PreprintCited by 949Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyIntergenerational and Educational Inequality StudiesGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestock

The nature of nurture: effects of parental genotypes

Open access
Kong, Augustine, Thorleifsson, Gudmar, Frigge, Michael L., Vilhjálmsson, Bjarni J., Young, Alexander I., Thorgeirsson, Thorgeir E., Benonisdottir, Stefania, Oddsson, Asmundur +7 more·2017·Science

Preprint — published as 10.1126/science.aan6877 · Paper page

Abstract

Sequence variants in the parental genomes that are not transmitted to a child/proband are often ignored in genetic studies. Here we show that non-transmitted alleles can impact a child through their effects on the parents and other relatives, a phenomenon we call genetic nurture. Using results from a meta-analysis of educational attainment, the polygenic score computed for the non-transmitted alleles of 21,637 probands with at least one parent genotyped has an estimated effect on the educational attainment of the proband that is 29.9% ( P = 1.6×10 −14 ) of that of the transmitted polygenic score. Genetic nurturing effects of this polygenic score extend to other traits. Paternal and maternal polygenic scores have similar effects on educational attainment, but mothers contribute more than fathers to nutrition/heath related traits. One Sentence Summary: Nurture has a genetic component, i.e. alleles in the parents affect the parents’ phenotypes and through that influence the outcomes of the child.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/219261

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For height, the analogous estimate for non-transmitted alleles is only 6%.

    “(For height, the analogous estimate is only 6%.)”

    From Gene discovery and polygenic prediction from a genome-wide association study of educational attainment in 1.1 million individuals (2018) · cites this paper as [15]

    The section ‘The nature of genetic nurture and other polygenic scores’ (page unavailable) reports an association between height and a non-transmitted height polygenic score, but gives no 6% estimate; it says most of the observed effect is estimated to be due to assortative-mating confounding. The height row of Table 1 (page unavailable) uses an educational-attainment polygenic score and does not establish the claimed 6% figure. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A recent paper reports that a polygenic score for EduYears based entirely on parents' non-transmitted alleles is approximately 30% as predictive as a polygenic score based on transmitted alleles.

    “a recent paper15 reports that a polygenic score for EduYears based entirely on parents’ non-transmitted alleles is approximately 30% as predictive as a polygenic score based on transmitted alleles.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. G. Zhang et al., Assessing the Causal Relationship of Maternal Height on Birth Size and Gestational Age at Birth: A Mendelian Randomization Analysis. PLoS Med 12, e1001865 (2015).
  2. R. C. Richmond et al., Using Genetic Variation to Explore the Causal Effect of Maternal Pregnancy Adiposity on Future Offspring Adiposity: A Mendelian Randomisation Study. PLoS Med 14, e1002221 (2017).
  3. D. S. Falconer, T. F. C. Mackay, Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. (Pearson, 1996).
  4. M. R. Robinson et al., Genetic evidence of assortative mating in humans. Nature Human Behaviour 1, 0016 (2017).
  5. A. Young, et al., Estimating heritability without environmental bias. bioRxiv, DOI https://doi.org/10.1101/218883 (2017). · DOI
  6. S. Benonisdottir et al., Epigenetic and genetic components of height regulation. Nature communications 7, 13490 (2016).
  7. R. Dawkins, The Extended Phenotype. (Oxford University Press, 1982).
  8. D. F. Gudbjartsson et al., Sequence variants from whole genome sequencing a large group of Icelanders. Scientific data 2, 150011 (2015).
  9. A. Baud et al., Genetic Variation in the Social Environment Contributes to Health and Disease. PLoS Genet 13, e1006498 (2017).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kong, A., Thorleifsson, G., Frigge, M. L., Vilhjálmsson, B. J., Young, A. I., Thorgeirsson, T. E., Benonisdottir, S., Oddsson, A., Halldórsson, B. V., Masson, G., Gudbjartsson, D. F., Helgason, A., Bjornsdottir, G., Thorsteinsdottir, U., & Stefansson, K.
Affiliations
  • deCODE Genetics (Iceland) (IS)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Kong, Augustine
Venue
Science
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2017-11-14
Volume
359
Issue
6374
Pages
424-428
ISSN
0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2770085798
Cited by
949
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 85 · 2025: 100 · 2024: 102 · 2023: 110 · 2022: 130 · 2021: 122 · 2020: 170 · 2019: 84 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 3
FWCI
63.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Scopus (Elsevier) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Keywords
genetic nurture, parental genotypes, polygenic risk score, educational attainment, parental environment, gene-environment mediation, offspring fitness
MeSH terms
Alleles, Child, Child Development, Educational Status, Fathers, Female, Genotype, Humans, Male, Maternal Behavior, Mothers, Parent-Child Relations, Paternal Behavior, Multifactorial Inheritance, Genomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review