Cited by 320Sarcoma Diagnosis and TreatmentCancer Cells and MetastasisZebrafish Biomedical Research Applications

Effects of RAS on the genesis of embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma

Open access
Langenau, David M., Keefe, Matthew D., Storer, Narie Y., Guyon, Jeffrey R., Kutok, Jeffery L., Le, Xiuning, Goessling, Wolfram, Neuberg, Donna S. +2 more·2007·Genes & Development

Abstract

Embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma (ERMS) is a devastating cancer with specific features of muscle differentiation that can result from mutational activation of RAS family members. However, to date, RAS pathway activation has not been reported in a majority of ERMS patients. Here, we have created a zebrafish model of RAS-induced ERMS, in which animals develop externally visible tumors by 10 d of life. Microarray analysis and cross-species comparisons identified two conserved gene signatures found in both zebrafish and human ERMS, one associated with tumor-specific and tissue-restricted gene expression in rhabdomyosarcoma and a second comprising a novel RAS-induced gene signature. Remarkably, our analysis uncovered that RAS pathway activation is exceedingly common in human RMS. We also created a new transgenic coinjection methodology to fluorescently label distinct subpopulations of tumor cells based on muscle differentiation status. In conjunction with fluorescent activated cell sorting, cell transplantation, and limiting dilution analysis, we were able to identify the cancer stem cell in zebrafish ERMS. When coupled with gene expression studies of this cell population, we propose that the zebrafish RMS cancer stem cell shares similar self-renewal programs as those found in activated satellite cells.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/gad.1545007

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The zebrafish is a useful model for understanding normal and cancer stem cells.

    “The zebrafish is a useful model for understanding normal and cancer stem cells, but analysis has been limited to embryogenesis due to the opacity of the adult fish.”

    From Transparent Adult Zebrafish as a Tool for In Vivo Transplantation Analysis (2008) · cites this paper as Langenau et al., 2007

    In “Identifying the cancer stem cell in zERMS” (page unavailable), the paper uses zebrafish to isolate an ERMS cancer stem cell and compares it with normal muscle satellite cells. This supports the model’s usefulness for studying cancer stem cells, but the paper does not directly establish its usefulness for studying normal stem cells. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Prior work from the authors' laboratory demonstrated that the zebrafish is a useful model for understanding the genetics of hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells and tumor stem cell biology.

    “Prior work from our laboratory has demonstrated that the zebrafish is a useful model for understanding the genetics of both HSPC (Burns et al., 2005; Traver et al., 2004a”

    From Transparent Adult Zebrafish as a Tool for In Vivo Transplantation Analysis (2008) · cites this paper as Langenau et al., 2007

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Al-Hajj, M., Wicha, M.S., Benito-Hernandez, A., Morrison, S.J., and Clarke, M.F. 2003. Prospective identification of tumori- genic breast cancer cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 100: 3983- 3988.
  2. Berghmans, S., Murphey, R.D., Wienholds, E., Neuberg, D., Ku- tok, J.L., Fletcher, C.D., Morris, J.P., Liu, T.X., Schulte- Merker, S., Kanki, J.P., et al. 2005. tp53 mutant zebrafish develop malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 102: 407-412.
  3. Irvine, K., Stirling, R., Hume, D., and Kennedy, D. 2004. Ras- putin, more promiscuous than ever: A review of G3BP. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 48: 1065-1077.
  4. Langenau, D.M., Ferrando, A.A., Traver, D., Kutok, J.L., Hezel, J.P., Kanki, J.P., Zon, L.I., Look, A.T., and Trede, N.S. 2004. In vivo tracking of T cell development, ablation, and engraft- ment in transgenic zebrafish. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 101: 7369-7374.
  5. Langenau, D.M., Feng, H., Berghmans, S., Kanki, J.P., Kutok, J.L., and Look, A.T. 2005. Cre/lox-regulated transgenic ze- brafish model with conditional myc-induced T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 102: 6068- 6073.
  6. Ramaswamy, S., Tamayo, P., Rifkin, R., Mukherjee, S., Yeang, C.H., Angelo, M., Ladd, C., Reich, M., Latulippe, E., Me- sirov, J.P., et al. 2001. Multiclass cancer diagnosis using tu- mor gene expression signatures. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 98: 15149-15154.
  7. Schwienbacher, C., Sabbioni, S., Campi, M., Veronese, A., Ber- nardi, G., Menegatti, A., Hatada, I., Mukai, T., Ohashi, H., Barbanti-Brodano, G., et al. 1998. Transcriptional map of 170-kb region at chromosome 11p15.5: Identification and mutational analysis of the BWR1A gene reveals the presence of mutations in tumor samples. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 95: 3873-3878.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Langenau, D. M., Keefe, M. D., Storer, N. Y., Guyon, J. R., Kutok, J. L., Le, X., Goessling, W., Neuberg, D. S., Kunkel, L. M., & Zon, L. I.
Affiliations
  • Boston Children's Hospital (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US)
Venue
Genes & Development
Published
2007-05-17
Volume
21
Issue
11
Pages
1382-1395
ISSN
  • 0890-9369 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-5477
OpenAlex
W2125058702
Cited by
320
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 18
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genes & Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA103846)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM007753)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P30HD018655)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Cells and Metastasis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications
Keywords
embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma, RAS pathway activation, zebrafish tumor model, cancer stem cells, myogenesis, satellite cells, self-renewal, gene expression signatures, tumor heterogeneity
MeSH terms
Adenosine Deaminase, Animals, Cell Differentiation, Cell Transformation, Neoplastic, Cells, Cultured, DNA-Binding Proteins, Embryo, Nonmammalian, Humans, Kidney, Microinjections, Genes, ras, Biomarkers, Tumor, Zebrafish, RNA-Binding Proteins, In Situ Hybridization, Rhabdomyosarcoma, Embryonal, Muscle, Skeletal, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Gene Expression Profiling, Animals, Genetically Modified

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review