The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
High-Throughput SNP Allele-Frequency Determination in Pooled DNA Samples by Kinetic PCR
Open accessAbstract
We have developed an accurate, yet inexpensive and high-throughput, method for determining the allele frequency of biallelic polymorphisms in pools of DNA samples. The assay combines kinetic (real-time quantitative) PCR with allele-specific amplification and requires no post-PCR processing. The relative amounts of each allele in a sample are quantified. This is performed by dividing equal aliquots of the pooled DNA between two separate PCR reactions, each of which contains a primer pair specific to one or the other allelic SNP variant. For pools with equal amounts of the two alleles, the two amplifications should reach a detectable level of fluorescence at the same cycle number. For pools that contain unequal ratios of the two alleles, the difference in cycle number between the two amplification reactions can be used to calculate the relative allele amounts. We demonstrate the accuracy and reliability of the assay on samples with known predetermined SNP allele frequencies from 5% to 95%, including pools of both human and mouse DNAs using eight different SNPs altogether. The accuracy of measuring known allele frequencies is very high, with the strength of correlation between measured and known frequencies having an r2 = 0.997. The loss of sensitivity as a result of measurement error is typically minimal, compared with that due to sampling error alone, for population samples up to 1000. We believe that by providing a means for SNP genotyping up to thousands of samples simultaneously, inexpensively, and reproducibly, this method is a powerful strategy for detecting meaningful polymorphic differences in candidate gene association studies and genome-wide linkage disequilibrium scans.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prospects for whole-genome linkage disequilibrium mapping of common disease genes
Kruglyak, L. (1999) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/9642 · Cited by 1,416
Risch, N., & Teng, J. (1998) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.8.12.1273 · Cited by 366
Single-tube genotyping without oligonucleotide probes
Germer, S., & Higuchi, R. (1999) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.9.1.72 · Cited by 199
Self-citation
Cited by
Cargill, M., Schrodi, S. J., Chang, M., Garcia, V. E., Brandon, R., Callis, K. P., Matsunami, N., Ardlie, K. G., Civello, D., Catanese, J. J., et al. (2007) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/511051 · Cited by 1,086
Accessing genetic variation: genotyping single nucleotide polymorphisms
Syvänen, A.-C. (2001) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/35103535 · Cited by 1,083
High-Throughput Genotyping with Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms
Ranade, K., Chang, M.-S., Ting, C.-T., Pei, D., Hsiao, C.-F., Olivier, M., Pesich, R., Hebert, J., Chen, Y.-D. I., Dzau, V. J., et al. (2001) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.157801 · Cited by 398
Pharmacogenomics: Unlocking the Human Genome for Better Drug Therapy
McLeod, H. L., & Evans, W. E. (2001) · Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology · doi:10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.41.1.101 · Cited by 331
Grupe, A., Abraham, R., Li, Y., Rowland, C., Hollingworth, P., Morgan, A., Jehu, L., Segurado, R., Stone, D., Schadt, E., et al. (2007) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/ddm031 · Cited by 289
Metadata
- Authors
- Germer, S., Holland, M. J., & Higuchi, R.
- Venue
- Genome Research
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 2000-02-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 258-266
- ISSN
- 1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-5469
- OpenAlex
- W2082588492
- Cited by
- 419
- References
- 3
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High-Throughput SNP Allele-Frequency Determination in Pooled DNA Samples by Kinetic PCR. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/gr.10.2.258
- The paper
- Germer, S., Holland, M. J., & Higuchi, R. (2000). High-Throughput SNP Allele-Frequency Determination in Pooled DNA Samples by Kinetic PCR. Genome Research. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.10.2.258
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.