PreprintCited by 3Heat shock proteins researchProtein Structure and DynamicsPhysiological and biochemical adaptations

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pervasive divergence in protein thermostability is mediated by both structural changes and cellular environments

Open access
Walunjkar, Nilima, Lai, Timothy Y., Akhter, Nasima, Miller, James H., Bettinger, John Q., Marcus, Erin, Phizicky, Eric M., Ghaemmaghami, Sina, Fay, Justin C.·2024·Molecular Biology and Evolution

Preprint — published as 10.1093/molbev/msaf137 · Paper page

Abstract

Temperature is a universal environmental constraint and organisms have evolved diverse mechanisms of thermotolerance. A central feature of thermophiles relative to mesophiles is a universal shift in protein stability, implying that it is a major constituent of thermotolerance. However, organisms have also evolved extensive buffering systems, such as those that disaggregate and refold denatured proteins and enable survival of heat shock. Here, we show that both cellular and protein structural changes contribute to divergence in protein thermostability between two closely related Saccharomyces species that differ by 8°C in their thermotolerance. Using thermal proteomic profiling we find that 85% of S. cerevisiae proteins are more stable than their S. uvarum homologs and there is an average shift of 1.6°C in temperature induced protein aggregation. In an interspecific hybrid of the two species, S. cerevisiae proteins retain their thermostability, while the thermostability of their S. uvarum homologs is enhanced, indicating that cellular context contributes to protein stability differences. By purifying orthologous proteins we show that amino acid substitutions underlie melting temperature differences for two proteins, Guk1 and Aha1. Amino acid substitutions are also computationally predicted to contribute to stability differences for most of the proteome. Our results imply that coordinated changes in protein thermostability impose a significant constraint on the time scales over which thermotolerance can evolve.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2024.12.09.627561

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 81

  1. 10.1016/j.cell.2017.02.027 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.cell.2020.04.009 · DOI
  3. 10.1146/annurev.physiol.61.1.243 · DOI
  4. 10.1146/annurev.ge.27.120193.002253 · DOI
  5. 10.1038/s41467-024-47355-9 · DOI
  6. 10.1038/s41592-020-0801-4 · DOI
  7. 10.1126/science.aai7825 · DOI
  8. 10.1080/20014091074174 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.03.069 · DOI
  10. 10.1073/pnas.1614437114 · DOI
  11. 10.1038/nrg1672 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.06.154 · DOI
  13. 10.1073/pnas.95.22.12809 · DOI
  14. 10.1073/pnas.0407499102 · DOI
  15. 10.1126/science.aan0346 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1126/science.1255784 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1073/pnas.0801340105 · DOI
  18. 10.1002/pro.3 · DOI
  19. 10.1146/annurev-micro-020518-115515 · DOI
  20. 10.1002/prot.10016 · DOI
  21. 10.1146/annurev.ph.57.030195.000355 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.sbi.2009.08.003 · DOI
  23. 10.1038/nature08009 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.jmb.2013.06.028 · DOI
  25. 10.1242/jeb.114298 · DOI
  26. 10.1038/srep27003 · DOI
  27. 10.1126/science.aay2784 · DOI
  28. 10.1074/jbc.M110.103374 · DOI
  29. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1999.tb03774.x · DOI
  30. 10.1038/nclimate2628 · DOI
  31. 10.1111/eva.13270 · DOI
  32. 10.17912/micropub.biology.000831 · DOI
  33. 10.1093/molbev/msy077 · DOI
  34. 10.1126/science.1258137 · DOI
  35. 10.1110/ps.062130306 · DOI
  36. 10.15252/msb.20188242 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.cell.2018.03.053 · DOI
  38. 10.1186/s12866-018-1320-7 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/j.cell.2018.10.023 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1128/AEM.01861-10 · DOI
  41. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.11.083 · DOI
  42. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2008.01480.x · DOI
  43. 10.1371/journal.pone.0020739 · DOI
  44. 10.1038/s41592-022-01488-1 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1088/1361-6463/abedfb · DOI
  46. 10.1002/bip.360261104 · DOI
  47. 10.1098/rstb.2006.1907 · DOI
  48. 10.1093/gbe/evx072 · DOI
  49. 10.1073/pnas.0510098103 · DOI
  50. 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001994 · DOI
  51. 10.1146/annurev-biophys-070816-033819 · DOI
  52. 10.7554/eLife.75842 · DOI
  53. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008079 · DOI
  54. 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)35654-0 · DOI
  55. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006184 · DOI
  56. 10.1073/pnas.1114477108 · DOI · Paper page
  57. 10.1038/s41588-018-0243-4 · DOI
  58. 10.1046/j.1432-1327.1999.00916.x · DOI
  59. 10.1074/jbc.M212761200 · DOI
  60. 10.1534/g3.111.000273 · DOI
  61. 10.1093/nar/gky1001 · DOI
  62. 10.1074/mcp.M115.057505 · DOI
  63. 10.1016/j.cell.2015.08.041 · DOI
  64. 10.1016/j.cels.2017.12.004 · DOI
  65. 10.1007/s10969-009-9068-9 · DOI
  66. 10.1038/nprot.2006.204 · DOI
  67. 10.1093/genetics/156.3.953 · DOI
  68. 10.1016/j.febslet.2007.02.008 · DOI
  69. 10.1016/s0141-0229(00)00159-9 · DOI
  70. 10.1073/pnas.0906160106 · DOI
  71. 10.1007/BF02354821 · DOI
  72. 10.1002/yea.3098 · DOI
  73. 10.17912/micropub.biology.000399 · DOI
  74. 10.1074/jbc.M303736200 · DOI
  75. 10.1371/journal.pone.0271709 · DOI
  76. 10.1093/gbe/evad207 · DOI
  77. 10.1093/nar/gkh340 · DOI · Paper page
  78. 10.1186/s12859-019-2923-1 · DOI · Paper page
  79. 10.3390/genes12060911 · DOI
  80. 10.1093/bib/bbab555 · DOI
  81. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt473 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Walunjkar, N., Lai, T. Y., Akhter, N., Miller, J. H., Bettinger, J. Q., Marcus, E., Phizicky, E. M., Ghaemmaghami, S., & Fay, J. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Rochester (US)
  • University of Rochester Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Fay, Justin C.
Venue
Molecular Biology and Evolution
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2024-12-11
Volume
42
Issue
7
ISSN
0737-4038 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4411095161
Cited by
3
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2
FWCI
0.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Biology and Evolution (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Rochester
  • National Institutes of Health (1s10od025242-01)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM080669, R01GM052347, R35GM119502)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Heat shock proteins research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Physiological and biochemical adaptations
Keywords
protein thermal stability, heat tolerance, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Saccharomyces uvarum, interspecific hybrids, thermal proteome profiling, protein melting temperature, amino acid substitutions, Aha1, cellular context, protein refolding, heat shock, thermophilic adaptation
MeSH terms
Thermotolerance, Fungal Proteins, Saccharomyces, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Evolution, Molecular, Amino Acid Substitution, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Proteomics, Protein Stability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review