The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
En-1 and En-2, two mouse genes with sequence homology to the Drosophila engrailed gene: expression during embryogenesis.
Open accessAbstract
Two mouse genes, En-1 and En-2, have sequence homology to the engrailed (en) and invected (inv) genes of Drosophila (Joyner et al. 1985). Partial nucleotide sequence analyses of genomic and cDNA clones show that the homologous sequences can encode a stretch of 107 amino acids, including a centrally located, 60-amino-acid homeo box. Within the homologous regions of the mouse and Drosophila genes, 78 (73%) of the amino acids are identical. Such extensive conservation of sequence outside the homeo box between vertebrate and Drosophila homeo box-containing genes is thus far unique. En-1 and En-2 are expressed during mouse embryogenesis. Transcripts from both genes were detected in RNA samples from teratocarcinoma cells, which serve as in vitro models for the early embryo, and from embryos at 9.5 through 17.5 days of development. For each gene we observed a unique pattern of changes in the number and relative intensities of transcripts detectable during embryonic development. Transcripts from both genes are represented abundantly in RNA extracted from the posterior portion of the fetal brain, and are much less abundant in RNA from other fetal tissues, including the anterior portion of the brain and the spinal cord. The chromosome map positions of En-1 and En-2 were determined by recombinant inbred strain analyses. Unlike their Drosophila counterparts, they are unlinked: En-1 is in the central portion of the mouse chromosome 1 and En-2 is in the proximal portion of mouse chromosome 5. Both genes map in the vicinity of mutations that are known to cause abnormalities during development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Coleman, K. G., Poole, S. J., Weir, M. P., Soeller, W. C., & Kornberg, T. (1987) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.1.1.19 · Cited by 153
Cited by
Preservation of Duplicate Genes by Complementary, Degenerative Mutations
Force, A., Lynch, M., Pickett, F. B., Amores, A., Yan, Y.-L., & Postlethwait, J. (1999) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/151.4.1531 · Cited by 3,529
Homeobox genes and axial patterning
McGinnis, W., & Krumlauf, R. (1992) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(92)90471-n · Cited by 2,674
Expression of engrailed proteins in arthropods, annelids, and chordates
Patel, N. H., Martin-Blanco, E., Coleman, K. G., Poole, S. J., Ellis, M. C., Kornberg, T. B., & Goodman, C. S. (1989) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(89)90947-1 · Cited by 1,014
Okabe, S., Forsberg-Nilsson, K., Spiro, A. C., Segal, M., & McKay, R. D. G. (1996) · Mechanisms of Development · doi:10.1016/0925-4773(96)00572-2 · Cited by 770
Murine Developmental Control Genes
Kessel, M., & Gruss, P. (1990) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1974085 · Cited by 585
Metadata
- Authors
- Joyner, A. L., & Martin, G. R.
- Venue
- Genes & Development
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 1987-03
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 29-38
- ISSN
- 0890-9369 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-5477
- OpenAlex
- W2125082575
- Cited by
- 328
- References
- 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: En-1 and En-2, two mouse genes with sequence homology to the Drosophila engrailed gene: expression during embryogenesis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/gad.1.1.29
- The paper
- Joyner, A. L., & Martin, G. R. (1987). En-1 and En-2, two mouse genes with sequence homology to the Drosophila engrailed gene: expression during embryogenesis. Genes & Development. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1.1.29
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.