Single Cell Proteomics in the Developing Human Brain
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1038/s41587-025-02980-7 · Paper page
Abstract
Proteins are the functional effectors of virtually all biological processes, and accurately measuring their abundance and dynamics is essential for understanding development and disease. Although mRNA levels have historically been used as proxies for protein expression, growing evidence, especially from studies of the human cerebral cortex, has revealed widespread discordance between transcript and protein abundance. To directly address this limitation, we developed a rigorously optimized workflow that combines single-cell mass spectrometry with precise sample preparation to resolve, for the first time, quantitative proteomes of individual cells from the developing human brain. Our platform achieved deep proteomic coverage (∼800 proteins per cell) even in immature prenatal human neurons (5–10 μm diameter, ∼100 pg of protein per cell), capturing major brain cell types and enabling proteome-wide characterization at single-cell resolution. This approach revealed extensive transcriptome–proteome discordance across cell types, with particularly strong discrepancies in genes associated with neurodevelopmental disorders, a finding validated through orthogonal experiments. Proteins exhibited markedly higher cell-type specificity than their mRNA counterparts, underscoring the importance of proteomic-level analysis for resolving cellular identity and function. By reconstructing developmental trajectories from radial glia to excitatory neurons at the proteomic level, we identified dynamic stage-specific protein co-expression modules and pinpointed the intermediate progenitor-to-neuron transition as a molecularly vulnerable phase linked to autism. Altogether, by enabling single cell proteomics, this study establishes a foundational resource and technological advance for developmental neuroscience. It demonstrates that single-cell proteomics can capture critical developmental events and disease mechanisms that are undetectable at the transcript level. As this technology continues to improve in sensitivity and scalability, single-cell proteomics will become an indispensable tool for uncovering the molecular logic of brain development and for illuminating pathophysiological processes underlying neurodevelopmental disorders.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Global quantification of mammalian gene expression control
Schwanhäusser, B., Busse, D., Li, N., Dittmar, G., Schuchhardt, J., Wolf, J., Chen, W., & Selbach, M. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10098 · Cited by 6,566 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…be explained by the differing turnover rates of the transcript and protein: KI67 has a short protein half-life (~1–1.5 hours) 33,34 compared to a much longer mRNA half-life (~5 hours) 35,36 , which would explain the strong MKI67 mRNA expression but much attenuated protein abundance in RG ( Fig.”
InfluentialSFARI Gene 2.0: a community-driven knowledgebase for the autism spectrum disorders (ASDs)
Abrahams, B. S., Arking, D. E., Campbell, D. B., Mefford, H. C., Morrow, E. M., Weiss, L. A., Menashe, I., Wadkins, T., Banerjee-Basu, S., & Packer, A. (2013) · Molecular Autism · doi:10.1186/2040-2392-4-36 · Cited by 873 · see citing works
Cell type- and brain region-resolved mouse brain proteome
Sharma, K., Schmitt, S., Bergner, C. G., Tyanova, S., Kannaiyan, N., Manrique-Hoyos, N., Kongi, K., Cantuti, L., Hanisch, U.-K., Philips, M.-A., et al. (2015) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4160 · Cited by 871 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Wu, T., Jiang, L., Mukhtar, T., Wang, L., Jian, R., Wang, C., Trinh, T., Kriegstein, A. R., Snyder, M., & Li, J.
- Affiliations
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- Stanford Medicine (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kriegstein, Arnold R.
- Snyder, Michael
- Li, Jingjing
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Biotechnology
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2025-06-24
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1391-1404
- ISSN
- 0733-222X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W7125786661
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 2
- FWCI
- 31.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- single-cell proteomics, human brain development, label-free mass spectrometry, neurodevelopmental disorders, autism spectrum disorder, radial glia, excitatory neurons, developmental trajectories, cell type specificity
- MeSH terms
- Single-Cell Gene Expression Analysis, Neurodevelopment, Brain, Humans, Neurons, Proteome, Proteomics, Single-Cell Analysis, Transcriptome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review