The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Accurate and efficient phylogenetic inference through end-to-end deep learning
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1093/molbev/msaf260 · Paper page
Abstract
Accurate phylogenetic inference is crucial for understanding evolutionary relationships among species. Deep learning technique has been introduced for phylogenetic inference; however, the existing deep learning-based approaches either suffer from limited accuracy as they split inference into several disjoint stages, or exhibit low efficiency and hardly apply to the cases with over 20 species. Here we present an accurate and efficient approach to phylogenetic inference. Our approach, called NeuralNJ, employs an end-to-end framework that directly constructs phylogenetic trees from the input taxa, thus effectively avoiding the inaccuracy incurred by the split inference stages. The key innovation of NeuralNJ lies in its learnable neighbor joining mechanism, which iteratively joins neighbors guided by learned priority scores and thereby achieves accurate tree reconstruction. The inference accuracy is further enhanced through incorporating reinforcement learning-based tree search. Using both simulated and empirical data as representatives, we demonstrate that NeuralNJ can effectively infer phylogenetic tree with improved computational efficiency and reconstruction accuracy. The study paves the way to accurate and efficient phylogenetic inference for hundreds of taxa in complex evolutionary scenarios.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 58
- 2015, Trends in substitution models of molecular evolution, Frontiers in Genetics, 6, 319
- 2021, Harnessing machine learning to guide phylogenetic-tree search algorithms, Nature Communications, 12, 1983, 10.1038/s41467-021-22073-8 · DOI
- 10.1093/molbev/msae105 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00026-004-0229-z · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003537 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1006/tpbi.2000.1485 · DOI
- 10.1145/1102351.1102363 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti1027 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp163 · DOI · Paper page
- R. Desper and O. Gascuel . Fast and Accurate Phylogeny Reconstruction Algorithms Based on the Minimum-Evolution Principle. In R. Guigó and D. Gusfield , editors, Algorithms in Bioinformatics, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2002. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. ISBN 978-3-540-45784-8.
- 10.1093/sysbio/19.1.83 · DOI
- 10.2307/2412810 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF01734359 · DOI · Paper page
- J. Felsenstein . Inferring phylogenies. In Inferring phylogenies, pages 664–664. 2004.
- 10.1126/science.155.3760.279 · DOI
- 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025808 · DOI
- 10.1111/mec.15631 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.patcog.2017.10.013 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/sysbio/syq010 · DOI · Paper page
- 2019, Axial Attention in Multidimensional Transformers, arXiv preprint
- 10.1126/science.abk3112 · DOI · Paper page
- 1969, Evolution of protein molecules, Mammalian Protein Metabolism, 3, 21
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz305 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41586-021-04188-6 · DOI
- 10.1093/molbev/msac092 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btad540 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.abg0821 · DOI
- 10.1093/molbev/msaa015 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/molbev/msaa314 · DOI
- S. Naser-Khdour , B. Q. Minh , and R. Lanfear . The influence of model violation on phylogenetic inference: a simulation study. bioRxiv, pages 2021–09, 2021. · DOI
- 10.1093/molbev/msaf051 · DOI
- 10.1093/molbev/msu300 · DOI · Paper page
- 2022, Divergent SARS-CoV-2 variant emerges in white-tailed deer with deer-to-human transmission, Nature Microbiology, 7, 2011, 10.1038/s41564-022-01268-9 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0013124 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF02338839 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.genom.9.081307.164407 · DOI
- 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003881 · DOI
- R. M. Rao , J. Liu , R. Verkuil , J. Meier , J. Canny , P. Abbeel , T. Sercu , and A. Rives . MSA Transformer. In M. Meila and T. Zhang , editors, Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Machine Learning, volume 139 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Re-search, pages 8844–8856. PMLR, 18–24 Jul 2021. URL https://proceedings.mlr.press/v139/rao21a.html.
- 10.1016/0025-5564(81)90043-2 · DOI
- 10.1093/sysbio/sys029 · DOI
- 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454 · DOI
- 10.1109/78.650093 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/bib/bbaa154 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btad543 · DOI
- 1958, A statistical method for evaluating systematic relationships, University of Kansas science bulletin, 38, 1409
- 10.1093/sysbio/syr029 · DOI
- 10.1093/sysbio/sys042 · DOI
- D. L. Swofford and J. Sullivan . Phylogeny inference based on parsimony and other methods using PAUP, page 267–312. Cambridge University Press, 2009. · DOI
- 10.1186/1471-2105-13-209 · DOI
- A. Vaswani , N. Shazeer , N. Parmar , J. Uszkoreit , L. Jones , A. N. Gomez , L. u. Kaiser , and I. Polosukhin . Attention is All you Need. 30, 2017. URL https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2017/file/3f5ee243547dee91fbd053c1c4a845aa-Paper.pdf.
- 10.1016/0022-5193(78)90137-6 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00992696 · DOI
- 2023, ARTree: A Deep Autoregressive Model for Phylogenetic Inference, 36, 14427
- 10.1007/BF00160154 · DOI · Paper page
- C. Zhang . Learnable Topological Features For Phylogenetic Inference via Graph Neural Networks. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations, 2023. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=hVVUY7p64WL.
- 2023, PhyloGFN: Phylogenetic inference with generative flow networks, arXiv preprint
- 10.1093/molbev/msx302 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/molbev/msz307 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, X., Ding, S., Yu, C., Zhao, J., & Bu, D.
- Affiliations
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Ding, Shizhe
- Bu, Dongbo
- Venue
- Molecular Biology and Evolution
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2025-10-02
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 11
- ISSN
- 0737-4038 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC12622301
- OpenAlex
- W4415478883
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2
- FWCI
- 0.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Molecular Biology and Evolution (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Key Research and Development Program of China (2024YFC3405500)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (32271297, 82130055)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fractal and DNA sequence analysis
- Keywords
- phylogenetic inference, end-to-end deep learning, computational efficiency
- MeSH terms
- Deep Learning, Phylogeny
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review