The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Oct-1 POU domain-DNA interactions: cooperative binding of isolated subdomains and effects of covalent linkage.
Open accessAbstract
Structural and biochemical studies of Oct-1 POU domain-DNA interactions have raised important questions about cooperativity and the role of the linker connecting the POU-specific domain and the POU homeo domain. To analyze these interactions, we have studied binding of the isolated domains. Surprisingly, we find that two unlinked polypeptides corresponding to the POU-specific domain and the POU homeo domain bind cooperatively to the octamer site and have a coupling energy of 1.6 kcal/mole. We suggest that overlapping DNA contacts near the center of the octamer site may be the source of this cooperativity, as there are no protein-protein contacts between the domains in the crystal structure of the Oct-1 POU domain-DNA complex. These studies also have allowed us to describe the thermodynamic contribution of the linker (present in the intact POU domain) in terms of an effective concentration (3.6 mM). The broader implications for understanding cooperativity in protein-DNA recognition and gene regulation are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“On lower affinity sites, however, the chelating effect provided by the linker may lower the overall entropic cost associated with binding, allowing PipPU to bind as efficiently as the wildtype proteins”
From Assembly requirements of PU.1–Pip (IRF‐4) activator complexes: inhibiting function in vivo using fused dimers (1999) · cites this paper as Klemm and Pabo, 1996
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Zinc Finger-DNA Recognition: Crystal Structure of a Zif268-DNA Complex at 2.1 Å
Pavletich, N. P., & Pabo, C. O. (1991) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2028256 · Cited by 2,081
Self-citationGuan, K., & Dixon, J. (1991) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0003-2697(91)90534-z · Cited by 1,735
Crystal Structure of a CAP-DNA Complex: the DNA Is Bent by 90°
Schultz, S. C., Shields, G. C., & Steitz, T. A. (1991) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1653449 · Cited by 1,116
Crystal structure of a yeast TBP/TATA-box complex
Kim, Y., Geiger, J. H., Hahn, S., & Sigler, P. B. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/365512a0 · Cited by 1,085
Co-crystal structure of TBP recognizing the minor groove of a TATA element
Kim, J. L., Nikolov, D. B., & Burley, S. K. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/365520a0 · Cited by 1,065
Crystal Structure of a Five-Finger GLI-DNA Complex: New Perspectives on Zinc Fingers
Pavletich, N. P., & Pabo, C. O. (1993) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.8378770 · Cited by 669
Self-citationKlemm, J. D., Rould, M. A., Aurora, R., Herr, W., & Pabo, C. O. (1994) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(94)90231-3 · Cited by 506
Self-citationStructure of the lambda complex at 2.5 A resolution: details of the repressor-operator interactions
Jordan, & Pabo, C. (1988) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3187530 · Cited by 407
Self-citationHerr, W., & Cleary, M. A. (1995) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.9.14.1679 · Cited by 388
Proteins : structures and molecular principles
Creighton, T. E. (1983) · W.H. Freeman eBooks · Cited by 358
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–134 of 134
The homeodomain of Oct4 is a dimeric binder of methylated CpG elements
Tan, D. S., Cheung, S. L., Gao, Y., Weinbuch, M., Hu, H., Shi, L., Ti, S.-C., Hutchins, A. P., Cojocaru, V., & Jauch, R. (2022) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1262 · Cited by 11
“This is consistent with previous studies demonstrating that the POUS of Oct1 only binds Octamer DNA at high concentrations with strict sequence constraints (88,89).”
ResultA DNA-Assisted Binding Assay for Weak Protein–Protein Interactions
Frato, K. E., & Schleif, R. F. (2009) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2009.09.064 · Cited by 11
Mechanisms and factors in embryonic stem cell self-renewal
Chambers, I. (2005) · RENDICONTI LINCEI · doi:10.1007/bf02904758 · Cited by 10
Crystallization of redox-insensitive Oct1 POU domain with different DNA-response elements
Reményi, A., Pohl, E., Schöler, H. R., & Wilmanns, M. (2001) · Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s090744490101099x · Cited by 10
Syndromes associated with Homo sapiens Pol II regulatory genes
Bina, M., Demmon, S. L., & Parés-Matos, E. I. (2000) · Progress in nucleic acid research and molecular biology · doi:10.1016/s0079-6603(00)64005-9 · Cited by 10
New Insights into Cooperative Binding of Homeodomain Transcription Factors PREP1 and PBX1 to DNA
Zucchelli, C., Ferrari, E., Blasi, F., Musco, G., & Bruckmann, C. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep40665 · Cited by 9
Conservative Val47 residue of POU homeodomain: role in DNA recognition
Степченко, А. Г., Nn, L., & Polanovsky, O. L. (1997) · FEBS Letters · doi:10.1016/s0014-5793(97)00508-5 · Cited by 9
Park, J. H., Kwon, H. W., & Jeong, K. J. (2013) · Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering · doi:10.1016/j.jbiosc.2013.02.005 · Cited by 8
BRN2 in Melanocytic Cell Development, Differentiation, and Transformation
Cook, A. L., Boyle, G. M., Leonard, J. H., Parsons, P. G., & Sturm, R. A. (2007) · Humana Press eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-59259-994-3_8 · Cited by 7
“The 5' ATGC motif and the 3' AAAT sequence can be considered as half sites ( 21 ), because the crystal structure of the Oct-1 POU domain bound to this sequence demonstrated that each subdomain binds to separate halves of the octamer motif on opposite faces of the DNA helix (22).”
BackgroundArm–domain interactions can provide high binding cooperativity
Schleif, R. F., & Wolberger, C. (2004) · Protein Science · doi:10.1110/ps.04908404 · Cited by 6
“…peptide arms, the estimation we present here based on the concept of local concentration (Crothers and Metzger 1972; Margossian and Lowey 1978; Klemm and Pabo 1996) should be instructive in evaluating interactions in other systems and determining whether it is necessary to invoke factors…”
BackgroundThe homeodomain regulates stable DNA binding of prostate cancer target ONECUT2
Chatterjee, A., Gallent, B., Katiki, M., Qian, C., Harter, M. R., Silletti, S., Komives, E. A., Freeman, M. R., & Murali, R. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-53159-8 · Cited by 5
Langdon, R. C., Burr, T., Pagán-Westphal, S. M., & Hochschild, A. (2001) · Molecular Microbiology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02583.x · Cited by 5
“The co-crystal structure of the Oct-1 POU domain‐DNA complex reveals that there are no protein‐protein contacts between the two DNA-binding modules (Klemm et al., 1994), suggesting that, in this case, DNA-binding affinity and specificity are enhanced in large part by virtue of the apparently flexible tether that conne…”
BackgroundTranscription Factors of Direct Neuronal Reprogramming in Ontogenesis and Ex Vivo
Samoilova, E. M., Викторович, Б. В., & Baklaushev, V. P. (2021) · Molecular Biology · doi:10.1134/s0026893321040087 · Cited by 5
Insect Homeotic Complex Genes and Development, Lessons From Drosophila and Beyond ☆
Robertson, L. K., & Mahaffey, J. W. (2016) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-809633-8.04008-5 · Cited by 5
Транскрипционные факторы прямого пронейронального репрограммирования в онтогенезе и ex vivo
Samoilova, E. M., Викторович, Б. В., & Baklaushev, V. P. (2021) · Molecular Biology · doi:10.31857/s0026898421050086 · Cited by 4
Ribeiro, E. A., Leyrat, C., Gérard, F. C. A., & Jamin, M. (2024) · Viruses · doi:10.3390/v16111735 · Cited by 4
Han, M., Park, S., Do, H., Chung, H., Song, H., Kim, J., Kim, N., Park, K.-H., & Kim, J. (2016) · Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin · doi:10.1248/bpb.b16-00299 · Cited by 4
A race model for singular olfactory receptor expression
Kolterman, B. E., Iossifov, I. H., & Koulakov, A. A. (2012) · Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Institutional Repository (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1201.2933 · Cited by 3
POU-domain gene expression during spermatogenesis
Zini, A. S., Mielnik, A., & Schlegel, P. N. (1996) · World Journal of Urology · doi:10.1007/bf00184599 · Cited by 3
“Cooperative binding of the subdomains has been demonstrated in a study that found high DNA-binding efficiency for the isolated (unlinked) POU s and POUH subdomains [11].”
BackgroundInsect Homeotic Complex Genes and Development, Lessons from Drosophila and Beyond
Robertson, L. K., & Mahaffey, J. W. (2005) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b0-44-451924-6/00004-1 · Cited by 3
Transcription, Translation, and the Control of Gene Expression
Mullick, A., & Massie, B. (2000) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/0471250570.spi102 · Cited by 2
Subramaniam, S., Kamadurai, H., & Foster, M. P. (2007) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2007.04.024 · Cited by 2
“The ratio of the affinities of the separate and linked constructs, (KD,CBKD,Cat/KD,CB+Cat) yields the effective concentration of one linked domain in the presence of the other,35 which in this case is 5.5 mM; this result is similar to that obtained for the cooperating domains of Oct-1.”
ResultInfluentialStructural Aspects of NF-_B and I_B Proteins
Ghosh, G., Moorthy, A. K., & Huxford, T. (2006) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781420004274.ch2 · Cited by 1
“Chance Favors the Prepared Mind”
Todoroki, S. (2017) · University of Pittsburgh Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctt6wrdfm.10 · Cited by 1
B��rglin, T. R. (2006) · Wiley-VCH eBooks · doi:10.1002/3527600906.mcb.200400039 · Cited by 1
Control of Pluripotency and Reprogramming
Czeisler, C. M., Gygli, P. E., & Otero, J. J. (2014) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-405544-5.00002-2
Transcription, Translation, and the Control of Gene Expression in Mammalian Cells
Mullick, A., & Massie, B. (2010) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470054581.eib565
Structure/Function Studies of the Androgen Receptor DNA-Binding Region
Rastinejad, F. (2001) · doi:10.21236/ada398061
Alkhori, L. (2014) · Linköping University Electronic Press eBooks · doi:10.3384/diss.diva-104706
Structural and functional studies on the pituitary-specific transcription factor Pit-1
Augustijn, K. D. (2002) · Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University)
Cox, M., Boelens, R., van der Vliet, P. C., & Kaptein, R. (1997) · Nucleic acids and molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-60691-5_15
Chen, L., Wang, R.-S., & Zhang, X.-S. (2009) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470488065.refs
Faculty Opinions recommendation of Nucleosome allostery in pioneer transcription factor binding.
Henikoff, S. (2020) · Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature · doi:10.3410/f.738482142.793577928
Control of Pluripotency and Reprogramming
Czeisler, C. M., Gygli, P. E., & Otero, J. J. (2015) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-820719-2.00002-8
Metadata
- Authors
- Klemm, J. D., & Pabo, C. O.
- Affiliations
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
- ORCID
- Klemm, J D
- Venue
- Genes & Development
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 1996-01-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 27-36
- ISSN
- 0890-9369 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-5477
- OpenAlex
- W2160488560
- Cited by
- 134
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Genes & Development (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute
- National Institutes of Health (5r01gm031471-16, GM31471)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM-31471)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Diffusion and Search Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Keywords
- Oct-1, POU domain, protein-DNA interactions, cooperative binding, binding thermodynamics, protein-DNA recognition, gene expression regulation
- MeSH terms
- Base Sequence, Binding Sites, Deoxyribonuclease I, DNA-Binding Proteins, Genes, Homeobox, Models, Molecular, Molecular Sequence Data, Mutation, Peptide Fragments, Thermodynamics, Transcription Factors, Homeodomain Proteins, DNA Footprinting, Octamer Transcription Factor-1, Host Cell Factor C1
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review