The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Properties and localization of DNA methyltransferase in preimplantation mouse embryos: implications for genomic imprinting.
Open accessAbstract
Preimplantation mouse embryos contain very high levels of DNA methyltransferase activity. We show here that the form of DNA methyltransferase (DNA MTase) in early embryos differs from the form found in other cells and tissues by a slightly higher mobility on gel electrophoresis. Levels of DNA MTase were found to be very high throughout preimplantation development even though levels of 5-methylcytosine (m5C) in nuclear DNA are known to undergo a substantial decline in the same period. Confocal laser scanning microscopy of mouse embryos stained with DNA MTase-specific antibodies showed striking developmentally regulated changes in the distribution of DNA MTase. From the oocyte stage to the four-cell-stage, most DNA MTase was concentrated in peripheral cytoplasm, and nuclei did not contain detectable DNA MTase. In four- and eight-cell embryos, DNA MTase was seen in cytoplasmic granules; and in eight-cell embryos, DNA MTase was also present in large amounts in nuclei. Nuclei of blastocysts stained only faintly, whereas the cytoplasmic granules remained prominent. Paradoxically, DNA MTase was found to be at its highest levels in nuclei at a developmental stage where levels of m5C in DNA are decreasing most rapidly. Changes in methylation patterns in preimplantation embryos are therefore proposed to be under the control of unidentified regulatory factors rather than DNA MTase itself; these regulatory factors could be members of the group that contains the products of the Ssm-1 and Imp-1 genes, which are involved in the regulation of genomic imprinting.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Targeted mutation of the DNA methyltransferase gene results in embryonic lethality
Li, E., Bestor, T. H., & Jaenisch, R. (1992) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(92)90611-f · Cited by 3,984
Self-citation
Cited by
Linking DNA methylation and histone modification: patterns and paradigms
Cedar, H., & Bergman, Y. (2009) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2540 · Cited by 2,267
Differential Effects of Culture on Imprinted H19 Expression in the Preimplantation Mouse Embryo1
Doherty, A. S., Mann, M. R. W., Tremblay, K. D., Bartolomei, M. S., & Schultz, R. M. (2000) · Biology of Reproduction · doi:10.1095/biolreprod62.6.1526 · Cited by 722
Lane, N., Dean, W., Erhardt, S., Hajkova, P., Surani, A., Walter, J., & Reik, W. (2003) · genesis · doi:10.1002/gene.10168 · Cited by 667
Regulation and function of DNA methylation in plants and animals
He, X.-J., Chen, T., & Zhu, J.-K. (2011) · Cell Research · doi:10.1038/cr.2011.23 · Cited by 555
DNA methylation and chromatin – unraveling the tangled web
Robertson, K. D. (2002) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1205609 · Cited by 471
Metadata
- Authors
- Carlson, L. L., Page, A. W., & Bestor, T. H.
- Venue
- Genes & Development
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 1992-12-01
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 12b
- Pages
- 2536-2541
- ISSN
- 0890-9369 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2162641053
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Properties and localization of DNA methyltransferase in preimplantation mouse embryos: implications for genomic imprinting. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/gad.6.12b.2536
- The paper
- Carlson, L. L., Page, A. W., & Bestor, T. H. (1992). Properties and localization of DNA methyltransferase in preimplantation mouse embryos: implications for genomic imprinting. Genes & Development. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.6.12b.2536
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.