Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 430

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparative genome analysis of Salmonella Enteritidis PT4 and Salmonella Gallinarum 287/91 provides insights into evolutionary and host adaptation pathways

Open access
Thomson, Nicholas R., Clayton, Debra J., Windhorst, Daniel, Vernikos, Georgios, Davidson, Susanne, Churcher, Carol, Quail, Michael A., Stevens, Mark, Jones, Michael A., Watson, Michael, Barron, Andy, Layton, Abigail, Pickard, Derek, Kingsley, Robert A., Bignell, Alex, Clark, Louise, Harris, Barbara, Ormond, Doug, Abdellah, Zahra, Brooks, Karen, Cherevach, Inna, Chillingworth, Tracey, Woodward, John, Norberczak, Halina, Lord, Angela, Arrowsmith, Claire, Jagels, Kay, Moule, Sharon, Mungall, Karen, Sanders, Mandy, Whitehead, Sally, Chabalgoity, Jose A., Maskell, Duncan, Humphrey, Tom, Roberts, Mark, Barrow, Paul A., Dougan, Gordon, Parkhill, Julian·2008·Genome Research

Abstract

We have determined the complete genome sequences of a host-promiscuous Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis PT4 isolate P125109 and a chicken-restricted Salmonella enterica serovar Gallinarum isolate 287/91. Genome comparisons between these and other Salmonella isolates indicate that S. Gallinarum 287/91 is a recently evolved descendent of S. Enteritidis. Significantly, the genome of S. Gallinarum has undergone extensive degradation through deletion and pseudogene formation. Comparison of the pseudogenes in S. Gallinarum with those identified previously in other host-adapted bacteria reveals the loss of many common functional traits and provides insights into possible mechanisms of host and tissue adaptation. We propose that experimental analysis in chickens and mice of S. Enteritidis–harboring mutations in functional homologs of the pseudogenes present in S. Gallinarum could provide an experimentally tractable route toward unraveling the genetic basis of host adaptation in S. enterica.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/gr.077404.108

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 430

Metadata

Authors
Thomson, N. R., Clayton, D. J., Windhorst, D., Vernikos, G., Davidson, S., Churcher, C., Quail, M. A., Stevens, M., Jones, M. A., Watson, M., Barron, A., Layton, A., Pickard, D., Kingsley, R. A., Bignell, A., Clark, L., Harris, B., Ormond, D., Abdellah, Z., Brooks, K., Cherevach, I., Chillingworth, T., Woodward, J., Norberczak, H., Lord, A., Arrowsmith, C., Jagels, K., Moule, S., Mungall, K., Sanders, M., Whitehead, S., Chabalgoity, J. A., Maskell, D., Humphrey, T., Roberts, M., Barrow, P. A., Dougan, G., & Parkhill, J.
Venue
Genome Research
Published
2008-06-26
Volume
18
Issue
10
Pages
1624-1637
ISSN
1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2105537192
Cited by
430
References
2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative genome analysis of Salmonella Enteritidis PT4 and Salmonella Gallinarum 287/91 provides insights into evolutionary and host adaptation pathways. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/gr.077404.108
The paper
Thomson, N. R., Clayton, D. J., Windhorst, D., Vernikos, G., Davidson, S., Churcher, C., Quail, M. A., Stevens, M., Jones, M. A., Watson, M., Barron, A., Layton, A., Pickard, D., Kingsley, R. A., Bignell, A., Clark, L., Harris, B., Ormond, D., Abdellah, Z., . . . Parkhill, J. (2008). Comparative genome analysis of Salmonella Enteritidis PT4 and Salmonella Gallinarum 287/91 provides insights into evolutionary and host adaptation pathways. Genome Research. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.077404.108

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.