Cited by 232Developmental Biology and Gene RegulationGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsRNA Research and Splicing

Relief of gene repression by Torso RTK signaling: role of capicua in Drosophila terminal and dorsoventral patterning

Open access
Jiménez, Gerardo, Guichet, Antoine, Ephrussi, Anne, Casanova, Jordi·2000·Genes & Development

Abstract

Differentiation of the embryonic termini in Drosophila depends on signaling by the Tor RTK, which induces terminal gene expression by inactivating at the embryonic poles a uniformly distributed repressor activity that involves the Gro corepressor. Here, we identify a new gene, cic, that acts as a repressor of terminal genes regulated by the Tor pathway. cic also mediates repression along the dorsoventral axis, a process that requires the Dorsal morphogen and Gro, and which is also inhibited by Tor signaling at the termini. cic encodes an HMG-box transcription factor that interacts with Gro in vitro. We present evidence that Tor signaling regulates terminal patterning by inactivating Cic at the embryo poles. cic has been evolutionarily conserved, suggesting that Cic-like proteins may act as repressors regulated by RTK signaling in other organisms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/gad.14.2.224

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Torso signaling modulates the ability of Capicua, Cut, and Dri to function, proteins that influence the ability of Dorsal to function as a transcriptional repressor.

    “Torso signaling modulates the ability of Capicua (Cic), Cut, and Dri to function, proteins that influence the ability of Dorsal to function as a transcriptional repressor”

    From Graded dorsal and differential gene regulation in the Drosophila embryo. (2009) · cites this paper as Jimenez et al. 2000

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jiménez, G., Guichet, A., Ephrussi, A., & Casanova, J.
Affiliations
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES)
Venue
Genes & Development
Published
2000-01-15
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
224-231
ISSN
  • 0890-9369 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-5477
OpenAlex
W2096720319
Cited by
232
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 12
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genes & Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Generalitat de Catalunya
  • Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
Keywords
TOR signaling, Capicua, dorsoventral patterning, HMG-box transcription factor, receptor tyrosine kinase signaling, gene repression, Drosophila embryo, transcriptional repression
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Drosophila melanogaster, Female, High Mobility Group Proteins, Humans, Molecular Sequence Data, Mutation, Protein Processing, Post-Translational, Repressor Proteins, Suppression, Genetic, Transcription Factors, Signal Transduction, Conserved Sequence, Evolution, Molecular, Body Patterning, Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases, HMGB Proteins, Drosophila Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review