PreprintCited by 14Machine Learning in BioinformaticsProtein Structure and Dynamicsvaccines and immunoinformatics approaches

Fine-Tuning Protein Language Models Unlocks the Potential of Underrepresented Viral Proteomes

Open access
Sawhney, Rajan, Ferrell, Barbra, Dejean, Thibaut, Schreiber, Zachary, Harrigan, William, Polson, Shawn W., Wommack, K. Eric, Belcaid, Mahdi·2025·PeerJ

Preprint — published as 10.7717/peerj.19919 · Paper page

Abstract

Protein language models (pLMs) have revolutionized computational biology by generating rich protein vector representations—or embeddings—enabling major advancements in de novo protein design, structure prediction, variant effect analysis, and evolutionary studies. Despite these breakthroughs, current pLMs often exhibit biases against proteins from underrepresented species, with viral proteins being particularly affected—frequently referred to as the “dark matter” of the biological world due to their vast diversity and ubiquity, yet sparse representation in training datasets. Here, we show that fine-tuning pre-trained pLMs on viral protein sequences, using diverse learning frameworks and parameter-efficient strategies, significantly enhances representation quality and improves performance on downstream tasks. To support further research, we provide source code for fine-tuning pLMs and benchmarking embedding quality. By enabling more accurate modeling of viral proteins, our approach advances tools for understanding viral biology, combating emerging infectious diseases, and driving biotechnological innovation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2025.04.17.649224

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Sawhney, R., Ferrell, B., Dejean, T., Schreiber, Z., Harrigan, W., Polson, S. W., Wommack, K. E., & Belcaid, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
  • Delaware Biotechnology Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Belcaid, Mahdi
Venue
PeerJ
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2025-04-23
Volume
13
Pages
e19919-e19919
ISSN
2167-8359 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4414337601
Cited by
14
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 4
FWCI
4.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PeerJ (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1736030, 2025567)
  • NIH (P20GM103446, S10OD028725)
  • Delaware Biotechnology Institute, and the State of Delaware
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
Keywords
protein language models, fine-tuning, viral proteins, protein embeddings, parameter-efficient learning, protein sequence modeling, emerging infectious diseases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review