PreprintCited by 17Epigenetics and DNA MethylationPlant Molecular Biology ResearchChromosomal and Genetic Variations

Transcription factors instruct DNA methylation patterns in plant reproductive tissues

Open access
Xu, Guanghui, Chen, Yuhan, Wang, Fuxi, Li, En, Law, Julie A.·2025·Nature Cell Biology

Preprint — published as 10.1038/s41556-025-01808-5

Abstract

DNA methylation is maintained by forming self-reinforcing connections with other repressive chromatin modifications, resulting in stably silenced genes and transposons. However, these mechanisms fail to explain how new methylation patterns are generated. In Arabidopsis, CLASSY3 (CLSY3) targets the RNA-directed DNA methylation (RdDM) machinery to different loci in reproductive tissues, generating distinct epigenomes via unknown mechanism(s). Here, we discovered that several different REPRODUCTIVE MERISTEM (REM) transcription factors are required for methylation at CLSY3 targets specific to male or female reproductive tissues. We designate these factors as REM INSTRUCT METHYLATION (RIMs) and demonstrate that disruption of their DNA binding domains, or the motifs they recognize, blocks RdDM. These findings not only reveal RIMs as the first sex-specific RdDM proteins but also establish a critical role for genetic information in targeting DNA methylation. This novel mode of targeting expands our understanding of how methylation is regulated to include inputs from both genetic and epigenetic information.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2025.02.21.639562

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 50 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xu, G., Chen, Y., Wang, F., Li, E., & Law, J. A.
Affiliations
Salk Institute for Biological Studies (US)
Corresponding author
Law, Julie A.
Venue
Nature Cell Biology
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2025-02-23
Volume
27
Issue
12
Pages
2116-2127
ISSN
1465-7392 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4416458299
Cited by
17
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 4
FWCI
5.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Cell Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (GM112966)
  • National Institute on Aging (P30AG068635)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM112966, R01GM112966)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
Keywords
DNA methylation, transcription factors, RNA-directed DNA methylation, anther, ovule, reproductive tissues, Arabidopsis thaliana, epigenetic regulation, gene silencing, transposon silencing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review