PreprintCited by 10Protein Structure and DynamicsEnzyme Structure and FunctionMachine Learning in Bioinformatics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Boosting AlphaFold Protein Tertiary Structure Prediction through MSA Engineering and Extensive Model Sampling and Ranking in CASP16

Open access
Liu, Jian, Neupane, Pawan, Cheng, Jianlin·2025·Communications Biology

Preprint — published as 10.1038/s42003-025-08960-6 · Paper page

Abstract

AlphaFold2 and AlphaFold3 have revolutionized protein structure prediction by enabling high-accuracy tertiary structure predictions for most single-chain proteins. However, obtaining high-quality predictions for some hard protein targets with shallow or noisy multiple sequence alignments (MSAs) and complicated multi-domain architectures remains challenging. Here, we present MULTICOM4, an integrative protein structure prediction system that uses diverse MSA generation, large-scale model sampling, and an ensemble model quality assessment (QA) strategy of combining individual QA methods to improve model generation and ranking of AlphaFold2 and AlphaFold3. In the 16th Critical Assessment of Techniques for Protein Structure Prediction (CASP16), our predictors built on MULTICOM4 ranked among the top performers out of 120 predictors in tertiary structure prediction and outperformed a standard AlphaFold3 predictor. The average TM-score of our best performing predictor MULTCOM’s top-1 prediction for 84 CASP16 domain is 0.902. It achieved high accuracy (TM-score > 0.9) for 73.8% of the 84 domains and correct fold predictions (TM-score > 0.5) for 97.6% domains in terms of top-1 prediction. In terms of best-of-top-5 prediction, it predicted correct folds for all the domains. The results show that MSA engineering through the use of different protein sequence databases, alignment tools, and domain segmentation as well as extensive model sampling are the key to generate accurate and correct structural models. Additionally, using multiple complementary QA methods and model clustering can improve the robustness and reliability of model ranking.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2025.06.06.658338

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts598 · DOI
  2. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx780 · DOI
  3. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx781 · DOI
  4. 10.1073/pnas.1821309116 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1038/s41586-019-1923-7 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1126/science.abj8754 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Lin, Z. et al. Language models of protein sequences at the scale of evolution enable accurate structure prediction. bioRxiv (2022).
  8. Vaswani, A. et al. Attention is all you need. Advances in neural information processing systems 30 (2017).
  9. 10.1002/prot.26222 · DOI
  10. Evans, R. et al. Protein complex prediction with alphafold-multimer. biorxiv 2021–10 (2021).
  11. 10.48550/ARXIV.2006.11239 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Eswar, N. , Eramian, D. , Webb, B. Shen, M.-Y. & Sali, A. Protein structure modeling with modeller. Structural proteomics: high-throughput methods 145–159 (2008). · DOI
  13. 10.1038/s42004-023-00991-6 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Liu, J. , Neupane, P. & Cheng, J. Estimating protein complex model accuracy using graph transformers and pairwise similarity graphs. bioRxiv 2025–02 (2025). · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1038/s42003-023-05525-3 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Liu, J. , Neupane, P. & Cheng, J. Improving alphafold2 and 3-based protein complex structure prediction with multicom4 in casp16. Proteins 2025 (2025). · DOI
  17. 10.1093/nar/gkw1081 · DOI
  18. 10.1093/nar/gky1049 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1038/s41592-019-0437-4 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1038/s41467-018-04964-5 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 2020, Mgnify: the microbiome analysis resource in 2020, Nucleic acids research, 48, D570
  22. 10.1038/nmeth.1818 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1186/1471-2105-11-1 · DOI
  24. 10.1038/s41592-023-02130-4 · DOI
  25. 10.1186/s13059-019-1727-y · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1073/pnas.2110828118 · DOI
  27. 10.1093/nar/gkt1069 · DOI
  28. 10.1093/bioinformatics/16.12.1091 · DOI
  29. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btad070 · DOI
  30. 10.1002/prot.26186 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu744 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Liu, J., Neupane, P., & Cheng, J.
Affiliations
University of Missouri (US)
Corresponding author
Cheng, Jianlin
Venue
Communications Biology
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2025-06-09
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
1587-1587
ISSN
2399-3642 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4416291529
Cited by
10
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 1
FWCI
3.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Communications Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (R01GM093123, R01GM146340)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM093123, R01GM146340)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
Keywords
protein tertiary structure prediction, AlphaFold2, AlphaFold3, model ranking, CASP16, multidomain proteins, model clustering, TM-score

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review