PreprintCited by 4Advanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsMass Spectrometry Techniques and ApplicationsMachine Learning in Bioinformatics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pairwise Attention: Leveraging Mass Differences to Enhance De Novo Sequencing of Mass Spectra

Open access
Lapin, Joel, Nilsson, Alfred, Wilhelm, Mathias, Käll, Lukas·2025·Journal of Proteome Research

Preprint — published as 10.1021/acs.jproteome.5c00063 · Paper page

Abstract

A fundamental challenge in mass spectrometry-based proteomics is determining which peptide generated a given MS2 spectrum. Peptide sequencing typically relies on matching spectra against a known sequence database, which in some applications is not available. Deep learning-based de novo sequencing can address this limitation by directly predicting peptide sequences from MS2 data. We have seen the application of the transformer architecture to de novo sequencing produce state-of-the-art results on the so-called nine-species benchmark. In this study, we propose an improved transformer encoder inspired by the heuristics used in the manual interpretation of spectra. We modify the attention mechanism with a learned bias based on pairwise mass differences, termed Pairwise Attention (PA). Adding PA improves average peptide precision at 100% coverage by 12.7% (5.9 percentage points) over our base transformer on the original nine-species benchmark. We have also achieved a 7.4% increase over the previously published model Casanovo. Our MS2 encoding strategy is largely orthogonal to other transformer-based models encoding MS2 spectra, enabling straightforward integration into existing deep-learning approaches. Our results show that integrating domain-specific knowledge into transformers boosts de novo sequencing performance.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2025.03.28.645943

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. 10.1038/nature19949 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1038/nbt.1511 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 1999, Probability-based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data, 20, 3551
  4. 10.1021/pr500202e · DOI
  5. 10.1038/ncomms6277 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1038/s42256-021-00304-3 · DOI
  7. 10.1038/s41467-024-49731-x · DOI
  8. 10.1093/bib/bbae021 · DOI
  9. 10.1073/pnas.1705691114 · DOI
  10. 10.1007/s13361-015-1204-0 · DOI
  11. Douwe Schulte , Marta Šiborová , Lukas Käll , and Joost Snijder . Simultaneous polyclonal antibody sequencing and epitope mapping by cryo electron microscopy and mass spectrometry – a perspective. eLife, January 2025. · DOI
  12. Sarah C. Jenson , Fanny Chu , Anthony S. Barente , Dustin L. Crockett , Natalie C. Lamar , Eric D. Merkley , and Kristin H. Jarman . MARLOWE: Taxonomic Characterization of Unknown Samples for Forensics Using De Novo Peptide Identification, September 2024. · DOI
  13. Ashish Vaswani , Noam Shazeer , Niki Parmar , Jakob Uszkoreit , Llion Jones , Aidan N Gomez , L ukasz Kaiser , and Illia Polosukhin . Attention is all you need. In I. Guyon , U. Von Luxburg , S. Bengio , H. Wallach , R. Fergus , S. Vishwanathan , and R. Garnett , editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 30. Curran Associates, Inc., 2017.
  14. Wout Bittremieux , Varun Ananth , William E. Fondrie , Carlo Melendez , Marina Pominova , Justin Sanders , Bo Wen , Melih Yilmaz , and William S. Noble . Deep learning methods for de novo peptide sequencing. Mass Spectrometry Reviews, Nov 2024. · DOI
  15. 2002, De Novo Peptide Sequencing via Manual Interpretation of MS/MS Spectra, Current Protocols in Protein Science, 27, 16.11.1
  16. Ragav Venkatesan and Baoxin Li . Convolutional Neural Networks in Visual Computing: A Concise Guide. CRC Press, Inc., 2017. · DOI
  17. Siddharth Srivastava and Gaurav Sharma . OmniVec: Learning robust representations with cross modal sharing. In 2024 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), pages 1225–1237, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, January 2024. IEEE Computer Society. · DOI
  18. Xuan Shen , Yaohua Wang , Ming Lin , Yilun Huang , Hao Tang , Xiuyu Sun , and Yanzhi Wang . DeepMAD: Mathematical Architecture Design for Deep Convolutional Neural Network. In 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 6163–6173, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, June 2023. IEEE Computer Society. · DOI
  19. Yanghao Li , Yuntao Chen , Naiyan Wang , and Zhao-Xiang Zhang . Scale-Aware Trident Networks for Object Detection. In 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), pages 6053–6062, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, November 2019. IEEE Computer Society. · DOI
  20. Wenhai Wang , Jifeng Dai , Zhe Chen , Zhenhang Huang , Zhiqi Li , Xizhou Zhu , Xiaowei Hu , Tong Lu , Lewei Lu , Hongsheng Li , Xiaogang Wang , and Yu Qiao . Internimage: Exploring large-scale vision foundation models with deformable convolutions. In 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 14408–14419, 2023. · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1016/j.cels.2018.08.004 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1021/acs.jproteome.2c00334 · DOI
  23. 10.1073/pnas.1705691114 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Lapin, J., Nilsson, A., Wilhelm, M., & Käll, L.
Affiliations
  • Technical University of Munich (DE)
  • Science for Life Laboratory (SE)
Corresponding author
  • Wilhelm, Mathias
  • Käll, Lukas
Venue
Journal of Proteome Research
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2025-04-03
Volume
24
Issue
7
Pages
3722-3730
ISSN
1535-3893 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4410966262
Cited by
4
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4
FWCI
1.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Proteome Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • mediaTUM (Technical University of Munich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • European Commission (101077037)
  • Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse (KAW 2022.0032, 2022.0032, KAW 2022)
  • Vetenskapsrådet (2024-05887)
  • National Supercomputer Centre, Linköpings Universitet
  • H2020 European Research Council (101077037)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
Keywords
de novo peptide sequencing, MS2 spectra, mass difference, Transformer encoder, spectral interpretation
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Algorithms, Peptides, Mass Spectrometry, Sequence Analysis, Protein, Databases, Protein, Proteomics, Tandem Mass Spectrometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review