Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 847

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Extrachromosomal oncogene amplification drives tumour evolution and genetic heterogeneity

Open access
Turner, Kristen M., Deshpande, Viraj, Beyter, Doruk, Koga, Tomoyuki, Rusert, Jessica, Lee, Catherine, Li, Bin, Arden, Karen, Ren, Bing, Nathanson, David A., Kornblum, Harley I., Taylor, Michael D., Kaushal, Sharmeela, Cavenee, Webster K., Wechsler-Reya, Robert, Furnari, Frank B., Vandenberg, Scott R., Rao, P. Nagesh, Wahl, Geoffrey M., Bafna, Vineet, Mischel, Paul S.·2017·Nature

Abstract

Human cells have twenty-three pairs of chromosomes. In cancer, however, genes can be amplified in chromosomes or in circular extrachromosomal DNA (ecDNA), although the frequency and functional importance of ecDNA are not understood. We performed whole-genome sequencing, structural modelling and cytogenetic analyses of 17 different cancer types, including analysis of the structure and function of chromosomes during metaphase of 2,572 dividing cells, and developed a software package called ECdetect to conduct unbiased, integrated ecDNA detection and analysis. Here we show that ecDNA was found in nearly half of human cancers; its frequency varied by tumour type, but it was almost never found in normal cells. Driver oncogenes were amplified most commonly in ecDNA, thereby increasing transcript level. Mathematical modelling predicted that ecDNA amplification would increase oncogene copy number and intratumoural heterogeneity more effectively than chromosomal amplification. We validated these predictions by quantitative analyses of cancer samples. The results presented here suggest that ecDNA contributes to accelerated evolution in cancer.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature21356

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 33 references

Cited by

See all 847

Metadata

Authors
Turner, K. M., Deshpande, V., Beyter, D., Koga, T., Rusert, J., Lee, C., Li, B., Arden, K., Ren, B., Nathanson, D. A., Kornblum, H. I., Taylor, M. D., Kaushal, S., Cavenee, W. K., Wechsler-Reya, R., Furnari, F. B., Vandenberg, S. R., Rao, P. N., Wahl, G. M., Bafna, V., & Mischel, P. S.
Venue
Nature
Published
2017-02-08
Volume
543
Issue
7643
Pages
122-125
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2587686129
Cited by
847
References
33
FWCI
31.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Extrachromosomal oncogene amplification drives tumour evolution and genetic heterogeneity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature21356
The paper
Turner, K. M., Deshpande, V., Beyter, D., Koga, T., Rusert, J., Lee, C., Li, B., Arden, K., Ren, B., Nathanson, D. A., Kornblum, H. I., Taylor, M. D., Kaushal, S., Cavenee, W. K., Wechsler-Reya, R., Furnari, F. B., Vandenberg, S. R., Rao, P. N., Wahl, G. M., . . . Mischel, P. S. (2017). Extrachromosomal oncogene amplification drives tumour evolution and genetic heterogeneity. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21356

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.