PreprintCited by 0Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy TechniquesBiochemical and Structural Characterizationbioluminescence and chemiluminescence research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Intensity Modulation of Trichromatic Split Fluorescent Proteins for Live Cell Mapping

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1016/j.crmeth.2026.101363

Abstract

Multiplexed live cell-labeling technologies are essential tools for investigating complex biological systems, yet existing approaches face limitations in achieving reliable discrimination of multiple cell populations. Here, we present color and intensity modulation with split fluorescent proteins for cell labeling (Caterpie), a live cell labeling system that enables high-fidelity identification of multiple cell populations through rational design of split fluorescent proteins. Drawing inspiration from human trichromatic vision, we engineered optimized split fluorescent protein variants—split CFP2, split mNG3A, and split sfCherry3C—and developed a comprehensive library of the 11th β-strand (FP 11 ) tags comprising variable numbers of tandem repeats. Structure-guided protein engineering enhanced the performance of split mNG3A and split sfCherry3C through targeted modifications of their C-terminal sequences and binding interfaces, respectively. By systematically varying the composition and arrangement of FP 11 repeats, we selected 20 distinct FP 11 tags that enable robust cell population discrimination with 97% accuracy using conventional fluorescence microscopy. In these FP 11 tag-expressing cells, we expressed multiple EGF ligands and their receptors and cultured them in bulk to examine the effects of EGF signaling on chemotaxis within the cell population. The results showed that chemotaxis changes according to the intensity of EGFR signaling. The Caterpie system holds significant potential for applications requiring precise identification and tracking of multiple cell populations in complex biological systems.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2025.05.13.653616

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. 10.1038/nature06293 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.10.124 · DOI
  3. 10.1038/nbt1044 · DOI
  4. 10.1073/pnas.1606731113 · DOI
  5. 10.1126/science.abi6983 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1038/ncomms11046 · DOI
  7. 10.1534/genetics.119.302063 · DOI
  8. 10.1093/genetics/iyab014 · DOI
  9. 10.1073/pnas.2024690118 · DOI
  10. 2021, Multiplexed labeling of cellular proteins with split fluorescent protein tags. Commun, Biol, 4, 257
  11. 10.1371/journal.pone.0242592 · DOI
  12. 2019, Bright split red fluorescent proteins for the visualization of endogenous proteins and synapses. Commun, Biol, 2, 344
  13. 10.1038/s41596-024-01060-5 · DOI
  14. 10.1101/2021.10.04.463034 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1016/B978-0-12-381270-4.00019-6 · DOI
  16. 10.1002/pro.4428 · DOI
  17. 10.1023/A:1011258906244 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.pep.2008.07.010 · DOI
  19. 10.1038/srep18329 · DOI
  20. 10.1038/s41592-020-01018-x · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114986 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.cell.2010.09.016 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1016/j.cub.2012.10.054 · DOI
  24. 10.1084/jem.20130403 · DOI
  25. 10.1038/nmeth.2450 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.12.016 · DOI
  27. 10.1038/mt.2008.6 · DOI
  28. 10.1093/cercor/bhs134 · DOI
  29. 10.1242/dev.105254 · DOI
  30. 10.7554/eLife.40350 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/j.neuron.2020.05.038 · DOI
  32. 10.1038/s41467-017-00494-8 · DOI
  33. 2020, An improved platform for functional assessment of large protein libraries in mammalian cells, Nucleic Acids Res, 48, e1
  34. 10.1038/s41598-018-23625-7 · DOI
  35. 10.1038/nmeth.2521 · DOI
  36. 10.1073/pnas.1834876100 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.devcel.2004.06.005 · DOI
  38. 10.1038/s41598-018-27174-x · DOI
  39. 10.1371/journal.pone.0018556 · DOI
  40. 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90457-4 · DOI
  41. 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90436-0 · DOI
  42. 10.1038/nmeth.1323 · DOI
  43. 10.1038/nmeth.2089 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1128/JVI.72.10.8150-8157.1998 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1289/EHP4713 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Ishii, M., Kinjo, T., Kondo, Y., Terai, K., Aoki, K., Kuhlman, B., & Matsuda, M.
Affiliations
  • Kyoto University (JP)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Nagoya University (JP)
  • Tokushima University (JP)
Corresponding author
  • Ishii, Mamoru
  • Matsuda, Michiyuki
Venue
Cell Reports Methods
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2025-05-14
Volume
6
Issue
4
Pages
101363-101363
ISSN
2667-2375 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4410430249
Cited by
0
References
1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell Reports Methods (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Takeda Science Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35GM131923)
  • Moonshot Research and Development Program
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biochemical and Structural Characterization
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › bioluminescence and chemiluminescence research
Keywords
split fluorescent proteins, live cell labeling, intensity modulation, structure-guided protein engineering, EGF signaling, EGFR, cell chemotaxis
MeSH terms
Humans, Luminescent Proteins, Microscopy, Fluorescence, Green Fluorescent Proteins, HEK293 Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review