Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 460

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The languages of bacteria

Open access
Schauder, Stephan, Bassler, Bonnie L.·2001·Genes & Development

Abstract

Bacteria communicate with one another using chemical signaling molecules as words. Specifically, they release, detect, and respond to the accumulation of these molecules, which are called autoinducers. Detection of autoinducers allows bacteria to distinguish between low and high cell population density, and to control gene expression in response to changes in cell number. This process, termed quorum sensing, allows a population of bacteria to coordinately control the gene expression of the entire community. Quorum sensing confuses the distinction between prokaryotes and eukaryotes because it allows bacteria to behave as multicellular organisms, and to reap benefits that would be unattainable to them as individuals. Many bacterial behaviors are regulated by quorum sensing, including symbiosis, virulence, antibiotic production, and biofilm formation. Recent studies show that highly specific as well as universal quorum sensing languages exist which enable bacteria to communicate within and between species. Finally, both prokaryotic and eukaryotic mechanisms that interfere with bacterial quorum sensing have evolved. Specifically, the secretion of enzymes that destroy the autoinducers, and the production of autoinducer antagonists, are used by competitor bacteria and susceptible eukaryotic hosts to render quorum sensing bacteria mute and deaf, respectively. Analogous synthetic strategies are now being explored for the development of novel antimicrobial therapies. Bacteria in communities convey their presence to one another by releasing and responding to the accumulation of chemical signaling molecules called autoinducers. This process of intercellular communication, called quorum sensing, was first described in the bioluminescent marine bacterium Vibrio fischeri (Hastings and Nealson 1977; Nealson and Hastings 1979). V. fischeri lives in symbiotic associations with a number of marine animal hosts. In these partnerships, the host uses the light produced by V. fischeri for specific purposes such as attracting prey, avoiding predators, or finding a mate. In exchange for the light it provides, V. fischeri obtains a nutrient-rich environment in which to reside (Ruby 1996; Visick and McFall-Ngai 2000). A luciferase enzyme complex is responsible for light production in V. fischeri. Bioluminescence only occurs when V. fischeri is at high cell number, and this process is controlled by quorum sensing. Specifically, the production and accumulation of, and the response to, a minimum threshold concentration of an acylated homoserine lactone (HSL) autoinducer regulates density-dependent light production in V. fischeri, and enables V. fischeri to emit light only inside the specialized light organ of the host but not when free-living in the ocean. The reason for this is twofold. First, only under the nutrient-rich conditions of the light organ can V. fischeri grow to high population densities, and second, trapping of the diffusible autoinducer molecule in the light organ with the bacterial cells allows it to accumulate to a sufficient concentration that V. fischeri can detect it. Engebrecht and Silverman discovered the regulatory circuit controlling quorum sensing in V. fischeri (Engebrecht et al. 1983; Engebrecht and Silverman 1984, 1987). They showed that two regulatory components are required for the process. The LuxI protein is responsible for production of the HSL autoinducer, and the LuxR protein is responsible for binding the HSL autoinducer and activating transcription of the luciferase structural operon at high cell density (Engebrecht et al. 1983; Engebrecht and Silverman 1984). They showed that, as an autoinducer-producing population of V. fischeri cells grows, the concentration of autoinducer increases as a function of increasing cell-population density. When the autoinducer concentration reaches the micromolar range, it can interact with the LuxR protein, and the LuxR-autoinducer complex binds the luciferase promoter to activate transcription. Therefore, this quorum sensing circuit allows light production to be tightly correlated with the cell population density. For over 10 years the V. fischeri LuxI/LuxR signal–response system was considered a curious, but isolated, example of bacterial communication that had presumably evolved for a specific purpose required for the colonization of a symbiotic host. However, we now understand that most bac1Corresponding author. E-MAIL bbassler@molbio.princeton.edu; FAX (609) 258–6175. Article and publication are at http://www.genesdev.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/ gad.899601.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/gad.899601

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 460

Metadata

Authors
Schauder, S., & Bassler, B. L.
Venue
Genes & Development
Published
2001-06-15
Volume
15
Issue
12
Pages
1468-1480
ISSN
  • 0890-9369 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-5477
OpenAlex
W2145166342
Cited by
460
References
1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
diamond

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The languages of bacteria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/gad.899601
The paper
Schauder, S., & Bassler, B. L. (2001). The languages of bacteria. Genes & Development. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.899601

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.