PreprintCited by 12Ion channel regulation and functionProtein Structure and DynamicsIon Transport and Channel Regulation

Dynamical model of the CLC-2 ion channel exhibits a two-step gating mechanism

Open access
McKiernan, Keri A., Koster, Anna K., Maduke, Merritt, Pande, Vijay S.·2017·PLoS Computational Biology

Preprint — published as 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007530 · Paper page

Abstract

This work reports a dynamical Markov state model of CLC-2 “fast” (pore) gating, based on 600 microseconds of molecular dynamics (MD) simulation. In the starting conformation of our CLC-2 model, both outer and inner channel gates are closed. The first conformational change in our dataset involves rotation of the inner-gate backbone along residues S168-G169-I170. This change is strikingly similar to that observed in the cryo-EM structure of the bovine CLC-K channel, though the volume of the intracellular (inner) region of the ion conduction pathway is further expanded in our model. From this state (inner gate open and outer gate closed), two additional states are observed, each involving a unique rotameric flip of the outer-gate residue GLU ex . Both additional states involve conformational changes that orient GLU ex away from the extracellular (outer) region of the ion conduction pathway. In the first additional state, the rotameric flip of GLU ex results in an open, or near-open, channel pore. The equilibrium population of this state is low ( ∼ 1%), consistent with the low open probability of CLC-2 observed experimentally in the absence of a membrane potential stimulus (0 mV). In the second additional state, GLU ex rotates to occlude the channel pore. This state, which has a low equilibrium population ( ∼ 1%), is only accessible when GLU ex is protonated. Together, these pathways model the opening of both an inner and outer gate within the CLC-2 selectivity filter, as a function of GLU ex protonation. Collectively, our findings are consistent with published experimental analyses of CLC-2 gating and provide a high-resolution structural model to guide future investigations. Author summary: In the brain, the roles and mechanisms of sodium-, potassium-, and calcium-selective ion channels are well established. In contrast, chloride-selective channels have been studied much less and are not sufficiently understood, despite known associations of chloride-channel defects with brain disorders. The most broadly expressed voltage-activated chloride channel in the brain is CLC-2 (one of 9 human CLC homologs). In this work, we use simulations to model the conformational dynamics of the CLC-2 chloride ion channel selectivity filter (SF), which is the part of the protein that controls whether the channel is in an ion-conducting or non-conducting state. Our analysis identifies four primary conformational states and a specific progression through these states. Our results are consistent with structural and functional data in the literature and provide a high-resolution model for guiding further studies of CLC-2. These results will inform our understanding of how CLC-2 governs electrical activity and ion homeostasis in the brain.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/228163

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
McKiernan, K. A., Koster, A. K., Maduke, M., & Pande, V. S.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
McKiernan, Keri A.
Venue
PLoS Computational Biology
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2017-12-03
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
e1007530-e1007530
ISSN
1553-734X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3013783484
Cited by
12
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • PLoS Computational Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5u19ai109662-05, U19 AI109662, AI109662)
  • Stanford Bio-X
  • Chemistry, Engineering and Medicine for Human Health, Stanford University
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM062868, R01GM113195)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (U19-AI109662)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion channel regulation and function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion Transport and Channel Regulation
Keywords
selectivity filter, conformational change, Markov state models, ion conduction pathway, open probability
MeSH terms
CLC-2 Chloride Channels, Animals, Cattle, Chlorides, Kinetics, Markov Chains, Membrane Potentials, Models, Biological, Molecular Conformation, Mutation, Ion Channel Gating, Chloride Channels, Computational Biology, Molecular Dynamics Simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review