The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Protein interaction energy landscapes are shaped by functional and also non-functional partners
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1016/j.jmb.2019.12.047 · Paper page
Abstract
In the crowded cell, a strong selective pressure operates on the proteome to limit the competition between functional and non-functional protein-protein interactions. We developed an original theoretical framework in order to interrogate how this competition constrains the behavior of proteins with respect to their partners or random encounters. Our theoretical framework relies on a two-dimensional (2D) representation of interaction energy landscapes with 2D energy maps that reflect in a synthetic way the propensity of a protein to interact with another protein. We investigated the propensity of protein surfaces to interact with functional and arbitrary partners and asked whether their interaction propensity is conserved during the evolution. Therefore, we performed several thousands of cross-docking simulations to systematically characterize the whole energy landscapes of 74 proteins interacting with different sets of homologs, corresponding to their functional partner’s family or arbitrary protein families. Then, we systematically compared the energy maps resulting from the docking of a given protein with the different protein families of the dataset. Strikingly, we show that the interaction propensity not only of the binding site but also of the rest of the protein surface is conserved for docking partners belonging to the same protein family. Interestingly, this observation holds for docked proteins corresponding to true but also to arbitrary partners. Our theoretical framework enables the characterization of the energy behavior of a protein in interaction with hundreds of selected partners and opens the way for further developments to study the behavior of proteins in a specific environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Milo, R. (2013) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.201300066 · Cited by 614
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 82
- 10.7554/eLife.18715 · DOI
- 10.1017/s0033583508004708 · DOI
- 10.1038/nbt1519 · DOI
- 10.1093/emboj/cdg359 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature06523 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000694 · DOI
- 10.7554/eLife.19274 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.copbio.2010.09.009 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0959-440X(00)00172-X · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.04.009 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.052706099 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.0702766104 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0812414106 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.03.010 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature23320 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jmb.2003.07.006 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1009392108 · DOI
- 10.1021/bi201287e · DOI
- 10.1021/jacs.6b11058 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1621227114 · DOI
- 10.2460/javma.242.4.458. · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2008.05.042 · DOI
- 10.1038/msb.2008.48 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1209312109 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1117408109 · DOI
- 10.7554/eLife.30084 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq444 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0024657 · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.24400 · DOI
- 10.1038/msb.2011.3 · DOI
- 10.1186/1753-6561-7-S7-S6 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003369 · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.25086 · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.25206 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jmb.2003.10.069 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/pro.3280 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.041 · DOI
- 10.1038/nrm1700 · DOI
- 10.1111/febs.12491 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1993.tb17904.x · DOI
- 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80790-4 · DOI
- 10.1016/0022-2836(82)90515-0 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1093-3263(02)00203-6 · DOI
- 10.2307/3001913 · DOI
- 10.1006/jmbi.1998.2439 · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.10085 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.09.051 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.10.077 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002677 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature05201 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.1417415112 · DOI
- 10.7554/eLife.01370 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.sbi.2010.10.002 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jmb.2013.01.014 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx616 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jmb.2014.04.017 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.08.002 · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.21679 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.sbi.2013.06.014 · DOI
- 10.1006/jmbi.2001.4630 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp111 · DOI
- 10.1021/ci500158y · DOI
- 10.1186/1477-5956-10-S1-S1 · DOI
- 10.1109/VARMS.2015.7151723 · DOI
- 10.1186/s12900-016-0055-7 · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.22030 · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.22141 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jmb.2015.07.016 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gkr845 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkh086 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gki051 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkj003 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkj109 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gkl958 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkw363 · DOI
- 10.1261/rna.1563609 · DOI
- 10.1186/1471-2105-12-77 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.media.2006.12.002 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gki524 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1186/1472-6807-9-27 · DOI
- 10.1002/jcc.20065 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Schweke, H., Mucchielli, M.-H., Sacquin-Mora, S., Bei, W., & Lopes, A.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Université Paris-Sud (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Lopes, Anne
- Venue
- Journal of Molecular Biology
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2018-04-09
- Volume
- 432
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1183-1198
- ISSN
- 0022-2836 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3000093000
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 0.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Molecular Biology (acceptedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-11-LABX-0011)
- Grand Équipement National De Calcul Intensif (DARI A0030707460)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
- Keywords
- protein-protein interaction, protein surface, protein families, binding sites, protein evolution, protein-protein docking
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Protein Binding, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Sequence Analysis, Protein, Protein Interaction Mapping, Databases, Protein, Molecular Docking Simulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review