Cited by 30Plant Molecular Biology ResearchEpigenetics and DNA MethylationChromosomal and Genetic Variations

Enzymatic reactions of AGO4 in RNA-directed DNA methylation: siRNA duplex loading, passenger strand elimination, target RNA slicing, and sliced target retention

Open access
Wang, Feng, Huang, Hsiao-Yun, Huang, Jie, Singh, Jasleen, Pikaard, Craig S.·2023·Genes & Development

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

RNA-directed DNA methylation in plants is guided by 24-nt siRNAs generated in parallel with 23-nt RNAs of unknown function. We show that 23-nt RNAs function as passenger strands during 24-nt siRNA incorporation into AGO4. The 23-nt RNAs are then sliced into 11- and 12-nt fragments, with 12-nt fragments remaining associated with AGO4. Slicing recapitulated with recombinant AGO4 and synthetic RNAs reveals that siRNAs of 21–24 nt, with any 5′-terminal nucleotide, can guide slicing, with sliced RNAs then retained by AGO4. In vivo, RdDM target locus RNAs that copurify with AGO4 also display a sequence signature of slicing. Comparing plants expressing slicing-competent versus slicing-defective AGO4 shows that slicing elevates cytosine methylation levels at virtually all RdDM loci. We propose that siRNA passenger strand elimination and AGO4 tethering to sliced target RNAs are distinct modes by which AGO4 slicing enhances RNA-directed DNA methylation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/gad.350240.122

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, F., Huang, H.-Y., Huang, J., Singh, J., & Pikaard, C. S.
Affiliations
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
  • Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Corresponding author
Pikaard, Craig S.
Venue
Genes & Development
Published
2023-02-01
Volume
37
Issue
3-4
Pages
103-118
ISSN
  • 0890-9369 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-5477
OpenAlex
W4319304745
Cited by
30
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Genes & Development (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (GM077590)
  • Carlos O. Miller graduate fellowship
  • Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
Keywords
RNA-directed DNA methylation, AGO4, 24-nt siRNAs, cytosine methylation, plant epigenetics
MeSH terms
Arabidopsis, RNA, Plant, DNA Methylation, Gene Silencing, Arabidopsis Proteins, RNA, Small Interfering, Argonaute Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review