The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Patterns of Positive Selection in the Complete NBS-LRR Gene Family of Arabidopsis thaliana
Open accessAbstract
Plant disease resistance genes have been shown to be subject to positive selection, particularly in the leucine rich repeat (LRR) region that may determine resistance specificity. We performed a genome-wide analysis of positive selection in members of the nucleotide binding site (NBS)-LRR gene family of Arabidopsis thaliana . Analyses were possible for 103 of 163 NBS-LRR nucleotide sequences in the genome, and the analyses uncovered substantial evidence of positive selection. Sites under positive selection were detected and identified for 10 sequence groups representing 53 NBS-LRR sequences. Functionally characterized Arabidopsis resistance genes were in these 10 groups, but several groups with extensive evidence of positive selection contained no previously characterized resistance genes. Amino acid residues under positive selection were identified, and these residues were mapped onto protein secondary structure. Positively selected positions were disproportionately located in the LRR domain ( P < 0.001), particularly a nine–amino acid β-strand submotif that is likely to be solvent exposed. However, a substantial proportion (30%) of positively selected sites were located outside LRRs, suggesting that regions other than the LRR may function in determining resistance specificity. Because of the unusual sequence variability in the LRRs of this class of proteins, secondary-structure analysis identifies LRRs that are not identified by similarity analyses alone. LRRs also contain substantial indel variation, suggesting elasticity in LRR length could also influence resistance specificity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nod1, an Apaf-1-like Activator of Caspase-9 and Nuclear Factor-κB
Inohara, N., Koseki, T., del Peso, L., Hu, Y., Yee, C., Chen, S., Carrio, R., Merino, J., Liu, D., Ni, J., et al. (1999) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.274.21.14560 · Cited by 742
Cited by
Bayes Empirical Bayes Inference of Amino Acid Sites Under Positive Selection
Yang, Z. (2005) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msi097 · Cited by 2,320
Leister, D. (2004) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2004.01.007 · Cited by 585
Hybrid necrosis: autoimmunity as a potential gene-flow barrier in plant species
Bomblies, K., & Weigel, D. (2007) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2082 · Cited by 443
Reconstructing immune phylogeny: new perspectives
Litman, G. W., Cannon, J. P., & Dishaw, L. J. (2005) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri1712 · Cited by 353
Rieseberg, L. H., & Blackman, B. K. (2010) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcq126 · Cited by 341
Metadata
- Authors
- Mondragón-Palomino, M., Meyers, B. C., Michelmore, R. W., & Gaut, B. S.
- Venue
- Genome Research
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 2002-09-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1305-1315
- ISSN
- 1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-5469
- OpenAlex
- W2100684388
- Cited by
- 304
- References
- 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Patterns of Positive Selection in the Complete NBS-LRR Gene Family of Arabidopsis thaliana. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/gr.159402
- The paper
- Mondragón-Palomino, M., Meyers, B. C., Michelmore, R. W., & Gaut, B. S. (2002). Patterns of Positive Selection in the Complete NBS-LRR Gene Family of Arabidopsis thaliana. Genome Research. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.159402
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.