The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pervasive divergence in protein thermostability is mediated by both structural changes and cellular environments
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1093/molbev/msaf137 · Paper page
Abstract
Temperature is a universal environmental constraint and organisms have evolved diverse mechanisms of thermotolerance. A central feature of thermophiles relative to mesophiles is a universal shift in protein stability, implying that it is a major constituent of thermotolerance. However, organisms have also evolved extensive buffering systems, such as those that disaggregate and refold denatured proteins and enable survival of heat shock. Here, we show that both cellular and protein structural changes contribute to divergence in protein thermostability between two closely related Saccharomyces species that differ by 8°C in their thermotolerance. Using thermal proteomic profiling we find that 85% of S. cerevisiae proteins are more stable than their S. uvarum homologs and there is an average shift of 1.6°C in temperature induced protein aggregation. In an interspecific hybrid of the two species, S. cerevisiae proteins retain their thermostability, while the thermostability of their S. uvarum homologs is enhanced, indicating that cellular context contributes to protein stability differences. By purifying orthologous proteins we show that amino acid substitutions underlie melting temperature differences for two proteins, Guk1 and Aha1. Amino acid substitutions are also computationally predicted to contribute to stability differences for most of the proteome. Our results imply that coordinated changes in protein thermostability impose a significant constraint on the time scales over which thermotolerance can evolve.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Varadi, M., Bertoni, D., Magana, P., Paramval, U., Pidruchna, I., Radhakrishnan, M., Tsenkov, M., Nair, S., Mirdita, M., Yeo, J., et al. (2024) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011 · Cited by 2,052
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 81
- 10.1016/j.cell.2017.02.027 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2020.04.009 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.physiol.61.1.243 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.ge.27.120193.002253 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-024-47355-9 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41592-020-0801-4 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.aai7825 · DOI
- 10.1080/20014091074174 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.03.069 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1614437114 · DOI
- 10.1038/nrg1672 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.06.154 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.95.22.12809 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0407499102 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.aan0346 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.1255784 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.0801340105 · DOI
- 10.1002/pro.3 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev-micro-020518-115515 · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.10016 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.ph.57.030195.000355 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.sbi.2009.08.003 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature08009 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jmb.2013.06.028 · DOI
- 10.1242/jeb.114298 · DOI
- 10.1038/srep27003 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.aay2784 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M110.103374 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1999.tb03774.x · DOI
- 10.1038/nclimate2628 · DOI
- 10.1111/eva.13270 · DOI
- 10.17912/micropub.biology.000831 · DOI
- 10.1093/molbev/msy077 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1258137 · DOI
- 10.1110/ps.062130306 · DOI
- 10.15252/msb.20188242 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2018.03.053 · DOI
- 10.1186/s12866-018-1320-7 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2018.10.023 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1128/AEM.01861-10 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.11.083 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2008.01480.x · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0020739 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41592-022-01488-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1088/1361-6463/abedfb · DOI
- 10.1002/bip.360261104 · DOI
- 10.1098/rstb.2006.1907 · DOI
- 10.1093/gbe/evx072 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0510098103 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001994 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev-biophys-070816-033819 · DOI
- 10.7554/eLife.75842 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008079 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)35654-0 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006184 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1114477108 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41588-018-0243-4 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1432-1327.1999.00916.x · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M212761200 · DOI
- 10.1534/g3.111.000273 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gky1001 · DOI
- 10.1074/mcp.M115.057505 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2015.08.041 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cels.2017.12.004 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10969-009-9068-9 · DOI
- 10.1038/nprot.2006.204 · DOI
- 10.1093/genetics/156.3.953 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.febslet.2007.02.008 · DOI
- 10.1016/s0141-0229(00)00159-9 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0906160106 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF02354821 · DOI
- 10.1002/yea.3098 · DOI
- 10.17912/micropub.biology.000399 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M303736200 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0271709 · DOI
- 10.1093/gbe/evad207 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkh340 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1186/s12859-019-2923-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3390/genes12060911 · DOI
- 10.1093/bib/bbab555 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt473 · DOI · Paper page
Metadata
- Authors
- Walunjkar, N., Lai, T. Y., Akhter, N., Miller, J. H., Bettinger, J. Q., Marcus, E., Phizicky, E. M., Ghaemmaghami, S., & Fay, J. C.
- Affiliations
- University of Rochester (US)
- University of Rochester Medicine (US)
- Corresponding author
- Fay, Justin C.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Molecular Biology and Evolution
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2024-12-11
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 7
- ISSN
- 0737-4038 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC12227239
- OpenAlex
- W4411095161
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2
- FWCI
- 0.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Molecular Biology and Evolution (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Rochester
- National Institutes of Health (1s10od025242-01)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM080669, R01GM052347, R35GM119502)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Heat shock proteins research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Physiological and biochemical adaptations
- Keywords
- protein thermal stability, heat tolerance, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Saccharomyces uvarum, interspecific hybrids, thermal proteome profiling, protein melting temperature, amino acid substitutions, Aha1, cellular context, protein refolding, heat shock, thermophilic adaptation
- MeSH terms
- Thermotolerance, Fungal Proteins, Saccharomyces, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Evolution, Molecular, Amino Acid Substitution, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Proteomics, Protein Stability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review