PreprintCited by 6Protein Structure and Dynamicsnanoparticles nucleation surface interactionsFreezing and Crystallization Processes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Inhibition of ice recrystallization with designed twistless helical repeat proteins

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1073/pnas.2514871122 · Paper page

Abstract

Given the repetitive structure of crystalline ice, it’s unsurprising that highly active ice-binding proteins, often with beta-roll structures, also have repeating motifs. Here, we introduce a de novo designed family of ice-binding twistless alpha-helical repeat (iTHR) proteins. Each iTHR protein comprises two planar layers of parallel alpha-helices connected by loops—a structural topology not seen in native ice-binding proteins. The ice-binding helices feature an ordered array of TXXXAXXXAXX motifs, spaced to match the pyramidal {201} and secondary prism plane {110} ice lattice facets, and engineered with a 98.2° turn angle per residue to orient threonines uniformly towards the ice surface. iTHR proteins show high solubility, thermostability, and produce varied ice crystal morphologies depending on their intended target facet. Crucially, iTHRs exhibit ice recrystallization inhibition (IRI) at critical concentrations comparable to those of many native globular ice-binding proteins. Extensive site-specific mutagenesis shows that ice-binding activity in iTHR proteins is robust, remaining largely unaffected by changes in chemical composition. Variation in the repeat number reveals a non-monotonic relationship to IRI activity. X-ray crystal structures of two designs confirm the intended orientation of threonines, uniformly pointing toward the ice surface. The iTHR family provides a versatile platform to systematically investigate the complex structure-activity relationships underlying protein-ice interactions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2025.03.09.642278

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 48

  1. 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060815-014546 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1073/pnas.1524109113 · DOI
  3. 2009, Ice recrystallization kinetics in the presence of synthetic antifreeze glycoprotein analogues using the framework of LSW theory, J. Phys. Chem. B, 113, 2865, 10.1021/jp805726e · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2005.07.007 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.actbio.2022.10.056 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2012.09.004 · DOI
  7. 10.1385/CBB:39:2:133 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 2003, ‘Antifreeze’ glycoproteins from polar fish, European Journal of Biochemistry, 270, 1381, 10.1046/j.1432-1033.2003.03488.x · DOI
  9. 10.1038/nature19946 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Ueda, G. et al. Tailored design of protein nanoparticle scaffolds for multivalent presentation of viral glycoprotein antigens. Elife 9, (2020). · DOI
  11. 10.1038/s41467-021-22276-z · DOI
  12. 10.1038/nature16191 · DOI
  13. 10.1038/s41586-019-1361-6 · DOI
  14. 10.1038/s41467-023-43608-1 · DOI
  15. 10.1101/2024.06.24.600095 · DOI
  16. 10.1038/s41586-024-07188-4 · DOI
  17. 10.1038/375427a0 · DOI
  18. 10.1073/pnas.2220380120 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1021/bi047782j · DOI
  20. 10.1073/pnas.2220380120 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1021/ci000449b · DOI
  22. 10.1098/rstb.2002.1081 · DOI
  23. 10.1063/1.459150 · DOI
  24. 10.1371/journal.pone.0024109 · DOI
  25. 10.1126/science.add2187 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1126/science.abj8754 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1021/cg5003308 · DOI
  28. 10.1021/cg800066g · DOI
  29. 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1482 · DOI
  30. 10.1002/admi.202300001 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/j.jmb.2012.01.032 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.pep.2004.01.019 · DOI
  33. 10.1021/bi0488909 · DOI
  34. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b00300 · DOI
  35. 10.1073/pnas.2212456120 · DOI
  36. 10.15252/embr.202052162 · DOI
  37. 10.1038/s41586-023-06415-8 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1126/science.1257481 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1073/pnas.1710695114 · DOI
  40. 10.1016/j.pep.2005.01.016 · DOI
  41. 10.1107/S0907444909047337 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1107/S0907444910045749 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1107/S0021889807021206 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1107/S0907444909052925 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1107/S0907444904019158 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1002/pro.3330 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq007 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
de Haas, R. J., Pyles, H., Huddy, T. F., van Ossenbruggen, J., Zheng, C., van den Broek, D., Carr, A., Bera, A. K., Kang, A., Brackenbrough, E., Joyce, E., Sankaran, B., Baker, D., Voets, I. K., & de Vries, R.
Affiliations
  • Wageningen University & Research (NL)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
  • de Haas, Robbert J.
  • Pyles, Harley
  • Huddy, Timothy F.
  • Voets, Ilja K.
  • de Vries, Renko
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2025-03-13
Volume
122
Issue
48
Pages
e2514871122-e2514871122
ISSN
0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4416664111
Cited by
6
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2
FWCI
1.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • TU/e Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (INV-010680)
  • Open Philanthropy Project
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (NWO-VICI: 232.106)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (P30GM124169)
  • Audacious Project
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Filtration and Separation › Freezing and Crystallization Processes
Keywords
ice recrystallization inhibition, antifreeze proteins, de novo protein design, protein-ice interaction, protein thermal stability, structure-activity relationship
MeSH terms
Protein Conformation, alpha-Helical, Crystallization, Ice, Models, Molecular, Protein Binding, Crystallography, X-Ray, Antifreeze Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review