The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Single-Cell Expression Analyses during Cellular Reprogramming Reveal an Early Stochastic and a Late Hierarchic Phase
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cellular reprogramming to pluripotency by forced expression of the Yamanaka factors occurs through global remodeling of epigenetic marks.
“Cellular reprogramming to pluripotency by forced expression of the Yamanaka factors (Oct4, Sox2, Klf4, and c-Myc [OSKM]) occurs through the global remodeling of epigenetic marks”
From In Vivo Amelioration of Age-Associated Hallmarks by Partial Reprogramming. (2016) · cites this paper as Buganim et al., 2012
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Takahashi, K., & Yamanaka, S. (2006) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.024 · Cited by 26,673
Imaging individual mRNA molecules using multiple singly labeled probes
Raj, A., van den Bogaard, P., Rifkin, S. A., van Oudenaarden, A., & Tyagi, S. (2008) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.1253 · Cited by 2,028
Stability and flexibility of epigenetic gene regulation in mammalian development
Reik, W. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05918 · Cited by 1,963 · cited 1×
“Because reprogramming requires a vast number of epigenetic changes, we chose a group of ESC-associated chromatinremodeling genes and modification enzymes (Myst3, Kdm1, Hdac1, Dnmt1, Prmt7, Ctcf, Myst4, Dnmt3b, Ezh2, Bmi1) (Reik, 2007; Surani et al., 2007).”
Suppression of induced pluripotent stem cell generation by the p53–p21 pathway
Hong, H., Takahashi, K., Ichisaka, T., Aoi, T., Kanagawa, O., Nakagawa, M., Okita, K., & Yamanaka, S. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08235 · Cited by 1,301
Defining molecular cornerstones during fibroblast to iPS cell reprogramming in mouse
Stadtfeld, M., Maherali, N., Breault, D. T., & Hochedlinger, K. (2008) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2008.02.001 · Cited by 823
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 38
- Bhutani, 2010, Reprogramming towards pluripotency requires AID-dependent DNA demethylation, Nature, 463, 1042, 10.1038/nature08752 · DOI
- Boiani, 2005, Regulatory networks in embryo-derived pluripotent stem cells, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 6, 872, 10.1038/nrm1744 · DOI
- Boiani, 2002, Oct4 distribution and level in mouse clones: consequences for pluripotency, Genes Dev., 16, 1209, 10.1101/gad.966002 · DOI
- Brambrink, 2008, Sequential expression of pluripotency markers during direct reprogramming of mouse somatic cells, Cell Stem Cell, 2, 151, 10.1016/j.stem.2008.01.004 · DOI
- Dalerba, 2011, Single-cell dissection of transcriptional heterogeneity in human colon tumors, Nat. Biotechnol., 29, 1120, 10.1038/nbt.2038 · DOI
- Diehn, 2009, Association of reactive oxygen species levels and radioresistance in cancer stem cells, Nature, 458, 780, 10.1038/nature07733 · DOI · Paper page
- Egli, 2008, Mediators of reprogramming: transcription factors and transitions through mitosis, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 9, 505, 10.1038/nrm2439 · DOI
- Feng, 2009, Reprogramming of fibroblasts into induced pluripotent stem cells with orphan nuclear receptor Esrrb, Nat. Cell Biol., 11, 197, 10.1038/ncb1827 · DOI
- Guo, 2010, Resolution of cell fate decisions revealed by single-cell gene expression analysis from zygote to blastocyst, Dev. Cell, 18, 675, 10.1016/j.devcel.2010.02.012 · DOI
- Hanna, 2009, Direct cell reprogramming is a stochastic process amenable to acceleration, Nature, 462, 595, 10.1038/nature08592 · DOI · Paper page
- Hanna, 2010, Pluripotency and cellular reprogramming: facts, hypotheses, unresolved issues, Cell, 143, 508, 10.1016/j.cell.2010.10.008 · DOI
- Itzkovitz, 2012, Single-molecule transcript counting of stem-cell markers in the mouse intestine, Nat. Cell Biol., 14, 106, 10.1038/ncb2384 · DOI
- Jaenisch, 2008, Stem cells, the molecular circuitry of pluripotency and nuclear reprogramming, Cell, 132, 567, 10.1016/j.cell.2008.01.015 · DOI
- Koche, 2011, Reprogramming factor expression initiates widespread targeted chromatin remodeling, Cell Stem Cell, 8, 96, 10.1016/j.stem.2010.12.001 · DOI · Paper page
- Li, 2010, A mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition initiates and is required for the nuclear reprogramming of mouse fibroblasts, Cell Stem Cell, 7, 51, 10.1016/j.stem.2010.04.014 · DOI · Paper page
- Lin, 1991, Divergence measures based on the shannon entropy, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 37, 145, 10.1109/18.61115 · DOI
- Macfarlan, 2011, Endogenous retroviruses and neighboring genes are coordinately repressed by LSD1/KDM1A, Genes Dev., 25, 594, 10.1101/gad.2008511 · DOI
- Maherali, 2007, Directly reprogrammed fibroblasts show global epigenetic remodeling and widespread tissue contribution, Cell Stem Cell, 1, 55, 10.1016/j.stem.2007.05.014 · DOI · Paper page
- Mansour, 2012, The H3K27 demethylase Utx regulates somatic and germ cell epigenetic reprogramming, Nature, 488, 409, 10.1038/nature11272 · DOI
- Masui, 2007, Pluripotency governed by Sox2 via regulation of Oct3/4 expression in mouse embryonic stem cells, Nat. Cell Biol., 9, 625, 10.1038/ncb1589 · DOI
- Meissner, 2007, Direct reprogramming of genetically unmodified fibroblasts into pluripotent stem cells, Nat. Biotechnol., 25, 1177, 10.1038/nbt1335 · DOI
- Mikkelsen, 2008, Dissecting direct reprogramming through integrative genomic analysis, Nature, 454, 49, 10.1038/nature07056 · DOI
- Narsinh, 2011, Single cell transcriptional profiling reveals heterogeneity of human induced pluripotent stem cells, J. Clin. Invest., 121, 1217, 10.1172/JCI44635 · DOI
- Ng, 2011, The transcriptional and signalling networks of pluripotency, Nat. Cell Biol., 13, 490, 10.1038/ncb0511-490 · DOI
- Okita, 2007, Generation of germline-competent induced pluripotent stem cells, Nature, 448, 313, 10.1038/nature05934 · DOI
- Phillips, 2009, CTCF: master weaver of the genome, Cell, 137, 1194, 10.1016/j.cell.2009.06.001 · DOI
- Raj, 2010, Variability in gene expression underlies incomplete penetrance, Nature, 463, 913, 10.1038/nature08781 · DOI
- Ramalho-Santos, 2002, “Stemness”: transcriptional profiling of embryonic and adult stem cells, Science, 298, 597, 10.1126/science.1072530 · DOI
- Samavarchi-Tehrani, 2010, Functional genomics reveals a BMP-driven mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition in the initiation of somatic cell reprogramming, Cell Stem Cell, 7, 64, 10.1016/j.stem.2010.04.015 · DOI · Paper page
- Silva, 2009, Nanog is the gateway to the pluripotent ground state, Cell, 138, 722, 10.1016/j.cell.2009.07.039 · DOI · Paper page
- Smith, 2010, Dynamic single-cell imaging of direct reprogramming reveals an early specifying event, Nat. Biotechnol., 28, 521, 10.1038/nbt.1632 · DOI
- Surani, 2007, Genetic and epigenetic regulators of pluripotency, Cell, 128, 747, 10.1016/j.cell.2007.02.010 · DOI
- Tang, 2010, Tracing the derivation of embryonic stem cells from the inner cell mass by single-cell RNA-Seq analysis, Cell Stem Cell, 6, 468, 10.1016/j.stem.2010.03.015 · DOI
- Wernig, 2007, In vitro reprogramming of fibroblasts into a pluripotent ES-cell-like state, Nature, 448, 318, 10.1038/nature05944 · DOI
- Wernig, 2008, A drug-inducible transgenic system for direct reprogramming of multiple somatic cell types, Nat. Biotechnol., 26, 916, 10.1038/nbt1483 · DOI
- Yamanaka, 2009, Elite and stochastic models for induced pluripotent stem cell generation, Nature, 460, 49, 10.1038/nature08180 · DOI
- Zhang, 2006, Sall4 modulates embryonic stem cell pluripotency and early embryonic development by the transcriptional regulation of Pou5f1, Nat. Cell Biol., 8, 1114, 10.1038/ncb1481 · DOI · Paper page
- Zhao, 2009, iPS cells produce viable mice through tetraploid complementation, Nature, 461, 86, 10.1038/nature08267 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Trapnell, C., Cacchiarelli, D., Grimsby, J., Pokharel, P., Li, S., Morse, M., Lennon, N. J., Livak, K. J., Mikkelsen, T. S., & Rinn, J. L. (2014) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2859 · Cited by 7,314
Bayesian approach to single-cell differential expression analysis
Kharchenko, P. V., Silberstein, L., & Scadden, D. T. (2014) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2967 · Cited by 1,348
Intracellular α-ketoglutarate maintains the pluripotency of embryonic stem cells
Carey, B. W., Finley, L. W. S., Cross, J. R., Allis, C. D., & Thompson, C. B. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13981 · Cited by 1,007
In Vivo Amelioration of Age-Associated Hallmarks by Partial Reprogramming.
Ocampo, A., Reddy, P., Martinez-Redondo, P., Platero-Luengo, A., Hatanaka, F., Hishida, T., Li, M., Lam, D., Kurita, M., Beyret, E., et al. (2016) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.11.052 · Cited by 988
Single-cell RNA-seq: advances and future challenges
Saliba, A.-E., Westermann, A. J., Gorski, S. A., & Vogel, J. (2014) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gku555 · Cited by 847
A Molecular Roadmap of Reprogramming Somatic Cells into iPS Cells
Polo, J. M., Anderssen, E., Walsh, R. M., Schwarz, B. A., Nefzger, C. M., Lim, S. M., Borkent, M., Apostolou, E., Alaei, S., Cloutier, J., et al. (2012) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.11.039 · Cited by 861
Diffusion maps for high-dimensional single-cell analysis of differentiation data
Haghverdi, L., Buettner, F., & Theis, F. J. (2015) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btv325 · Cited by 649
Cooperative Binding of Transcription Factors Orchestrates Reprogramming
Chronis, C., Fiziev, P., Papp, B., Butz, S., Bonora, G., Sabri, S., Ernst, J., & Plath, K. (2017) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.12.016 · Cited by 555
Identification of cell types from single-cell transcriptomes using a novel clustering method
Xu, C., & Su, Z. (2015) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btv088 · Cited by 559
Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Meet Genome Editing
Hockemeyer, D., & Jaenisch, R. (2016) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2016.04.013 · Cited by 499
“…equally potent in reprogramming cells to a pluripotent state, providing valuable insights into the transcriptional pluripotency networks and how cells establish pluripotency (Buganim et al., 2012) (Apostolou and Hochedlinger, 2013; Park et al., 2008; Takahashi and Yamanaka, 2015; Yu et al., 2007).”
BackgroundSelf-citationLin28: Primal Regulator of Growth and Metabolism in Stem Cells
Shyh-Chang, N., & Daley, G. Q. (2013) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2013.03.005 · Cited by 458
Sasagawa, Y., Nikaido, I., Hayashi, T., Danno, H., Uno, K. D., Imai, T., & Ueda, H. R. (2013) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2013-14-4-r31 · Cited by 455
Defining an essential transcription factor program for naïve pluripotency
Dunn, S.-J., Martello, G., Yordanov, B., Emmott, S., & Smith, A. G. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1248882 · Cited by 370
Gao, Y., Chen, J., Li, K., Wu, T., Huang, B., Liu, W., Kou, X., Zhang, Y., Huang, H., Jiang, Y., et al. (2013) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2013.02.005 · Cited by 362
Spatial transcriptomic analysis of cryosectioned tissue samples with Geo-seq
Chen, J., Suo, S., Tam, P. P., Han, J.-D. J., Peng, G., & Jing, N. (2017) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2017.003 · Cited by 339
Defining midbrain dopaminergic neuron diversity by single-cell gene expression profiling
Poulin, J.-F., Zou, J., Drouin-Ouellet, J., Kim, K.-Y. A., Cicchetti, F., & Awatramani, R. B. (2014) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2014.10.008 · Cited by 352
Chromatin repressive complexes in stem cells, development, and cancer
Laugesen, A., & Helin, K. (2014) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2014.05.006 · Cited by 352
Aging increases cell-to-cell transcriptional variability upon immune stimulation
Martinez-Jimenez, C. P., Eling, N., Chen, H.-C., Vallejos, C. A., Kolodziejczyk, A. A., Connor, F., Stojic, L., Rayner, T. F., Stubbington, M. J. T., Teichmann, S. A., et al. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aah4115 · Cited by 339
Single-cell epigenomics: powerful new methods for understanding gene regulation and cell identity
Clark, S. J., Lee, H. J., Smallwood, S. A., Kelsey, G., & Reik, W. (2016) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-016-0944-x · Cited by 310
Bifurcation analysis of single-cell gene expression data reveals epigenetic landscape
Marco, E., Karp, R. L., Guo, G., Robson, P., Hart, A. H., Trippa, L., & Yuan, G.-C. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1408993111 · Cited by 268
Disentangling neural cell diversity using single-cell transcriptomics
Poulin, J.-F., Tasic, B., Hjerling-Leffler, J., Trimarchi, J. M., & Awatramani, R. (2016) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4366 · Cited by 293
Mapping gene regulatory networks from single-cell omics data
Fiers, M. W. E. J., Minnoye, L., Aibar, S., Bravo González-Blas, C., Kalender Atak, Z., & Aerts, S. (2018) · Briefings in Functional Genomics · doi:10.1093/bfgp/elx046 · Cited by 235
Cell-of-origin-specific 3D genome structure acquired during somatic cell reprogramming
Krijger, P. H. L., Di Stefano, B., de Wit, E., Limone, F., van Oevelen, C., de Laat, W., & Graf, T. (2016) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2016.01.007 · Cited by 217
Chen, S., & Mar, J. C. (2018) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-018-2217-z · Cited by 235
Single-cell transcriptome sequencing: recent advances and remaining challenges
Liu, S., & Trapnell, C. (2016) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.7223.1 · Cited by 230
Activation of the pluripotency factor OCT4 in smooth muscle cells is atheroprotective
Cherepanova, O. A., Gomez, D., Shankman, L. S., Swiatlowska, P., Williams, J., Sarmento, O. F., Alencar, G. F., Hess, D. L., Bevard, M. H., Greene, E. S., et al. (2016) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.4109 · Cited by 221
Chip in a lab: microfluidics for next generation life science research
Streets, A. M., & Huang, Y. (2013) · Biomicrofluidics · doi:10.1063/1.4789751 · Cited by 180
Mitotic binding of Esrrb marks key regulatory regions of the pluripotency network
Festuccia, N., Dubois, A., Vandormael-Pournin, S., Gallego Tejeda, E., Mouren, A., Bessonnard, S., Mueller, F., Proux, C., Cohen-Tannoudji, M., & Navarro, P. (2016) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb3418 · Cited by 158
Tracing dynamic changes of DNA methylation at single cell resolution
Stelzer, Y., Shivalila, C. S., Soldner, F., Markoulaki, S., & Jaenisch, R. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.08.046 · Cited by 141
Self-citationMolecular Obstacles to Clinical Translation of iPSCs
Tapia, N., & Schöler, H. R. (2016) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2016.06.017 · Cited by 141
Beagan, J. A., Gilgenast, T. G., Kim, J., Plona, Z., Norton, H. K., Hu, G., Hsu, S. C., Shields, E. J., Lyu, X., Apostolou, E., et al. (2016) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2016.04.004 · Cited by 134
Modeling Bi-modality Improves Characterization of Cell Cycle on Gene Expression in Single Cells
McDavid, A., Dennis, L., Danaher, P., Finak, G., Krouse, M., Wang, A., Webster, P., Beechem, J., & Gottardo, R. (2014) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003696 · Cited by 58
Rand, T. A., Sutou, K., Tanabe, K., Jeong, D., Nomura, M., Kitaoka, F., Tomoda, E., Narita, M., Nakamura, M., Nakamura, M., et al. (2018) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2018.03.057 · Cited by 37
Lineage marker synchrony in hematopoietic genealogies refutes the PU.1/GATA1 toggle switch paradigm
Strasser, M. K., Hoppe, P. S., Loeffler, D., Kokkaliaris, K. D., Schroeder, T., Theis, F. J., & Marr, C. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-05037-3 · Cited by 26
Paine, P. T., Rechsteiner, C., Morandini, F., Desdín-Micó, G., Mrabti, C., Parras, A., Haghani, A., Brooke, R., Horvath, S., Seluanov, A., et al. (2024) · Frontiers in Aging · doi:10.3389/fragi.2023.1323194 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Buganim, Y., Faddah, D. A., Cheng, A. W., Itskovich, E., Markoulaki, S., Ganz, K., Klemm, S. L., van Oudenaarden, A., & Jaenisch, R.
- Venue
- Cell
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-09
- Volume
- 150
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1209-1222
- ISSN
- 0092-8674
- PMC
- PMC3457656
- Cited by
- 793
- References
- 5
- Language
- en
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/open-access/userlicense/1.0/ (vor, 380 d)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-017 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-037 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-012 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-029 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-004 (stm-asf)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
