Cited by 1,416Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and AnimalsForensic and Genetic Research

Prospects for whole-genome linkage disequilibrium mapping of common disease genes

Kruglyak, L·1999·Nature Genetics

Abstract

Recently, attention has focused on the use of whole-genome linkage disequilibrium (LD) studies to map common disease genes. Such studies would employ a dense map of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) to detect association between a marker and disease. Construction of SNP maps is currently underway. An essential issue yet to be settled is the required marker density of such maps. Here, I use population simulations to estimate the extent of LD surrounding common gene variants in the general human population as well as in isolated populations. Two main conclusions emerge from these investigations. First, a useful level of LD is unlikely to extend beyond an average distance of roughly 3 kb in the general population, which implies that approximately 500,000 SNPs will be required for whole-genome studies. Second, the extent of LD is similar in isolated populations unless the founding bottleneck is very narrow or the frequency of the variant is low (<5%).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/9642

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Before the discovery of haplotype blocks, Kruglyak's simulation study showed that under assumptions approximating modern human history, little LD would be expected beyond 3 kb.

    “Before their discovery, the prevailing view of LD in humans was represented by results from the simulation study of Kruglyak16, which showed that, under assumptions that were intended to approximate the history of modern humans, little LD would be expected beyond 3 kb.”
  • A simulation study suggested that LD might typically be too short to be useful with a SNP every 5 kb (500,000 SNPs across the genome), providing very weak LD (average correlation r2 = 0.1).

    “A simulation study suggested that LD might typically be too short to be useful with a SNP every 5 kb (500,000 SNPs across the genome) providing very weak LD (average correlation r2 = 0.1) (42).”

    From Genetic Mapping in Human Disease (2008) · cites this paper as [42]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kruglyak, L.
Affiliations
Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
Kruglyak, L
Venue
Nature Genetics
Published
1999-06
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
139-144
ISSN
  • 1061-4036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1718
OpenAlex
W2124277514
Cited by
1,416
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 33
FWCI
84.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
Keywords
linkage disequilibrium, whole genome mapping, single nucleotide polymorphisms, marker density, population simulation, founder effect, isolated populations, genetic association, human population genetics
MeSH terms
Chromosome Mapping, Gene Frequency, Genetic Markers, Humans, Models, Genetic, Polymorphism, Genetic, Genetic Variation, Linkage Disequilibrium, Genome, Human, Genetic Diseases, Inborn

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review