The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
In vitro propagation and transcriptional profiling of human mammary stem/progenitor cells
Open accessAbstract
Although the existence of mammary stem cells has been suggested by serial transplantation studies in mice, their identification has been hindered by the lack of specific surface markers, and by the absence of suitable in vitro assays for testing stem cell properties: self-renewal and ability to generate differentiated progeny. We have developed an in vitro cultivation system that allows for propagation of human mammary epithelial cells (HMECs) in an undifferentiated state, based on their ability to proliferate in suspension, as nonadherent mammospheres. We demonstrate that nonadherent mammospheres are enriched in early progenitor/stem cells and able to differentiate along all three mammary epithelial lineages and to clonally generate complex functional structures in reconstituted 3D culture systems. Gene expression analysis of cells isolated from nonadherent mammospheres revealed overlapping genetic programs with other stem and progenitor cells and identified new markers that may be useful in the identification of mammary stem cells. The isolation and characterization of these stem cells should help elucidate the molecular pathways that govern normal mammary development and carcinogenesis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Zhou, S., Schuetz, J. D., Bunting, K. D., Colapietro, A.-M., Sampath, J., Morris, J. J., Lagutina, I., Grosveld, G. C., Osawa, M., Nakauchi, H., et al. (2001) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm0901-1028 · Cited by 2,280
Accuracy and calibration of commercial oligonucleotide and custom cDNA microarrays
Yuen, T. (2002) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/30.10.e48 · Cited by 520
Cited by
Cancer stem cells in solid tumours: accumulating evidence and unresolved questions
Visvader, J. E., & Lindeman, G. J. (2008) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc2499 · Cited by 3,429
Identification of Selective Inhibitors of Cancer Stem Cells by High-Throughput Screening
Gupta, P. B., Onder, T. T., Jiang, G., Tao, K., Kuperwasser, C., Weinberg, R. A., & Lander, E. S. (2009) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.06.034 · Cited by 2,389
Generation of a functional mammary gland from a single stem cell
Shackleton, M., Vaillant, F., Simpson, K. J., Stingl, J., Smyth, G. K., Asselin-Labat, M.-L., Wu, L., Lindeman, G. J., & Visvader, J. E. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04372 · Cited by 2,005
Generation of Breast Cancer Stem Cells through Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition
Morel, A.-P., Lièvre, M., Thomas, C., Hinkal, G., Ansieau, S., & Puisieux, A. (2008) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0002888 · Cited by 1,645
Stochastic State Transitions Give Rise to Phenotypic Equilibrium in Populations of Cancer Cells
Gupta, P. B., Fillmore, C. M., Jiang, G., Shapira, S. D., Tao, K., Kuperwasser, C., & Lander, E. S. (2011) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.07.026 · Cited by 1,475
Metadata
- Authors
- Dontu, G., Abdallah, W. M., Foley, J. M., Jackson, K. W., Clarke, M. F., Kawamura, M. J., & Wicha, M. S.
- Venue
- Genes & Development
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 2003-05-15
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1253-1270
- ISSN
- 0890-9369 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-5477
- OpenAlex
- W2127617517
- Cited by
- 2,406
- References
- 2
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In vitro propagation and transcriptional profiling of human mammary stem/progenitor cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/gad.1061803
- The paper
- Dontu, G., Abdallah, W. M., Foley, J. M., Jackson, K. W., Clarke, M. F., Kawamura, M. J., & Wicha, M. S. (2003). In vitro propagation and transcriptional profiling of human mammary stem/progenitor cells. Genes & Development. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1061803
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.