Cited by 213RNA Research and SplicingGenetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

The splicing regulator Rbfox2 is required for both cerebellar development and mature motor function

Open access
Gehman, Lauren T., Meera, Pratap, Stoilov, Peter, Shiue, Lily, O'Brien, Janelle E., Meisler, Miriam H., Ares, Manuel, Otis, Thomas S. +1 more·2012·Genes & Development

Abstract

The Rbfox proteins (Rbfox1, Rbfox2, and Rbfox3) regulate the alternative splicing of many important neuronal transcripts and have been implicated in a variety of neurological disorders. However, their roles in brain development and function are not well understood, in part due to redundancy in their activities. Here we show that, unlike Rbfox1 deletion, the CNS-specific deletion of Rbfox2 disrupts cerebellar development. Genome-wide analysis of Rbfox2 −/− brain RNA identifies numerous splicing changes altering proteins important both for brain development and mature neuronal function. To separate developmental defects from alterations in the physiology of mature cells, Rbfox1 and Rbfox2 were deleted from mature Purkinje cells, resulting in highly irregular firing. Notably, the Scn8a mRNA encoding the Na v 1.6 sodium channel, a key mediator of Purkinje cell pacemaking, is improperly spliced in RbFox2 and Rbfox1 mutant brains, leading to highly reduced protein expression. Thus, Rbfox2 protein controls a post-transcriptional program required for proper brain development. Rbfox2 is subsequently required with Rbfox1 to maintain mature neuronal physiology, specifically Purkinje cell pacemaking, through their shared control of sodium channel transcript splicing.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/gad.182477.111

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Different Rbfox family members have highly similar protein sequences, especially in the RRM-type RBD (≥94% amino acid identity), and are expected to bind and regulate largely overlapping transcript sets.

    “Since different Rbfox family members have highly similar protein sequences, especially in their RNA-recognition motif (RRM)-type RNA-binding domain (RBD; ≥94% amino acid identity), they are expected to bind and regulate largely overlapping sets of transcripts (Gallagher et al., 2010; Gehman et al., 2012).”
  • WT versus Rbfox1 or Rbfox2 KO brain exon-junction microarray studies identified only 20 and 29 Rbfox-dependent exons, respectively.

    “Comparison of wild type (WT) versus Rbfox1 or Rbfox2 KO brains using exon-junction microarrays has identified multiple Rbfox-dependent exons (Gehman et al., 2012; Gehman et al., 2011). However, the number of exons identified using this approach is quite small (20 and 29 exons, respectively)”
  • CNS depletion of Rbfox2 causes cerebellar developmental defects.

    “CNS depletion of Rbfox2 results in defects in cerebellar development (Gehman et al., 2012).”
  • Previous efforts lacked a genome-wide, high-resolution map of in vivo Rbfox interaction sites in the brain.

    “An important piece of information missing in previous efforts toward this aim [e.g., (Fogel et al., 2012; Gehman et al., 2012; Gehman et al., 2011; Ray et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2008)] is a genome-wide, high-resolution map ofin vivo Rbfox interaction sites in the brain.”
  • Together with neuro-developmental defects seen in cell cultures, animal models, and human patients with disrupted Rbfox proteins, this provides a compelling case that Rbfox proteins play critical roles in driving the global dynamic change of the developmental splicing-regulatory program.

    “Combined with neuro-developmental defects observed in cell cultures (Kim et al., 2013), animal models (Gehman et al., 2012; Gehman et al., 2011; Kim et al., 2013), and human patients (Bhalla et al., 2004) where Rbfox proteins are disrupted, this presents a compelling case for Rbfox proteins playing critical roles in driving the global dynamic change of the developmentalsplicing-regulatory program.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 74 · Cited by 213

Authors
Gehman, L. T., Meera, P., Stoilov, P., Shiue, L., O'Brien, J. E., Meisler, M. H., Ares, M., Otis, T. S., & Black, D. L.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • West Virginia University (US)
  • University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Venue
Genes & Development
Published
2012-02-22
Volume
26
Issue
5
Pages
445-460
ISSN
  • 0890-9369 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-5477
OpenAlex
W2170820784
Cited by
213
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Genes & Development (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • McKnight Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health
  • U.S. Public Health Service (R01 86429)
  • Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM007544, R01GM084317, R01GM049369, R01GM040478, R01GM049662)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
RBFOX2, RBFOX1, NeuN, alternative splicing, cerebellar development, Purkinje cells, SCN8A, post-transcriptional regulation, brain development, motor function
MeSH terms
RNA Splicing Factors, Animals, Cerebellum, Motor Neurons, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Purkinje Cells, RNA Splicing, Sodium Channels, RNA-Binding Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Mice, Gene Knockout Techniques, NAV1.6 Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review