The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A central role for chromosome breakage in gene amplification, deletion formation, and amplicon integration.
Open accessAbstract
A CHO cell line with a single copy of the DHFR locus on chromosome Z2 was used to analyze the structure of the amplification target and products subsequent to the initial amplification event. Dramatic diversity in the number and cytogenetic characteristics of DHFR amplicons was observed as soon as eight to nine cell doublings following the initial event. Two amplicon classes were noted at this early time: Small extrachromosomal elements and closely spaced chromosomal amplicons were detected in 30-40% of metaphases in six of nine clones, whereas three of nine clones contained huge amplicons spanning greater than 50 megabases. In contrast, the incidence of metaphases containing extrachromosomal amplicons fell to 1-2% in cells analyzed at 30-35 cell doublings, and most amplicons localized to rearranged or broken derivatives of chromosome Z2 at this time. Breakage of the Z2 chromosome near the DHFR gene, and deletion of the DHFR gene and flanking DNA was also observed in cells that had undergone the amplification process. To account for these diverse cytogenetic and molecular consequences of gene amplification, we propose that chromosome breakage plays a central role in the amplification process by (1) generating intermediates that are initially acentric and lead to copy number increase primarily by unequal segregation, (2) creating atelomeric ends that are either incompletely replicated or resected by exonucleases to generate deletions, and (3) producing recombinogenic ends that provide preferred sites for amplicon relocalization.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Principles of cancer therapy: oncogene and non-oncogene addiction
Luo, J., Solimini, N. L., & Elledge, S. J. (2009) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.02.024 · Cited by 1,765
Extrachromosomal oncogene amplification drives tumour evolution and genetic heterogeneity
Turner, K. M., Deshpande, V., Beyter, D., Koga, T., Rusert, J., Lee, C., Li, B., Arden, K., Ren, B., Nathanson, D. A., et al. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature21356 · Cited by 847
Self-citationTelomeres and telomerase in cancer
Artandi, S. E., & DePinho, R. A. (2010) · Carcinogenesis · doi:10.1093/carcin/bgp268 · Cited by 823
Defects in a cell cycle checkpoint may be responsible for the genomic instability of cancer cells
Hartwell, L. (1992) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(92)90586-2 · Cited by 770
Connecting Chromosomes, Crisis, and Cancer
Maser, R. S., & DePinho, R. A. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.297.5581.565 · Cited by 561
Metadata
- Authors
- Windle, B., Draper, B. W., Yin, Y. X., O'Gorman, S., & Wahl, G. M.
- Venue
- Genes & Development
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 1991-02
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 160-174
- ISSN
- 0890-9369 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-5477
- OpenAlex
- W1976543436
- Cited by
- 242
- References
- 0
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A central role for chromosome breakage in gene amplification, deletion formation, and amplicon integration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/gad.5.2.160
- The paper
- Windle, B., Draper, B. W., Yin, Y. X., O'Gorman, S., & Wahl, G. M. (1991). A central role for chromosome breakage in gene amplification, deletion formation, and amplicon integration. Genes & Development. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.5.2.160
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.