The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The SAGA acetyltransferase module is required for the maintenance of MAF and MYC oncogenic gene expression programs in multiple myeloma
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Despite recent advances in therapeutic treatments, multiple myeloma (MM) remains an incurable malignancy. Epigenetic factors contribute to the initiation, progression, relapse, and clonal heterogeneity in MM, but our knowledge on epigenetic mechanisms underlying MM development is far from complete. The SAGA complex serves as a coactivator in transcription and catalyzes acetylation and deubiquitylation. Analyses of data sets in the Cancer Dependency Map Project revealed that many SAGA components are selective dependencies in MM. To define SAGA-specific functions, we focused on ADA2B, the only subunit in the lysine acetyltransferase (KAT) module that specifically functions in SAGA. Integration of RNA sequencing (RNA-seq), assay for transposase-accessible chromatin with sequencing (ATAC-seq), and cleavage under targets and release using nuclease assay (CUT&RUN) results identified pathways directly regulated by ADA2B including MTORC1 signaling and oncogenic programs driven by MYC, E2F, and MM-specific MAF. We discovered that ADA2B is recruited to MAF and MYC gene targets, and that MAF shares a majority of its targets with MYC in MM cells. Furthermore, we found that the SANT domain of ADA2B is required for interaction with both GCN5 and PCAF acetyltransferases, incorporation into SAGA, and ADA2B protein stability. Our findings uncover previously unknown SAGA KAT module-dependent mechanisms controlling MM cell growth, revealing a vulnerability that might be exploited for future development of MM therapy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Direct promoter repression by BCL11A controls the fetal to adult hemoglobin switch
Liu, N., Hargreaves, V. V., Zhu, Q., Kurland, J. V., Hong, J., Kim, W., Sher, F., Macias-Trevino, C., Rogers, J. M., Kurita, R., et al. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.03.016 · Cited by 478
Arede, L., Foerner, E., Wind, S., Kulkarni, R., Domingues, A. F., Giotopoulos, G., Kleinwaechter, S., Mollenhauer-Starkl, M., Davison, H., Chandru, A., et al. (2022) · Blood Advances · doi:10.1182/bloodadvances.2020002842 · Cited by 25
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 73
- 10.1038/s41467-021-25704-2 · DOI
- 10.3390/epigenomes2030016 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.semcancer.2017.09.007 · DOI
- 10.1034/j.1600-065X.2003.00052.x · DOI
- 10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00634-2 · DOI
- 10.1038/nrm1314 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.92.14.6364 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81063-6 · DOI
- 10.1186/s13072-021-00402-x · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M113.458737 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.biocel.2014.10.024 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2021.12.004 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ccr.2008.01.007 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2020.194608 · DOI
- 10.18632/oncotarget.27226 · DOI
- 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-20-2379 · DOI
- 10.3389/fonc.2020.611690 · DOI
- 10.1186/s12935-023-02995-7 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.12.016 · DOI
- 10.1128/MCB.00315-08 · DOI
- 10.1101/gad.11.13.1640 · DOI
- 10.1128/MCB.01599-08 · DOI
- 10.1038/sj.leu.2404253 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-019-12489-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 2019, PGK1-mediated cancer progression and drug resistance, Am J Cancer Res, 9, 2280
- 10.1038/bcj.2013.67 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41594-021-00682-7 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bbcan.2021.188556 · DOI
- 10.1101/gad.255109.114 · DOI
- 10.1101/gad.350736.123 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1535-6108(04)00019-4 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M402403200 · DOI
- 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023009772 · DOI
- 10.18632/genesandcancer.201 · DOI
- 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601152 · DOI
- 10.1128/MCB.23.9.3305-3319.2003 · DOI
- 10.2174/13816128113199990638 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2012.08.026 · DOI
- 10.18632/oncotarget.18765 · DOI
- 10.1186/s13578-016-0114-6 · DOI
- 10.1126/sciadv.adm9449 · DOI
- 10.7554/eLife.46314 · DOI
- 10.1155/2020/8291036 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/25.15.2953 · DOI
- 10.1128/MCB.23.1.306-321.2003 · DOI
- 2019, Repression of GCN5 expression or activity attenuates c-MYC expression in non-small cell lung cancer, Am J Cancer Res, 9, 1830
- 10.3389/fonc.2022.979569 · DOI
- 10.1182/blood-2010-06-292243 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.canlet.2020.09.017 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-021-21898-7 · DOI
- 10.1128/MCB.24.24.10826-10834.2004 · DOI
- 10.3892/etm.2023.11973 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M115.668533 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41375-020-0785-1 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.pan.2022.03.002 · DOI
- 10.1038/nsmb.1397 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1805343115 · DOI
- 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-0579 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.09.079 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gkab1061 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1074/jbc.M806936200 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41598-018-37699-w · DOI
- 10.3389/fonc.2020.560487 · DOI
- 10.1038/79973 · DOI
- 10.1182/blood.2020005199 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.97.21.11303 · DOI
- 10.1002/hep.28541 · DOI
- 10.3727/105221615X14399878166230 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0604129103 · DOI
- 10.1182/blood-2005-11-013458 · DOI
- 10.1182/blood-2006-07-037077 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41419-020-2457-5 · DOI
- 10.1186/s13578-020-00396-1 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, Y.-J. C., Bhaskara, G. B., Lu, Y., Lin, K., & Dent, S. Y. R.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Chen, Ying-Jiun C.
- Venue
- Genes & Development
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 2024-08-01
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 15-16
- Pages
- 738-754
- ISSN
- 0890-9369 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-5477
- PMC
- PMC11444170
- OpenAlex
- W4401794250
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc
- Locations
- Genes & Development (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Digital Commons-TMC (Texas Medical Center) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Scholar Fellowship Award
- Center for Cancer Epigenetics at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
- National Institutes of Health (R35 GM131678, 1S10OD024977-01)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer
- Keywords
- SAGA complex, multiple myeloma, MAF, c-Myc, epigenetic regulation, mTORC1 signaling, E2F transcription factors, SANT domain, GCN5, PCAF, protein stability, transcriptional coactivator, therapeutic vulnerabilities
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review