PreprintCited by 5Mass Spectrometry Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsProtein Structure and Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

AlphaCross-XL: a seamless tool for automated and proteome-scale mapping of crosslinked peptides onto three-dimensional protein structures

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1016/j.mcpro.2025.101057 · Paper page

Abstract

Crosslinking mass spectrometry (XL-MS) is an exciting proteomics technology to capture native protein conformations in real time within biological systems. Historically, however, implementation of this technology has typically been limited to single purified recombinant proteins or in vitro assembled protein complexes. These limitations are associated with inherent challenges in XL-MS analysis, including extremely low abundance of crosslinked (XL) peptides and complex deconvolution of XL peptide-derived spectral data. However, impressive recent developments in computation and instrumentation have now made it feasible to address biological questions using proteome-wide XL-MS analysis. Although some XL mapping software tools exist, these require manual input of specific Protein Data Bank (PDB) structures at the single protein level, and do not function at the high throughput scale required to analyze datasets derived from thousands of proteins. To address this need, we therefore sought to develop a strategy enabling automated mapping of XL peptides onto the three-dimensional (3D) structures of proteins, at a proteome-wide scale. Herein we describe AlphaCross-XL, a first-in-class seamless computational tool for automated mapping of XL peptides onto the protein structures for intra-protein crosslinks and loop-links. The AlphaCross-XL software first retrieves protein structures from the AlphaFold Protein Structure Database and maps all the identified crosslinks onto the 3D structure. It also calculates the Euclidian distance between the crosslinked residues and reports the violated and satisfied crosslink distances based on a user-defined distance threshold, which is visually discriminated by color in PyMOL. Lastly, the tool also supports further validation of user-submitted protein structures, that can include any computer-predicted protein structure and experimentally derived protein structures (i.e., from PDB). AlphaCross-XL is available at https://github.com/sanjyotshenoy/alphacross-xl .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2025.01.21.633663

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. 10.1038/s43018-023-00652-6 · DOI
  2. 10.1126/sciadv.aay6350 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.tibs.2015.10.008 · DOI
  4. 10.1038/nprot.2013.168 · DOI
  5. 10.1074/mcp.M110.002212 · DOI
  6. 10.1021/acscentsci.9b00416 · DOI
  7. Gutierrez, C. et al. Enabling Photoactivated Cross-Linking Mass Spectrometric Analysis of Protein Complexes by Novel MS-Cleavable Cross-Linkers. Mol Cell Proteomics 20, (2021). · DOI
  8. 10.1021/acs.analchem.3c01369 · DOI
  9. 10.1021/acs.jproteome.9b00541 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.cels.2017.10.017 · DOI
  11. Wheat, A. et al. Protein interaction landscapes revealed by advanced in vivo cross-linking-mass spectrometry. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 118, (2021). · DOI
  12. 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b04431 · DOI
  13. 10.1093/NAR/GKAB1061 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Chen, Z. L. et al. A high-speed search engine pLink 2 with systematic evaluation for proteome-scale identification of cross-linked peptides. Nat Commun 10, (2019). · DOI
  15. 10.1021/pr501321h · DOI
  16. Clasen, M. A. et al. Proteome-scale recombinant standards and a robust high-speed search engine to advance cross-linking MS-based interactomics. Nat Methods 21, (2024). · DOI
  17. 10.15252/msb.20198994 · DOI
  18. 10.1021/acs.analchem.2c05141 · DOI
  19. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr168 · DOI
  20. Du, L. et al. Pyfastx: A robust Python package for fast random access to sequences from plain and gzipped FASTA/Q files. Brief Bioinform 22, (2021). · DOI
  21. Berman, H. M. , et al. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Research vol. 28 http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/status.html (2000). · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1021/ACS.CHEMREV.1C00786 · DOI
  23. 10.1074/mcp.M111.014126 · DOI
  24. 10.1038/s41587-023-01704-z · DOI
  25. Manalastas-Cantos, K. et al. Modeling Flexible Protein Structure With AlphaFold2 and Crosslinking Mass Spectrometry. Mol Cell Proteomics 23, (2024). · DOI
  26. Combe, C. W. , Graham, M. , Kolbowski, L. , Fischer, L. & Rappsilber, J . xiVIEW: Visualisation of Crosslinking Mass Spectrometry Data. J Mol Biol 436, (2024). · DOI
  27. 10.1002/PRO.3902 · DOI
  28. 10.1021/acs.jproteome.0c00957 · DOI
  29. 10.1038/s44319-024-00076-y · DOI
  30. 10.1038/s41594-023-01201-6 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Shenoy, S. V., Biswas, D., Mandal, K., Zalevsky, A., Kishishita, A., Verma, A., Upadhay, I., He, Y., Sali, A., Viner, R., Srivastava, S., & Wiita, A. P.
Affiliations
  • Indian Institute of Technology Bombay (IN)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Thermo Fisher Scientific (United States) (US)
  • Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California San Francisco, CA, USA
Corresponding author
  • Mandal, Kamal
  • Srivastava, Sanjeeva
  • Wiita, Arun P.
Venue
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2025-01-24
Volume
24
Issue
10
Pages
101057-101057
ISSN
1535-9476 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4413324451
Cited by
5
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5
FWCI
1.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular & Cellular Proteomics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Indian Institute of Technology Bombay (BT/PR13114/INF/22/206/2015)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Cancer Institute (R21 CA263299, R01CA290875)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
cross-linking mass spectrometry, AlphaFold structures, protein structure validation, proteome-wide analysis, native protein conformation
MeSH terms
Cross-Linking Reagents, Humans, Peptides, Protein Conformation, Software, Mass Spectrometry, Proteome, Proteomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review