The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The consensus coding sequence (CCDS) project: Identifying a common protein-coding gene set for the human and mouse genomes
Open accessAbstract
Effective use of the human and mouse genomes requires reliable identification of genes and their products. Although multiple public resources provide annotation, different methods are used that can result in similar but not identical representation of genes, transcripts, and proteins. The collaborative consensus coding sequence (CCDS) project tracks identical protein annotations on the reference mouse and human genomes with a stable identifier (CCDS ID), and ensures that they are consistently represented on the NCBI, Ensembl, and UCSC Genome Browsers. Importantly, the project coordinates on manually reviewing inconsistent protein annotations between sites, as well as annotations for which new evidence suggests a revision is needed, to progressively converge on a complete protein-coding set for the human and mouse reference genomes, while maintaining a high standard of reliability and biological accuracy. To date, the project has identified 20,159 human and 17,707 mouse consensus coding regions from 17,052 human and 16,893 mouse genes. Three evaluation methods indicate that the entries in the CCDS set are highly likely to represent real proteins, more so than annotations from contributing groups not included in CCDS. The CCDS database thus centralizes the function of identifying well-supported, identically-annotated, protein-coding regions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The ENCODE Project Consortium (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05874 · Cited by 5,223
NCBI Reference Sequences: current status, policy and new initiatives
Pruitt, K. D., Tatusova, T., Klimke, W., & Maglott, D. R. (2009) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkn721 · Cited by 736 · cited 1×
“The sequence may differ at individual amino acids from associated RefSeq records (Pruitt et al. 2009) because the latter are often based on translations of independently generated mRNA sequences that may be selected to represent a different allele.”
BackgroundSelf-citationDistinguishing protein-coding and noncoding genes in the human genome
Clamp, M., Fry, B., Kamal, M., Xie, X., Cuff, J., Lin, M. F., Kellis, M., Lindblad-Toh, K., & Lander, E. S. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0709013104 · Cited by 624
Self-citation
Cited by
GENCODE: The reference human genome annotation for The ENCODE Project
Harrow, J., Frankish, A., Gonzalez, J. M., Tapanari, E., Diekhans, M., Kokocinski, F., Aken, B. L., Barrell, D., Zadissa, A., Searle, S., et al. (2012) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.135350.111 · Cited by 4,585
Self-citationSystematic Localization of Common Disease-Associated Variation in Regulatory DNA
Maurano, M. T., Humbert, R., Rynes, E., Thurman, R. E., Haugen, E., Wang, H., Reynolds, A. P., Sandstrom, R., Qu, H., Brody, J., et al. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1222794 · Cited by 3,716
Zerbino, D. R., Achuthan, P., Akanni, W., Amode, M. R., Barrell, D., Bhai, J., Billis, K., Cummins, C., Gall, A., Girón, C. G., et al. (2018) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkx1098 · Cited by 2,605
Self-citationInternational network of cancer genome projects
The International Cancer Genome Consortium (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08987 · Cited by 2,299
Exome sequencing identifies the cause of a mendelian disorder
Ng, S. B., Buckingham, K. J., Lee, C., Bigham, A. W., Tabor, H. K., Dent, K. M., Huff, C. D., Shannon, P. T., Jabs, E. W., Nickerson, D. A., et al. (2010) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.499 · Cited by 1,957
Metadata
- Authors
- Pruitt, K. D., Harrow, J., Harte, R. A., Wallin, C., Diekhans, M., Maglott, D. R., Searle, S., Farrell, C. M., Loveland, J. E., Ruef, B. J., Hart, E., Suner, M.-M., Landrum, M. J., Aken, B., Ayling, S., Baertsch, R., Fernandez-Banet, J., Cherry, J. L., Curwen, V., DiCuccio, M., Kellis, M., Lee, J., Lin, M. F., Schuster, M., Shkeda, A., Amid, C., Brown, G., Dukhanina, O., Frankish, A., Hart, J., Maidak, B. L., Mudge, J., Murphy, M. R., Murphy, T., Rajan, J., Rajput, B., Riddick, L. D., Snow, C., Steward, C., Webb, D., Weber, J. A., Wilming, L., Wu, W., Birney, E., Haussler, D., Hubbard, T., Ostell, J., Durbin, R., & Lipman, D.
- Venue
- Genome Research
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 2009-06-04
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1316-1323
- ISSN
- 1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2101735289
- Cited by
- 557
- References
- 3
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The consensus coding sequence (CCDS) project: Identifying a common protein-coding gene set for the human and mouse genomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/gr.080531.108
- The paper
- Pruitt, K. D., Harrow, J., Harte, R. A., Wallin, C., Diekhans, M., Maglott, D. R., Searle, S., Farrell, C. M., Loveland, J. E., Ruef, B. J., Hart, E., Suner, M.-M., Landrum, M. J., Aken, B., Ayling, S., Baertsch, R., Fernandez-Banet, J., Cherry, J. L., Curwen, V., . . . Lipman, D. (2009). The consensus coding sequence (CCDS) project: Identifying a common protein-coding gene set for the human and mouse genomes. Genome Research. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.080531.108
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
