The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
R-loop-mediated genome instability in mRNA cleavage and polyadenylation mutants
Open accessAbstract
Genome instability via RNA:DNA hybrid-mediated R loops has been observed in mutants involved in various aspects of transcription and RNA processing. The prevalence of this mechanism among essential chromosome instability (CIN) genes remains unclear. In a secondary screen for increased Rad52 foci in CIN mutants, representing ∼25% of essential genes, we identified seven essential subunits of the mRNA cleavage and polyadenylation (mCP) machinery. Genome-wide analysis of fragile sites by chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) and microarray (ChIP–chip) of phosphorylated H2A in these mutants supported a transcription-dependent mechanism of DNA damage characteristic of R loops. In parallel, we directly detected increased RNA:DNA hybrid formation in mCP mutants and demonstrated that CIN is suppressed by expression of the R-loop-degrading enzyme RNaseH. To investigate the conservation of CIN in mCP mutants, we focused on FIP1L1, the human ortholog of yeast FIP1, a conserved mCP component that is part of an oncogenic fusion in eosinophilic leukemia. We found that truncation fusions of yeast FIP1 analogous to those in cancer cause loss of function and that siRNA knockdown of FIP1L1 in human cells increases DNA damage and chromosome breakage. Our findings illuminate how mCP maintains genome integrity by suppressing R-loop formation and suggest that this function may be relevant to certain human cancers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cytokinesis failure generating tetraploids promotes tumorigenesis in p53-null cells
Fujiwara, T., Bandi, M., Nitta, M., Ivanova, E. V., Bronson, R. T., & Pellman, D. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04217 · Cited by 1,067
Cited by
Causes and consequences of replication stress
Zeman, M. K., & Cimprich, K. A. (2014) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb2897 · Cited by 2,079
CX-5461 is a DNA G-quadruplex stabilizer with selective lethality in BRCA1/2 deficient tumours
Xu, H., Di Antonio, M., McKinney, S., Mathew, V., Ho, B., O’Neil, N. J., Santos, N. D., Silvester, J., Wei, V., Garcia, J., et al. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms14432 · Cited by 580
Self-citationSkourti-Stathaki, K., & Proudfoot, N. J. (2014) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.242990.114 · Cited by 532
Aguilera, A., & García-Muse, T. (2013) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genet-111212-133232 · Cited by 476
Cristini, A., Groh, M., Kristiansen, M. S., & Gromak, N. (2018) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2018.04.025 · Cited by 423
Metadata
- Authors
- Stirling, P. C., Chan, Y. A., Minaker, S. W., Aristizabal, M. J., Barrett, I., Sipahimalani, P., Kobor, M. S., & Hieter, P.
- Venue
- Genes & Development
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 2012-01-15
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 163-175
- ISSN
- 0890-9369 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-5477
- OpenAlex
- W2127598257
- Cited by
- 225
- References
- 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: R-loop-mediated genome instability in mRNA cleavage and polyadenylation mutants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/gad.179721.111
- The paper
- Stirling, P. C., Chan, Y. A., Minaker, S. W., Aristizabal, M. J., Barrett, I., Sipahimalani, P., Kobor, M. S., & Hieter, P. (2012). R-loop-mediated genome instability in mRNA cleavage and polyadenylation mutants. Genes & Development. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.179721.111
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.