The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Oct4 distribution and level in mouse clones: consequences for pluripotency
Open accessAbstract
Somatic cell clones often fail at a developmental stage coincident with commencement of differentiation. The transcription factor Oct4 is expressed during cleavage stages and is essential for the differentiation of the blastocyst. Oct4 expression becomes restricted to the inner cell mass and epiblast. After gastrulation Oct4 is active only in germ cells and is silent in somatic cells. Here,Oct4 and an Oct4–GFP transgene were used as markers for which gene reprogramming could be directly related to the developmental potential of somatic cell clones. Cumulus cell clones initiated Oct4 expression at the correct stage but showed an incorrect spatial expression in the majority of blastocysts. The ability of clones to form outgrowths was reduced, and the outgrowths had low or even undetectable levels of Oct4 RNA or GFP. The quality of GFP signals in blastocysts correlated with the ability to generate outgrowths that maintain GFP expression and the frequency of embryonic stem (ES) cell derivation. Abnormal Oct4 expression in clones is either directly or indirectly caused by reprogramming errors and is indicative of a general failure to reset the genetic program. The abnormal Oct4 expression may be associated with aberrant expression of other crucial developmental genes, leading to abnormalities at various embryonic stages. Regardless of other genes, the variations observed in Oct4 levels alone account for the majority of failures currently observed for somatic cell cloning.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Jaenisch, R., & Bird, A. (2003) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1089 · Cited by 6,325
Stability and flexibility of epigenetic gene regulation in mammalian development
Reik, W. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05918 · Cited by 1,963
Chromatin modification and epigenetic reprogramming in mammalian development
Li, E. (2002) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg887 · Cited by 1,900
Buganim, Y., Faddah, D. A., Cheng, A. W., Itskovich, E., Markoulaki, S., Ganz, K., Klemm, S. L., van Oudenaarden, A., & Jaenisch, R. (2012) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.08.023 · Cited by 793
Hochedlinger, K., Yamada, Y., Beard, C., & Jaenisch, R. (2005) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2005.02.018 · Cited by 747
Metadata
- Authors
- Boiani, M., Eckardt, S., Schöler, H. R., & McLaughlin, K. J.
- Venue
- Genes & Development
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 2002-05-15
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1209-1219
- ISSN
- 0890-9369 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-5477
- OpenAlex
- W2166649689
- Cited by
- 516
- References
- 0
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Oct4 distribution and level in mouse clones: consequences for pluripotency. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/gad.966002
- The paper
- Boiani, M., Eckardt, S., Schöler, H. R., & McLaughlin, K. J. (2002). Oct4 distribution and level in mouse clones: consequences for pluripotency. Genes & Development. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.966002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.