PreprintCited by 16Computational Drug Discovery MethodsMachine Learning in BioinformaticsProtein Degradation and Inhibitors

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

CASTER-DTA: Equivariant Graph Neural Networks for Predicting Drug-Target Affinity

Open access
Kumar, Rachit, Romano, Joseph D., Ritchie, Marylyn D.·2024·Briefings in Bioinformatics

Preprint — published as 10.1093/bib/bbaf554

Abstract

Accurately determining the binding affinity of a ligand with a protein is important for drug design, development, and screening. With the advent of accessible protein structure prediction methods such as AlphaFold, predicted protein 3D structures are readily available; however, methods for predicting binding affinity currently do not take full advantage of 3D protein information. Here, we present CASTER-DTA (Cross-Attention with Structural Target Equivariant Representations for Drug-Target Affinity), which uses an equivariant graph neural network to learn more robust protein representations alongside a standard graph neural network to learn molecular representations to predict drug-target affinity. We augment these representations by incorporating an attention-based mechanism between protein residues and drug atoms to improve interpretability. We show that CASTER-DTA represents a state-of-the-art improvement on multiple benchmarks for predicting drug-target affinity and that it generates novel insights for several related tasks. We then apply CASTER-DTA to create a large resource of the binding affinities of every FDA-approved drug against every protein in the human proteome and make these predictions freely available for download. We also make available a web server for researchers to apply a pretrained CASTER-DTA model for predicting binding affinities between arbitrary proteins and drugs. Key Messages: CASTER-DTA is a novel architecture that makes use of equivariant graph neural networks to predict drug-target affinity, enabling rapid and interpretable predictions about how proteins and molecules bind to each other. Equivariant graph neural networks like those used in CASTER-DTA allow for more robust usage of protein 3D structural information and improve performance over non-equivariant approaches. CASTER-DTA includes a cross-attention layer to update protein residue and molecule atom embeddings that allows for interpretability about which residues are involved in the prediction. We can use this architecture for a variety of downstream tasks, and we have used CASTER-DTA to generate a resource of predicted binding affinities for every FDA-approved drug against every protein in the human proteome.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2024.11.25.625281

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. 2019, Binding affinity in drug design: experimental and computational techniques, Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery, 14, 755, 10.1080/17460441.2019.1623202 · DOI
  2. 2023, Attentiondta: Drug–target binding affinity prediction by sequence-based deep learning with attention mechanism, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, 20, 852, 10.1109/TCBB.2022.3170365 · DOI
  3. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty593 · DOI
  4. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa921 · DOI
  5. 2020, RSC Advances, 10, 20701
  6. 2021, Equivariant Graph Neural Networks for 3D Macromolecular Structure
  7. 2021, Learning from Protein Structure with Geometric Vector Perceptrons
  8. 2023, Nature Communications, 14, 1177
  9. 10.1038/nbt.1990 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1021/ci400709d · DOI
  11. 2011, Navigating the kinome, Nature Chemical Biology, 7, 200, 10.1038/nchembio.530 · DOI
  12. 10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 2022, Nature Methods, 19, 679
  14. 2019, How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?
  15. 2020, Strategies for Pre-training Graph Neural Networks
  16. 2018, Graph Attention Networks
  17. 2022, How Attentive are Graph Attention Networks?
  18. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b00959 · DOI
  19. 10.1093/nar/gks966 · DOI
  20. 2021, Pharmgkb, an integrated resource of pharmacogenomic knowledge, Current Protocols, 1, e226, 10.1002/cpz1.226 · DOI
  21. 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00675 · DOI
  22. 10.1160/TH12-03-0151 · DOI
  23. 10.1001/jama.293.12.1485 · DOI
  24. 2022, Slco1b1*5 allele is associated with atorvastatin discontinuation and adverse muscle symptoms in the context of routine care, Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 111, 1075, 10.1002/cpt.2527 · DOI
  25. 10.1038/s41397-021-00208-w · DOI
  26. 10.1073/pnas.1615613114 · DOI
  27. 2012, The effect of hiv protease inhibitors on amyloid-beta peptide degradation and synthesis in human cells and alzheimer’s disease animal model, Journal of Neuroimmune Pharmacology: The Official Journal of the Society on NeuroImmune Pharmacology, 7, 412, 10.1007/s11481-011-9304-5 · DOI
  28. 2019, Rapamycin confers neuroprotection against aging-induced oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, and neurodegeneration in old rats through activation of autophagy, Rejuvenation Research, 22, 60, 10.1089/rej.2018.2070 · DOI
  29. 2016, Drug repurposing identifies inhibitors of oseltamivir-resistant influenza viruses, Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 55, 3438, 10.1002/anie.201511361 · DOI
  30. 10.1371/journal.pone.0013169 · DOI
  31. 10.3390/v15051128 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Kumar, R., Romano, J. D., & Ritchie, M. D.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Kumar, Rachit
Venue
Briefings in Bioinformatics
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2024-11-28
Volume
26
Issue
5
ISSN
1467-5463 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4415614836
Cited by
16
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 4
FWCI
8.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Briefings in Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (U01AG066833)
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (T32HG000046)
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (P30ES013508)
  • U.S. National Library of Medicine (R00LM013646)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
Keywords
drug-target affinity prediction, binding affinity, equivariant graph neural networks, protein representation, molecular representation, cross-attention, protein structure, drug design, human proteome, FDA-approved drugs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review