DOI
  38. 10.1126/scisignal.2000954 · DOI
  39. 10.1128/MCB.06458-11 · DOI
  40. 10.1093/emboj/16.19.5894 · DOI
  41. 10.1074/jbc.273.48.31770 · DOI
  42. 10.1016/j.cellsig.2018.09.002 · DOI
  43. 10.3390/cancers14112603 · DOI
  44. 10.1038/s41392-023-01680-5 · DOI
  45. 10.1016/j.cels.2023.05.007 · DOI
  46. 10.1002/pro.4792 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Corcoran, W. K., Cosio, A., Edelstein, H. I., & Leonard, J. N.
Affiliations
Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
Leonard, Joshua N.
Venue
GEN Biotechnology
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2024-11-07
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
37-55
ISSN
2768-1556 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4407624598
Cited by
4
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2
FWCI
1.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • GEN Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1842165)
  • Northwestern University (DGE-1842165)
  • National Institutes of Health (2r01eb026510-05a1)
  • University of California, San Francisco
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM129325, T32GM008449)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (R01EB026510)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › CAR-T cell therapy research
Keywords
engineered receptors, structure-function relationship, protein structure prediction, cytokine receptors, cell therapy, structural features, post hoc analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Exploring structure-function relationships in engineered receptor performance using computational structure prediction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/2024.11.07.622438
The paper
Corcoran, W. K., Cosio, A., Edelstein, H. I., & Leonard, J. N. (2024). Exploring structure-function relationships in engineered receptor performance using computational structure prediction. GEN Biotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.07.622438