The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ConforFold Recovers Alternative Protein Conformations Beyond MSA Subsampling
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1002/pro.70564 · Paper page
Abstract
Conformational changes underlie many aspects of protein function, yet current structure prediction tools remain limited in their ability to systematically sample structural ensembles. Here, we present ConforPSSP and ConforFold , a combined framework that integrates secondary-structure sampling into deep learning-based prediction to recover multiple protein conformational states. ConforPSSP employs a transformer model trained on multi-residue fragments to generate diverse 8-state protein secondary structure predictions (PSSPs), which are then used to condition a retrained OpenFold model (ConforFold). ConforFold achieved state-of-the-art performance in conformer recovery. On our test dataset of protein samples with two alternative conformations, it correctly identified both conformers in 84% of cases at TM-scores≥0.8, outperforming AlphaFlow (75.4%), which uses diffusion-based sampling, and Cfold, which relies on MSA clustering. Combining ConforFold with AlphaFlow further improved recovery rates while retaining the complementary strengths of both approaches. These results establish ConforFold as a broadly applicable framework for modeling structural ensembles. By explicitly integrating secondary structure it recovers conformations inaccessible to MSA-based subsampling or diffusion models, offering a new avenue for investigating conformational heterogeneity, mechanistic transitions, and the structural basis of protein function.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Predicting multiple conformations via sequence clustering and AlphaFold2
Wayment-Steele, H. K., Ojoawo, A., Otten, R., Apitz, J. M., Pitsawong, W., Hömberger, M., Ovchinnikov, S., Colwell, L., & Kern, D. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06832-9 · Cited by 545
Sampling alternative conformational states of transporters and receptors with AlphaFold2
del Alamo, D., Sala, D., Mchaourab, H. S., & Meiler, J. (2022) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.75751 · Cited by 511
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 16
- 10.1021/ar400084s · DOI · Paper page
- 2012, Protein Conformational Switches: From Nature to Design, Chemistry – A European Journal, 18, 7984, 10.1002/chem.201200348 · DOI
- Bertoline, L. M. F. , Lima, A. N. , Krieger, J. E. & Teixeira, S. K. Before and after AlphaFold2: An overview of protein structure prediction. Frontiers in Bioinformatics 3, (2023). · DOI
- 10.1038/S41586-024-07487-W · DOI · Paper page
- 1979, Accurate prediction of protein structures and interactions using a three-track neural network, Science, 373, 871
- 10.1038/s41467-024-46715-9 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.sbi.2023.102645 · DOI · Paper page
- Sala, D. , Hildebrand, P. W. & Meiler, J. Biasing AlphaFold2 to predict GPCRs and kinases with user-defined functional or structural properties. Front Mol Biosci 10, (2023). · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41467-024-51507-2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41592-024-02272-z · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/bip.360221211 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gkq1105 · DOI
- Stein, R. A. & McHaourab, H. S. SPEACH_AF: Sampling protein ensembles and conformational heterogeneity with Alphafold2. PLoS Comput Biol 18, (2022). · DOI · Paper page
- 2019, Molecular Dynamics Study of the Changes in Conformation of Calmodulin with Calcium Binding and/or Target Recognition, Sci Rep, 9, 10688, 10.1038/s41598-019-47063-1 · DOI
- Jing, B. , Berger, B. & Jaakkola, T. AlphaFold Meets Flow Matching for Generating Protein Ensembles. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.04845 (2024). · arXiv
- Ahdritz, G. et al. OpenProteinSet: Training data for structural biology at scale. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.05326 (2023). · arXiv
Metadata
- Authors
- Syrlybaeva, R., & Strauch, E.-M.
- Affiliations
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- Corresponding author
- Strauch, Eva-Maria
- ORCID
- Strauch, Eva-Maria
- Venue
- Protein Science
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2025-10-14
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- e70564-e70564
- ISSN
- 0961-8368 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W7152457382
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2
- FWCI
- 4.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Protein Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- NIH (R01AI180127)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Keywords
- protein conformational ensembles, secondary structure prediction, protein structure prediction, transformer models, conformational heterogeneity, protein folding
- MeSH terms
- Deep Learning, Models, Molecular, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Software, Protein Structure, Secondary, Computational Biology, Molecular Dynamics Simulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review