The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Comparative Map of the Zebrafish Genome
Open accessAbstract
Zebrafish mutations define the functions of hundreds of essential genes in the vertebrate genome. To accelerate the molecular analysis of zebrafish mutations and to facilitate comparisons among the genomes of zebrafish and other vertebrates, we used a homozygous diploid meiotic mapping panel to localize polymorphisms in 691 previously unmapped genes and expressed sequence tags (ESTs). Together with earlier efforts, this work raises the total number of markers scored in the mapping panel to 2119, including 1503 genes and ESTs and 616 previously characterized simple-sequence length polymorphisms. Sequence analysis of zebrafish genes mapped in this study and in prior work identified putative human orthologs for 804 zebrafish genes and ESTs. Map comparisons revealed 139 new conserved syntenies, in which two or more genes are on the same chromosome in zebrafish and human. Although some conserved syntenies are quite large, there were changes in gene order within conserved groups, apparently reflecting the relatively frequent occurrence of inversions and other intrachromosomal rearrangements since the divergence of teleost and tetrapod ancestors. Comparative mapping also shows that there is not a one-to-one correspondence between zebrafish and human chromosomes. Mapping of duplicate gene pairs identified segments of 20 linkage groups that may have arisen during a genome duplication that occurred early in the evolution of teleosts after the divergence of teleost and mammalian ancestors. This comparative map will accelerate the molecular analysis of zebrafish mutations and enhance the understanding of the evolution of the vertebrate genome.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A molecular timescale for vertebrate evolution
Kumar, S., & Hedges, S. B. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/31927 · Cited by 1,936
Cited by
Jaillon, O., Aury, J.-M., Brunet, F., Petit, J.-L., Stange-Thomann, N., Mauceli, E., Bouneau, L., Fischer, C., Ozouf-Costaz, C., Bernot, A., et al. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03025 · Cited by 1,966
Zebrafish Comparative Genomics and the Origins of Vertebrate Chromosomes
Postlethwait, J. H., Woods, I. G., Ngo-Hazelett, P., Yan, Y.-L., Kelly, P. D., Chu, F., Huang, H., Hill-Force, A., & Talbot, W. S. (2000) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.164800 · Cited by 688
Self-citationKikuta, H., Laplante, M., Navratilova, P., Komisarczuk, A. Z., Engström, P. G., Fredman, D., Akalin, A., Caccamo, M., Sealy, I., Howe, K., et al. (2007) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.6086307 · Cited by 371
Wild Sex in Zebrafish: Loss of the Natural Sex Determinant in Domesticated Strains
Wilson, C. A., High, S. K., McCluskey, B. M., Amores, A., Yan, Y.-L., Titus, T. A., Anderson, J. L., Batzel, P., Carvan, M. J., Schartl, M., et al. (2014) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.114.169284 · Cited by 331
Chiang, E. F.-L., Pai, C.-I., Wyatt, M., Yan, Y.-L., Postlethwait, J., & Chung, B.-C. (2001) · Developmental Biology · doi:10.1006/dbio.2000.0129 · Cited by 320
Metadata
- Authors
- Woods, I. G.
- Venue
- Genome Research
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 2000-12-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1903-1914
- ISSN
- 1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2015633789
- Cited by
- 413
- References
- 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Comparative Map of the Zebrafish Genome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/gr.10.12.1903
- The paper
- Woods, I. G. (2000). A Comparative Map of the Zebrafish Genome. Genome Research. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.10.12.1903
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.