The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
SPAED: Harnessing AlphaFold Output for Accurate Segmentation of Phage Endolysin Domains
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaf531 · Paper page
Abstract
Summary: SPAED is an accessible tool for the accurate segmentation of protein domains that applies hierarchical clustering to the predicted aligned error (PAE) matrix obtained from AlphaFold predictions. It leverages information contained in the PAE matrix to better identify domain-linker boundaries and detect disordered regions. On a dataset of 376 bacteriophage endolysins (proteins that degrade the bacterial cell wall), SPAED achieves a mean intersect-over-union score of 96% and a domain-boundary-distance score of 89% compared to 94% and 70%, respectively, for the state-of-the-art tool Chainsaw. Availability and Implementation: SPAED is available on the web at http://spaed.ca and available for download at https://github.com/Rousseau-Team/spaed . Contact: Elsa Rousseau - elsa.rousseau@ift.ulaval.ca , Roberto Vázquez - rvazqf@gmail.com
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 35
- 10.1038/s41579-019-0311-5 · DOI
- 10.1038/nrmicro2315 · DOI
- 10.1016/bs.aivir.2018.09.003 · DOI
- 10.1128/JVI.03277-12 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001740 · DOI
- Vázquez, R. , García, E. & García, P. Sequence-Function Relationships in Phage-Encoded Bacterial Cell Wall Lytic Enzymes and Their Implications for Phage-Derived Product Design. Journal of Virology 95, e00321–21. · DOI
- 10.3390/v13071240 · DOI
- 10.2217/fmb.12.97 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-023-43236-9 · DOI
- 10.1126/sciadv.aaz1136 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2017.12.009 · DOI
- 10.1038/S41586-024-07487-W · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btae296 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz650 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-023-43934-4 · DOI · Paper page
- Lee, J. , Hunter, B. & Shim, H. A pangenome analysis of ESKAPE bacteriophages: the underrepresentation may impact machine learning models. Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences 11, (2024). · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.csbj.2021.01.041 · DOI
- 10.1002/pro.4548 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030232 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41598-022-14382-9 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/prot.25415 · DOI
- 10.1007/s12602-024-10309-0 · DOI
- 10.1101/2025.02.06.636829 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41592-022-01488-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/elps.1150181505 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1207382109 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00253-023-12839-z · DOI
- 10.1128/JB.182.20.5823-5831.2000 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41586-023-06415-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btad070 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkac370 · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.20736 · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.21675 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1905068116 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00253-022-12072-0 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Boulay, A., Cremelie, E., Galiez, C., Briers, Y., Rousseau, E., & Vázquez, R.
- Affiliations
- Ghent University (BE)
- Institut polytechnique de Grenoble (FR)
- Université Laval (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Rousseau, Elsa
- Vázquez, Roberto
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2025-04-28
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 10
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC12518921
- OpenAlex
- W4414458008
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4
- FWCI
- 1.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nd)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases
- Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (1S15424N)
- Universiteit Gent (01P10022)
- Mitacs
- Vlaamse regering
- Alliance de recherche numérique du Canada
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
- Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé (307935, Junior 1)
- Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies (325947)
- Compute Ontario
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Virology › Bacteriophages and microbial interactions
- Keywords
- endolysin, AlphaFold, intrinsically disordered regions, protein structure prediction
- MeSH terms
- Protein Domains, Bacteriophages, Endopeptidases, Software, Viral Proteins, Computational Biology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review