Segmenting accelerometer data from daily life with unsupervised machine learning
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1371/journal.pone.0208692 · Paper page
Abstract
Purpose: Accelerometers are increasingly used to obtain valuable descriptors of physical activity for health research. The cut-points approach to segment accelerometer data is widely used in physical activity research but requires resource expensive calibration studies and does not make it easy to explore the information that can be gained for a variety of raw data metrics. To address these limitations, we present a data-driven approach for segmenting and clustering the accelerometer data using unsupervised machine learning. Methods: The data used came from five hundred fourteen-year-old participants from the Millennium cohort study who wore an accelerometer (GENEActiv) on their wrist on one weekday and one weekend day. A Hidden Semi-Markov Model (HSMM), configured to identify a maximum of ten behavioral states from five second averaged acceleration with and without addition of x, y, and z-angles, was used for segmenting and clustering of the data. A cut-points approach was used as comparison. Results: Time spent in behavioral states with or without angle metrics constituted eight and five principal components to reach 95% explained variance, respectively; in comparison four components were identified with the cut-points approach. In the HSMM with acceleration and angle as input, the distributions for acceleration in the states showed similar groupings as the cut-points categories, while more variety was seen in the distribution of angles. Conclusion: Our unsupervised classification approach learns a construct of human behavior based on the data it observes, without the need for resource expensive calibration studies, has the ability to combine multiple data metrics, and offers a higher dimensional description of physical behavior. States are interpretable from the distributions of observations and by their duration.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Activity Recognition and Abnormality Detection with the Switching Hidden Semi-Markov Model
Duong, T. V., Bui, H. H., Phung, D. Q., & Venkatesh, S. (2005) · 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2005.61 · Cited by 535 · see citing works
Activity recognition using semi-Markov models on real world smart home datasets
van Kasteren, T. L. M., Englebienne, G., & Kröse, B. J. A. (2010) · Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments · doi:10.3233/ais-2010-0070 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rowlands, A. V. (2018) · Pediatric Exercise Science · doi:10.1123/pes.2018-0201 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
- Authors
- van Kuppevelt, D., Heywood, J., Hamer, M., Sabia, S., Fitzsimons, E., & van Hees, V.
- Affiliations
- University College London (GB)
- Loughborough University (GB)
- Institute for Fiscal Studies (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Fitzsimons, Emla
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2018-02-13
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- e0208692-e0208692
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6326431
- OpenAlex
- W2950577792
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 2.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Loughborough University Institutional Repository (Loughborough University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Loughborough University Research Repository (Loughborough University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Department for Employment and Learning, Northern Ireland
- Medical Research Council (MR/K013351/1, MR/R024227/1)
- Economic and Social Research Council (ES/M001660/1, ES/K005987/1)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Time Series Analysis and Forecasting
- Keywords
- physical activity, unsupervised clustering, hidden semi-Markov model, behavioral state, wrist-worn accelerometers, daily behavior, older adults, Millennium Cohort Study
- MeSH terms
- Unsupervised Machine Learning, Humans, Exercise, Accelerometry
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review