The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Boosting AlphaFold Protein Tertiary Structure Prediction through MSA Engineering and Extensive Model Sampling and Ranking in CASP16
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1038/s42003-025-08960-6 · Paper page
Abstract
AlphaFold2 and AlphaFold3 have revolutionized protein structure prediction by enabling high-accuracy tertiary structure predictions for most single-chain proteins. However, obtaining high-quality predictions for some hard protein targets with shallow or noisy multiple sequence alignments (MSAs) and complicated multi-domain architectures remains challenging. Here, we present MULTICOM4, an integrative protein structure prediction system that uses diverse MSA generation, large-scale model sampling, and an ensemble model quality assessment (QA) strategy of combining individual QA methods to improve model generation and ranking of AlphaFold2 and AlphaFold3. In the 16th Critical Assessment of Techniques for Protein Structure Prediction (CASP16), our predictors built on MULTICOM4 ranked among the top performers out of 120 predictors in tertiary structure prediction and outperformed a standard AlphaFold3 predictor. The average TM-score of our best performing predictor MULTCOM’s top-1 prediction for 84 CASP16 domain is 0.902. It achieved high accuracy (TM-score > 0.9) for 73.8% of the 84 domains and correct fold predictions (TM-score > 0.5) for 97.6% domains in terms of top-1 prediction. In terms of best-of-top-5 prediction, it predicted correct folds for all the domains. The results show that MSA engineering through the use of different protein sequence databases, alignment tools, and domain segmentation as well as extensive model sampling are the key to generate accurate and correct structural models. Additionally, using multiple complementary QA methods and model clustering can improve the robustness and reliability of model ranking.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 31
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts598 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx780 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx781 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1821309116 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41586-019-1923-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.abj8754 · DOI · Paper page
- Lin, Z. et al. Language models of protein sequences at the scale of evolution enable accurate structure prediction. bioRxiv (2022).
- Vaswani, A. et al. Attention is all you need. Advances in neural information processing systems 30 (2017).
- 10.1002/prot.26222 · DOI
- Evans, R. et al. Protein complex prediction with alphafold-multimer. biorxiv 2021–10 (2021).
- 10.48550/ARXIV.2006.11239 · DOI · Paper page
- Eswar, N. , Eramian, D. , Webb, B. Shen, M.-Y. & Sali, A. Protein structure modeling with modeller. Structural proteomics: high-throughput methods 145–159 (2008). · DOI
- 10.1038/s42004-023-00991-6 · DOI · Paper page
- Liu, J. , Neupane, P. & Cheng, J. Estimating protein complex model accuracy using graph transformers and pairwise similarity graphs. bioRxiv 2025–02 (2025). · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s42003-023-05525-3 · DOI · Paper page
- Liu, J. , Neupane, P. & Cheng, J. Improving alphafold2 and 3-based protein complex structure prediction with multicom4 in casp16. Proteins 2025 (2025). · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkw1081 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gky1049 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41592-019-0437-4 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41467-018-04964-5 · DOI · Paper page
- 2020, Mgnify: the microbiome analysis resource in 2020, Nucleic acids research, 48, D570
- 10.1038/nmeth.1818 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1186/1471-2105-11-1 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41592-023-02130-4 · DOI
- 10.1186/s13059-019-1727-y · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.2110828118 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkt1069 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/16.12.1091 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btad070 · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.26186 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu744 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, J., Neupane, P., & Cheng, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Missouri (US)
- Corresponding author
- Cheng, Jianlin
- Venue
- Communications Biology
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2025-06-09
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1587-1587
- ISSN
- 2399-3642 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC12623963
- OpenAlex
- W4416291529
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 3.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Communications Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (R01GM093123, R01GM146340)
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM093123, R01GM146340)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Keywords
- protein tertiary structure prediction, AlphaFold2, AlphaFold3, model ranking, CASP16, multidomain proteins, model clustering, TM-score
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review