PreprintCited by 367Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications

Integrated Proteomics Reveals Brain-Based Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers in Asymptomatic and Symptomatic Alzheimer’s Disease

Open access
Higginbotham, Lenora, Ping, Lingyan, Dammer, Eric B., Duong, Duc M., Zhou, Maotian, Gearing, Marla, Johnson, Erik C.B., Hajjar, Ihab +3 more·2019·Science Advances

Preprint — published as 10.1126/sciadv.aaz9360 · Paper page

Abstract

Abstract Alzheimer’s disease (AD) features a complex web of pathological processes beyond amyloid accumulation and tau-mediated neuronal death. To meaningfully advance AD therapeutics, there is an urgent need for novel biomarkers that comprehensively reflect these disease mechanisms. Here we applied an integrative proteomics approach to identify cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers linked to a diverse set of pathophysiological processes in the diseased brain. Using multiplex proteomics, we identified >3,500 proteins across 40 CSF samples from control and AD patients and >12,000 proteins across 48 postmortem brain tissues from control, asymptomatic AD (AsymAD), AD, and other neurodegenerative cases. Co-expression network analysis of the brain tissues resolved 44 protein modules, nearly half of which significantly correlated with AD neuropathology. Fifteen modules robustly overlapped with proteins quantified in the CSF, including 271 CSF markers highly altered in AD. These 15 overlapping modules were collapsed into five panels of brain-linked fluid markers representing a variety of cortical functions. Neuron-enriched synaptic and metabolic panels demonstrated decreased levels in the AD brain but increased levels in diseased CSF. Conversely, glial-enriched myelination and immunity panels were highly increased in both the brain and CSF. Using high-throughput proteomic analysis, proteins from these panels were validated in an independent CSF cohort of control, AsymAD, and AD samples. Remarkably, several validated markers were significantly altered in AsymAD CSF and appeared to stratify subpopulations within this cohort. Overall, these brain-linked CSF biomarker panels represent a promising step toward a physiologically comprehensive tool that could meaningfully enhance the prognostic and therapeutic management of AD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/806752

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • OLFML3, SPON1, and SLIT2 stood out in this study and reference study 1 (data vi).

    “OLFML3, SPON1, and SLIT2 stood out in this study and reference study 1 (data vi) [33].”

    From Integrated analysis of ultra-deep proteomes in cortex, cerebrospinal fluid and serum reveals a mitochondrial signature in Alzheimer’s disease (2020) · cites this paper as [33]

    The figure listing brain-linked CSF panels includes OLFML3 in the vascular panel and SPON1 in the glial-immunity panel (Figure S2 section; page unavailable). Our copy does not identify SLIT2 or establish that all three proteins stood out, so it supports only part of the attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • SMOC1 and GPNMB have been reported as putative CSF biomarkers in previous studies.

    “While, SMOC1 and GPNMB have been reported as putative CSF biomarkers in previous studies [18, 33, 62]”

    From Integrated analysis of ultra-deep proteomes in cortex, cerebrospinal fluid and serum reveals a mitochondrial signature in Alzheimer’s disease (2020) · cites this paper as [33]

    The replication-cohort section identifies SMOC1 as a validated brain-linked CSF marker, supporting that part of the claim. A search of our copy for GPNMB found no passage reporting it as a CSF biomarker, so this source does not support the GPNMB part. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Mitochondrial changes can co-occur with amyloid deposition early in the brain of asymptomatic cases with amyloid pathology, as well as mild cognitive impairment subjects.

    “Mitochondrial changes can co-occur with amyloid deposition early in the brain of asymptomatic cases with amyloid pathology, as well as mild cognitive impairment subjects [18, 33, 75].”

    From Integrated analysis of ultra-deep proteomes in cortex, cerebrospinal fluid and serum reveals a mitochondrial signature in Alzheimer’s disease (2020) · cites this paper as [33]

    The section on asymptomatic AD brain proteomics (page unavailable) reports high amyloid burden and presymptomatic protein changes in cognitively normal cases. The brain-network analysis links a mitochondrial protein module to AD pathology, but does not establish mitochondrial changes in the asymptomatic cases specifically. The paper's brain cohorts do not include a mild cognitive impairment group, so that part of the claim is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Mitochondrial protein decreases in Alzheimer's disease CSF and serum have rarely been reported until the availability of deep CSF/serum profiling.

    “In this study, we identified consistent and evident mitochondrial protein decreases in AD CSF and serum samples, which have rarely reported until the availability of the deep CSF/serum profiling (our reference datasets) [25, 33].”

    From Integrated analysis of ultra-deep proteomes in cortex, cerebrospinal fluid and serum reveals a mitochondrial signature in Alzheimer’s disease (2020) · cites this paper as [33]

    The ‘CSF Proteome Reveals Markers Significantly Altered in AD’ section describes deep CSF protein profiling, supporting that part of the citation. The paper analyzes brain and CSF datasets, not serum, and the passages do not say that mitochondrial-protein decreases in AD CSF or serum had rarely been reported; its Discussion instead describes predominantly increased abundance of neuronal metabolic-panel proteins in AD CSF. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.80)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Several other groups used similar strategies in AD biomarker studies.

    “In addition, several other groups used the similar strategies in AD biomarker studies [33, 34].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 122 · Cited by 367

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Henry, M.S., A.P. Passmore, S. Todd, B. McGuinness, D. Craig, and J.A. Johnston, The development of effective biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease: a review. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry, 2013. 28(4): p. 331-40.
  2. Nelson, P.T., I. Alafuzoff, E.H. Bigio, C. Bouras, H. Braak, N.J. Cairns, R.J. Castellani, B.J. Crain, P. Davies, K. Del Tredici, C. Duyckaerts, M.P. Frosch, V. Haroutunian, P.R. Hof, C.M. Hulette, B.T. Hyman, T. Iwatsubo, K.A. Jellinger, G.A. Jicha, E. Kovari, W.A. Kukull, J.B. Leverenz, S. Love, I.R. Mackenzie, D.M. Mann, E. Masliah, A.C. McKee, T.J. Montine, J.C. Morris, J.A. Schneider, J.A. Sonnen, D.R. Thal, J.Q. Trojanowski, J.C. Troncoso, T. Wisniewski, R.L. Woltjer, and T.G. Beach, Correlation of Alzheimer disease neuropathologic changes with cognitive status: a review of the literature. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol, 2012. 71(5): p. 362-81.
  3. Dubois, B., H. Hampel, H.H. Feldman, P. Scheltens, P. Aisen, S. Andrieu, H. Bakardjian, H. Benali, L. Bertram, K. Blennow, K. Broich, E. Cavedo, S. Crutch, J.F. Dartigues, C. Duyckaerts, S. Epelbaum, G.B. Frisoni, S. Gauthier, R. Genthon, A.A. Gouw, M.O. Habert, D.M. Holtzman, M. Kivipelto, S. Lista, J.L. Molinuevo, S.E. O'Bryant, G.D. Rabinovici, C. Rowe, S. Salloway, L.S. Schneider, R. Sperling, M. Teichmann, M.C. Carrillo, J. Cummings, C.R. Jack, Jr., G. Proceedings of the Meeting of the International Working, A.D. the American Alzheimer's Association on "The Preclinical State of, July, and U.S.A. Washington Dc, Preclinical Alzheimer's disease: Definition, natural history, and diagnostic criteria. Alzheimers Dement, 2016. 12(3): p. 292-323.
  4. Hyman, B.T. and J.Q. Trojanowski, Editorial on Consensus Recommendations for the Postmortem Diagnosis of Alzheimer Disease from the National Institute on Aging and the Reagan Institute Working Group on Diagnostic Criteria for the Neuropathological Assessment of Alzheimer Disease. Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology, 1997. 56(10): p. 1095-1097.
  5. Brown, D.F., M.A. Dababo, E.H. Bigio, R.C. Risser, K.P. Eagan, C.L. Hladik, and C.L. White, III, Neuropathologic Evidence that the Lewy Body Variant of Alzheimer Disease Represents Coexistence of Alzheimer Disease and Idiopathic Parkinson Disease. Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology, 1998. 57(1): p. 39-46.
  6. Boros, B.D., K.M. Greathouse, E.G. Gentry, K.A. Curtis, E.L. Birchall, M. Gearing, and J.H. Herskowitz, Dendritic spines provide cognitive resilience against Alzheimer's disease. Annals of neurology, 2017. 82(4): p. 602-614.
  7. Tukey, J.W., Exploratory Data Analysis. 1977: Addison-Wesley.
  8. Langfelder, P. and S. Horvath, Fast R Functions for Robust Correlations and Hierarchical Clustering. Journal of statistical software, 2012. 46(11): p. i11.

Authors
Higginbotham, L., Ping, L., Dammer, E. B., Duong, D. M., Zhou, M., Gearing, M., Johnson, E. C. B., Hajjar, I., Lah, J. J., Levey, A. I., & Seyfried, N. T.
Affiliations
Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Levey, Allan I.
  • Seyfried, Nicholas T.
Venue
Science Advances
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2019-10-16
Volume
6
Issue
43
ISSN
2375-2548 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3093903285
Cited by
367
References
122
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 77 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 84 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
27.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Science Advances (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Foundation for the National Institutes of Health
  • Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research
  • Alzheimer's Association
  • Weston Brain Institute (11060)
  • Alzheimer’s Research UK
  • National Institute on Aging (RF1AG057470, R01AG057911, U01AG061357, U01AG046161, RF1AG057471, P50AG025688, R01AG057339, R01AG053960, R01AG061800)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (P30NS055077)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers, brain proteome, protein panels, network analysis, synaptic proteins, metabolic proteins, glial proteins, myelination, neuroinflammation, asymptomatic Alzheimer's disease
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Brain, Humans, Biomarkers, Proteome, Proteomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review