The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Tandem duplication of serpin genes yields functional variation and snake venom inhibitors
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1093/molbev/msaf290 · Paper page
Abstract
Tandem duplication of genes can play a critical role in the evolution of functional novelty, but our understanding is limited concerning gene duplication’s role in coevolution between species. Much is known about the evolution and function of tandemly duplicated snake venom genes, however the potential of gene duplication to fuel venom resistance within prey species is poorly understood. In this study, we characterize patterns of gene duplication of the SERPINA subfamily of genes across in vertebrates and experimentally characterize functional variation in the SERPINA3-like paralogs of a wild rodent. We find the hallmarks of rapid birth-death evolution of SERPINA1-like and SERPINA3-like genes within and between rodent lineages. Next, we recombinantly expressed the 2 paralogous duplicates of SERPINA1 and 12 paralogous duplicates of SERPINA3 found in the genome of the big-eared woodrat ( Neotoma macrotis ), a species known to be resistant to protease-rich rattlesnake venoms. We found that two SERPINA3 paralogs inhibit snake venom serine proteases, indicating that these proteins have potential as resistance factors in SERPIN-mediated venom resistance. In addition, functional variation is apparent among paralogs, including neofunctionalization to inhibit both chymotrypsin-like and and trypsin-like proteases simultaneously for one venom-inhibiting paralog. Our results provide further evidence that the rapid evolution of SERPINA1 and SERPINA3 gene copy number across rodents has adaptive potential by producing functionally-diverse inhibitors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 58
- 10.1038/s41587-019-0036-z · DOI
- 10.1006/jmbi.1990.9999 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01793.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.toxcx.2023.100179 · DOI
- 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a004130 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0888-7543(02)96864-3 · DOI
- 10.1086/376580 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0041-0101(99)00179-8 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.88.21.9417 · DOI
- 10.1554/0014-3820(2002)056[2067:TEROPT]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1186/s12915-023-01673-4 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tree.2012.10.020 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jprot.2021.104464 · DOI
- 10.1016/0041-0101(82)90119-2 · DOI
- 10.1016/0041-0101(87)90260-1 · DOI
- 10.1002/bies.080085 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cub.2016.07.038 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkh340 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0888-7543(02)00041-1 · DOI
- 10.1021/cr010170+ · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.R800064200 · DOI
- 10.1111/mec.15529 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ympev.2008.04.008 · DOI
- 10.1093/jhered/esp047 · DOI
- 10.1186/1479-7364-7-22 · DOI
- 10.1098/rspb.2015.2841 · DOI
- 10.1093/icb/icw082 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00239-004-2640-9 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2011.04360.x · DOI
- 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb07945.x · DOI
- 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)68544-8 · DOI
- Keil, B. , 2012. Specificity of Proteolysis. Springer Science & Business Media.
- 10.1038/s41587-019-0201-4 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/molbev/msac174 · DOI
- 10.3390/genes11091046 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.270.43.25309 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0041-0101(98)00126-3 · DOI
- 10.1093/molbev/msaa141 · DOI
- 10.1002/jez.b.23145 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0041-0101(00)00090-8 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac062 · DOI
- 10.1016/0041-0101(78)90039-9 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0167-4838(98)00085-5 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.toxicon.2016.05.003 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00166159 · DOI
- 10.1111/jeb.13907 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkab1112 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/pro.3794 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.toxicon.2012.09.003 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkac1052 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/22.22.4673 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cub.2005.11.046 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0195077 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00341.x · DOI
- 10.1093/molbev/msx334 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.chempr.2022.11.018 · DOI
- 10.1093/molbev/msad269 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1992.tb00658.x · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Ward, M. S., Holding, M. L., Haynes, L. M., & Ginsburg, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- Corresponding author
- Holding, Matthew L.
- Venue
- Molecular Biology and Evolution
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2025-01-10
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 11
- ISSN
- 0737-4038 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11741322
- OpenAlex
- W4416665694
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 1.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Molecular Biology and Evolution (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (1r35hl171421-01)
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R35 HL171421)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Venomous Animal Envenomation and Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
- Keywords
- tandem gene duplication, SERPINA1, alpha-1-antichymotrypsin, copy number evolution, diversifying selection, neofunctionalization, Neotoma macrotis, rattlesnake venom, paralogs
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review