Cited by 4,369Cell Image Analysis TechniquesAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsMedical Image Segmentation Techniques

Cellpose: a generalist algorithm for cellular segmentation

Open access
Stringer, Carsen, Wang, Tim, Michaelos, Michalis, Pachitariu, Marius·2021·Nature Methods

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Many biological applications require the segmentation of cell bodies, membranes and nuclei from microscopy images. Deep learning has enabled great progress on this problem, but current methods are specialized for images that have large training datasets. Here we introduce a generalist, deep learning-based segmentation method called Cellpose, which can precisely segment cells from a wide range of image types and does not require model retraining or parameter adjustments. Cellpose was trained on a new dataset of highly varied images of cells, containing over 70,000 segmented objects. We also demonstrate a three-dimensional (3D) extension of Cellpose that reuses the two-dimensional (2D) model and does not require 3D-labeled data. To support community contributions to the training data, we developed software for manual labeling and for curation of the automated results. Periodically retraining the model on the community-contributed data will ensure that Cellpose improves constantly.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41592-020-01018-x

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Cellpose default model ('cyto') was trained on 540 images of cells and objects with one or two channels (if the image had a nuclear channel).

    “The Cellpose default model (‘cyto’) was trained on 540 images of cells and objects with one or two channels (if the image had a nuclear channel).”

    From Cellpose 2.0: how to train your own model (2022) · cites this paper as [5]

  • Cellpose machine learning was unable to segment the full cell including its processes.

    “we found that state-of-the-art Cellpose machine learning β was unable to segment the full cell including its processes (Stringer et al, 2021).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stringer, C., Wang, T., Michaelos, M., & Pachitariu, M.
Affiliations
Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Pachitariu, Marius
Venue
Nature Methods
Published
2020-12-14
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
100-106
ISSN
  • 1548-7091 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-7105
OpenAlex
W3111521801
Cited by
4,369
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 1095 · 2025: 1208 · 2024: 906 · 2023: 597 · 2022: 353 · 2021: 179 · 2020: 28 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
138.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Methods (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Howard Hughes Medical Institute (Janelia)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Cell Image Analysis Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
Keywords
Cellpose, cell segmentation, nuclei segmentation, cell membrane segmentation, microscopy image analysis, 3D segmentation, transfer learning
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Algorithms, Animals, Cell Nucleus, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Neurons, Software, Neural Networks, Computer, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review