PreprintCited by 5Microbial Metabolic Engineering and BioproductionGene Regulatory Network Analysisthermodynamics and calorimetric analyses

Thermodynamics shape the in vivo enzyme burden of glycolytic pathways

Open access
Khana, Daven B., Jen, Annie, Shishkova, Evgenia, Thusoo, Eashant, Williams, Jonathan, Henkel, Alex, Stevenson, David M., Coon, Joshua J. +1 more·2025·mBio

Abstract

Thermodynamically constrained reactions and pathways are hypothesized to impose greater protein demands on cells, requiring higher enzyme amounts to sustain a given flux compared to those with stronger thermodynamics. To test this, we quantified the absolute concentrations of glycolytic enzymes in three bacterial species — Zymomonas mobilis , Escherichia coli , and Clostridium thermocellum — which employ distinct glycolytic pathways with varying thermodynamic driving forces. By integrating enzyme concentration data with corresponding in vivo metabolic fluxes and ΔG measurements, we found that the highly favorable Entner-Doudoroff (ED) pathway in Z. mobilis requires only one-fourth the amount of enzymatic protein to sustain the same flux as the thermodynamically constrained pyrophosphate-dependent glycolytic pathway in C. thermocellum , with the Embden-Meyerhof-Parnas (EMP) pathway in E. coli exhibiting intermediate thermodynamic favorability and enzyme demand. Across all three pathways, early reactions with stronger thermodynamic driving forces generally required lower enzyme investment than later, less favorable steps. Additionally, reflecting differences in glycolytic strategies, the highly reversible ethanol fermentation pathway in C. thermocellum requires 10-fold more protein to maintain the same flux as the irreversible, forward-driven ethanol fermentation pathway in Z. mobilis . Thus, thermodynamic driving forces constitute a major in vivo determinant of the enzyme burden in metabolic pathways.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2025.01.31.635972

Cites

129 of 129 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [110]Heinonen J. K. & Drake H. L. Comparative assessment of inorganic pyrophosphate and pyrophosphatase levels of Escherichia coli, Clostridium pasteurianum, and Clostridium thermoaceDcum. FEMS Microbiology Letters 52, 205– 208 (1988).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Khana, D. B., Jen, A., Shishkova, E., Thusoo, E., Williams, J., Henkel, A., Stevenson, D. M., Coon, J. J., & Amador-Noguez, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • Oak Ridge National Laboratory (US)
Venue
mBio
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2025-02-06
Volume
16
Issue
10
Pages
e0183725-e0183725
ISSN
2150-7511 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4414242478
Cited by
5
References
129
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2
FWCI
1.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • mBio (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Energy (DESC0018998, ERKP886, DESC0018409)
  • National Institutes of Health (GM118110)
  • Office of Science (DESC0018409)
  • Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center (DE-SC0018409)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35GM118110, P41GM108538)
  • Biological and Environmental Research (DE‐SC0018409, ERKP 886, SC0018409)
  • Center for Bioenergy Innovation (ERKP886)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › thermodynamics and calorimetric analyses
Keywords
glycolysis, thermodynamic driving force, Entner-Doudoroff pathway, Zymomonas mobilis, Escherichia coli, Clostridium thermocellum, alcoholic fermentation, metabolic flux, enzyme concentration, resource allocation, metabolic engineering

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review