The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
eDNA provides accurate population abundance estimates with bioenergetics and particle mass-balance modelling
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1111/mec.70329
Abstract
Anthropogenic activities have led to an unprecedented crisis in freshwater biodiversity loss. The capacity to monitor the abundance of wild populations is critical to conserving biodiversity, but conventional physical specimen collection methods are invasive, costly, and labour-intensive. Environmental DNA (eDNA) offers a promising alternative, being easy to sample, with studies under controlled laboratory conditions showing consistent correlations between eDNA concentration and abundance. However, applying eDNA to monitor abundance remains contentious, as eDNA particle dynamics and the ecology of eDNA production can decouple this relationship in natural ecosystems. To address this, we provide a novel modeling method to produce population estimates from eDNA. We integrated bioenergetics and mass-balance frameworks to relate eDNA concentrations to freshwater fish population abundance estimated through conventional mark-recapture in Brook Trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) across nine Rocky Mountains lakes, five of which underwent size-selective harvesting over two years. Our integrated framework improved the variance explained in eDNA concentrations from 24% to 71%. The integrated model accurately distinguished most (94%) abundance estimates across populations and sampling periods, detecting both natural and harvest-induced reductions in abundance within several populations. This study is the first to empirically integrate the DNA production mechanism and particle dynamics and provide a new methodological approach enabling rapid and accurate abundance quantification. We also discuss how this new tool can be integrated in existing monitoring programs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 65 · Cited by 8
Research works printed but not linked: 63
- 10.1073/pnas.1420819112 · DOI
- 10.1111/1755-0998.13751 · DOI
- 10.32614/rj-2018-017 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.18637/jss.v045.i03 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/lol2.10213 · DOI
- 10.3390/quat4010006 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1813843115 · DOI
- 10.1002/edn3.266 · DOI
- 10.1080/03632415.2017.1377558 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0162755 · DOI
- 10.1098/rsbl.2008.0118 · DOI
- 10.3390/d15050631 · DOI
- 10.1002/edn3.341 · DOI
- 10.1577/T05-243.1 · DOI
- 10.3389/fenvs.2023.1193393 · DOI
- 10.3390/w11071462 · DOI
- 10.1139/cjfas-2023-0011 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116310 · DOI
- Hubert, W. A. , Pope, K. L. , & Dettmers, J. M . (2012). Passive capture techniques. In A. V. Zale , D. L. Parrish , & T. . Sutton (Eds.), Fisheries Techniques (3rd ed.). American Fisheries Society. · DOI
- 10.1111/1755-0998.12285 · DOI
- 10.1111/jfb.14218 · DOI
- 10.1111/1755-0998.13354 · DOI
- 10.1002/ece3.4802 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10750-022-05036-y · DOI
- 10.1139/f83-125 · DOI
- 10.1111/1755-0998.13655 · DOI
- 10.1002/edn3.432 · DOI
- Krebs, C. J . (2009). Estimating Abundance in Animal and Plant Populations. In Ecology: The experimental analysis of distribution and abundance (6th ed.). Pearson Benjamin Cummings.
- 10.1111/1755-0998.13627 · DOI
- 10.1111/mec.15623 · DOI
- Littlefair, J. E. , Rennie, M. D. , & Cristescu, M. E . (2021). Environmental nucleic acids: a field-based comparison for monitoring freshwater habitats using eDNA and eRNA. BioRxiv, 2021.12.01.469845. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.12.01.469845v1%0Ahttps://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.12.01.469845v1.abstract · DOI
- 10.1111/1365-2664.14420 · DOI
- McElreath, R . (2018). Statistical rethinking: A Bayesian course with examples in R and Stan (Chapman an). · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/fwb.12062 · DOI
- Ogle, D. H. (2015). Introductory Fisheries Analyses with R. Chapman & Hall. · DOI
- 10.1139/f03-011 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41598-024-66732-4 · DOI
- 10.1111/1755-0998.13934 · DOI
- 10.2307/2657235 · DOI
- 10.1577/1548-8446(2002)027<0006:CRF>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1002/edn3.185 · DOI
- 10.3389/fevo.2021.623831 · DOI
- 10.1002/edn3.192 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.est.6b03114 · DOI
- 10.1080/00029890.1938.11990818 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tree.2020.03.011 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41598-017-05223-1 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10531-019-01709-8 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.11.038 · DOI
- 10.3389/fevo.2021.623718 · DOI
- 10.1577/1548-8659(1978)107<284 · DOI
- 10.1080/11250003.2016.1274436 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10750-023-05398-x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.11.017 · DOI
- 10.1002/ecy.1582 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.fishres.2012.07.011 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0059520 · DOI
- 10.1111/mec.16202 · DOI
- 10.1002/edn3.7 · DOI
- 10.1111/mec.15543 · DOI
- 10.1002/edn3.150 · DOI
- 10.1002/edn3.381 · DOI
- 10.1051/kmae/2011016 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Beaulieu, J., Yates, M. C., Fraser, D. J., Cristescu, M. E., & Derry, A. M.
- Affiliations
- Université du Québec à Montréal (CA)
- Concordia University (CA)
- McGill University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Beaulieu, Julien
- Venue
- Molecular Ecology
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2024-12-23
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- e70329-e70329
- ISSN
- 0962-1083 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W7144033276
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 65
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 24.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Molecular Ecology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- NSERC
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
- Keywords
- environmental DNA, population abundance estimation, freshwater fish, brook trout, mark-recapture, size-selective harvesting, biodiversity monitoring
- MeSH terms
- DNA, Environmental, Extrachromosomal DNA, Animals, Energy Metabolism, Genetics, Population, Models, Biological, Population Density, Trout, Ecosystem, Biodiversity, Lakes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: eDNA provides accurate population abundance estimates with bioenergetics and particle mass-balance modelling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/2024.12.23.629923
- The paper
- Beaulieu, J., Yates, M. C., Fraser, D. J., Cristescu, M. E., & Derry, A. M. (2024). eDNA provides accurate population abundance estimates with bioenergetics and particle mass-balance modelling. Molecular Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.12.23.629923