Cited by 113Developmental Biology and Gene RegulationAxon Guidance and Neuronal SignalingNeurobiology and Insect Physiology Research

Establishment of ventral cell fates in the Drosophila embryonic ectoderm requires DER, the EGF receptor homolog.

Open access
Raz, E, Shilo, B Z·1993·Genes & Development

Abstract

The embryonic ectoderm in Drosophila displays a highly organized arrangement of specific structures along the dorsal-ventral axis. To establish this characteristic design, cells must receive instructive cues regarding their position. We present evidence that during stages 8-9 of embryonic development, the Drosophila EGF receptor homolog (DER) is essential for determining the identity of cells within the ventral ectoderm. In the absence of DER activity at this phase, alterations in cell fate are observed: Ventral cells acquire more dorsal fates, as visualized by the expression profile of specific markers. The ventralizing effect of DER appears to function later than that of the dorsalizing dpp pathway, and the spatial overlap between them is minimal. A model for the determination of cell fates along the dorsal-ventral axis involving the two pathways is presented. Some aspects of the mutant ectodermal and CNS phenotypes of the DER locus (faint little ball, flb) resemble the phenotype of mutations from the spitz group. Synergistic interactions between flb and spitz or Star mutations suggest that these genes participate in a common signaling pathway.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/gad.7.10.1937

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Ashbumer, M. 1989. Drosophila: A laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York.
  2. Campos-Ortega, J.A. and V. Hartenstein. 1985. The embryonic development of Drosophila melanogaster. Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany.
  3. Wieschaus, E. and C. Nfisslein-Volhard. 1986. Looking at em- bryos. In Drosophila, a practical approach (ed. D.B. Roberts), pp. 199-227, IRL press, Oxford, England.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Raz, E., & Shilo, B. Z.
Affiliations
Weizmann Institute of Science (IL)
Venue
Genes & Development
Published
1993-10
Volume
7
Issue
10
Pages
1937-1948
ISSN
  • 0890-9369 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-5477
OpenAlex
W2102722477
Cited by
113
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genes & Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Minerva Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
Keywords
cell fate determination, dorsal-ventral axis, ventralization, Dpp signaling, embryonic development
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Communication, Drosophila, Ectoderm, Models, Biological, Morphogenesis, Protein Kinases, Time Factors, Genes, Insect, Genes, Reporter, Receptors, Invertebrate Peptide, Drosophila Proteins, ErbB Receptors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review